Everyone, I support freedom of speech, but if you met all the delegates I did at the march you would drop Barr like yesterday
Was Bob Barr at the March, come on pull the wool off of your eyes. Who did Ron Paul endorse at the March, noone but us and himself. It is up to us to finish this for him, not finish it for Barr, but for Ron Paul. We have delegates, and more delegates going to the convention. It is the time to unite behind the original man with the master plan, not the time to get behind some guy who comes along to steal the fire. Ron Paul is our fire, so seek the flame and get behind our delegates. Please, if you see a Bob Barr post, post a new thread that Ron is still in it to win it and how we need to back our delegates. No need to silence anyones speech just reverse the game. If there is anything we know how to do on daily paul it is reversing the game. Of course and please go to www.dvds4delegates.com and steal delegates from McCain, how fun.
output




















I couldn't agree more. This
I couldn't agree more. This thread is a good example of why the patriot movement has never accomplished much. Even with all the new people on board with Ron Paul common sense still seems illusive for most.
Dividing our energies only weakens us. If your not involved in you your local republican party you're not even in the game. Taking back the republican party is the only strategy that is currently working and has results.
Think about it what have all the marches and events accomplished? Very little. I suppose they are good for attracting new folks and they are fun to do on occasion but most of us are broke from the campaign and can't afford them and for the return on investment as far as helping the cause they are not worth it.
The one event I would have liked to go to as the Sturgis event because at least they had workshops and education etc. on being self reliant.
I think it would be great if Barr gets in the debates however Ron Paul was in the debates and here we are What makes you think Barr will accomplish something Dr. Paul did not?
Until we all as a movement focus the majority of our energy and efforts where it will get the most results and stop wasting so much time and money on feel good events that accomplish little or nothing get used to things getting steadily worse while folks here and elsewhere jump on all sorts of bandwagons going nowhere.
-----
Prepare For the Coming Storms, Join New FreelandersSelf Reliance & Preparedness Forums
It is not an Either/Or, why try and make it one?
Free and Brave
or Cradle to Grave
You can't have both
after our delegates
After our delegates make an awesome showing for Dr. Paul in St. Paul, we hit the ground running to get Barr support and into the debates. We need to convert everybody, even the drug war supporting war mongers. Make em wake up and join us. Could Baldwin and Barr join forces. A Ron Paul coalition?
Ron Paul is a once in a lifetime candidate and our hero. Nothing changes that.
Actually, RP is a twice-in-a-lifetime candidate (so far)...
...1988 and 2008. Third time's a charm? :-)
http://groups.yahoo.com/g...
Let's Raise the Barr
I wish you much success at the Republican Convention and if Ron Paul is nominated then I will support him and I dare say the Libertarian Party will, too. However, I am not going to drop my support for Bob Barr, the Libertarian Presidential candidate. Barr will be on at least 48 state ballots and maybe 50. He is speaking out for individual liberty and against big government and violations of the Constitution every other day on TV. In the latest Zogby poll, Barr is at 6% nationwide, with 10% in New Hampshire and 9% in Nevada. If he can get to 10% nationwide in 3 polls, he will meet the criteria for the first Presidential debate sponsored by Google in September. Then our voice will be heard by millions of Americans who will learn about liberty and how we can restore peace and prosperity. Barr has changed his views, all for the better, since he served in Congress. I am sure most of us have changed our views for the better, too. Life is a learning experience and if our movement is to grow we must accept new people and embrace effective spokespeople. I respect those libertarians who choose to work within the Republican Party. But I am going to keep on working for Bob Barr because, realistically, he is on the front line of the battle for Liberty now.
We are Allies
Just look at the modern Republican and Democrat party.
I wish all Republicans would come to their senses and change their minds like Barr did.
That is our goal around here. If the ones in office do not change then we throw them out. Barr got thrown out. He then stepped back and looked at his time in office and realized his mistakes. I have a hard time seeing how his run is not good for us and Paul.
drop Barr
How can I 'drop' him? I haven't voted for anyone yet. I'm researching options. I researched Reverend Baldwin, I researched Mr. Barr and I've even read through Obama's and McCain's issues pages. I love Dr. Paul - what a rare candidate! The convention is coming fast, then we can all settle down and make our choices.
I agree
Concentrate on the RPR but.....can't we f*rt and chew gum at the same time??
"The first thing a man will do for his ideals is lie"
-Joseph A. Schumpeter
Probably
NOT and do them both justice :-) If something is worth doing, it is worth more than a little sweat, and it should be done well and with full enthusiasm.
IT'S DOABLE
I think it's ok for people to do both but....
you all are probably right; there's still a lot of people to convert by November! and no reason to stop trying. And Ron Paul is the reason we are all here at all.
WOW We reject a man who we converted....
Let me try to understand the Anti-Barr bias...So we beat this man in his home state in GA, and he then took a step back and realized the errors of his way, changed his positions, and is now with us in our fight for liberty.......WE CONVERT the man, and then we proceed to hammer away on his past...I don't find that as very intelligent...
WE NEED TO SUPPORT HIM TO GET INTO THE DEBATES! IF HE'S NOT IN THE DEBATES WHO WILL SPEAK ON BEHALF OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT AND THE CORE PRINCIPLES OF OUR MOVEMENT? MCCAIN? OBAMA? STOP THE HATE AND AT LEAST REALIZE THAT HE IS A STEP FORWARD FROM THE BIG GOV. POLICIES! THIS REVOLUTION WILL COME IN SMALL STEPS AND WILL TAKE TIME! WE NEED PEOPLE TO HEAR OUR MAIN MESSAGE, AND BARR IS OUR ONLY SHOT IN SPREADING THE MESSAGE IN THE DEBATES. WE NEED HIM!
ya know I will agree with
ya know I will agree with you on that! I cannot vote for barr.. my vote will go to baldwin, but I would like to see him in the debates! he is not an enemy but still/ I'm tired of being lied to!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
Lost Cause on Here
I have moved past the anti Barr crap. Am I as excited about Barr, no. Will I donate as much to Barr, no. Do I think Barr believes everything I do, no. But, will I vote for him and encourage McCain and Obama supporters to vote for him, YES.
Nothing against Baldwin, but as you say Barr has a good chance of getting into the debates. That means issues we care deeply about could be on the national stage again. Even if he voted a certain way, he will make our case on many issues.
and if he were to get in to
and if he were to get in to the debates is he going to say he will stop the Iraq war immedietly? is he going to want the income tax abolished!, is he wanting to stop the federal reserve or will he just go along to get along.. will he explain why the war on drugs is a useless waste of money and time? or will he pander to get votes?
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
You think Baldwin is against
You think Baldwin is against the war on drugs? From what I've seen he tend to defer to states right and avoid personal opinion all together. At least Barr now lobbies for the Marijuana Policy Project.
http://www.mpp.org/states...
http://www.antiwar.com/ju...
Have you even bothered to do any research?
http://www.libertymaven.c...
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
So you want him out of the debates?
Yes, he wants out of Iraq immediately...you know what, just look at his site and get the facts there...I'm tired of defending Barr like he is Satan , and if we vote for him and God forbid he wins, we might actually have moved closer to liberty...
I GIVE UP
Your are right, It is a lost Cause...
TAJITJ, I just can't stand people BASHING Barr as if he weren't on our side, don't they recognize that he is not the enemy??...It is just so hard for me to accept the slander, lies, and shortsightedness of some members on this site in regards to Barr and his campaign in relation to the whole scheme in the Revolution movement...They just keep there eyes in the present with zero regard for the future, and it's so hard for me to stomach cause I want liberty here as soon as possible. Barr is on our side, and he can help us bring about our goals faster than without him.
before or after he voted for
before or after he voted for the war on drugs, the patriot act ETC. ETC. ETC!
ZEBRAS don't change there stripes! has barr said he is going to stop the war in Iraq and eliminate the federal reserve? I havn't seen it!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
Fortunately we aren't
Fortunately we aren't zebras, we're human.
You haven't seen anything because you refuse to look. You're sitting at a computer and can't google "barr foreign policy" "barr monetary policy" "barr drug policy"
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
Perhaps Barr planned on coming to the march
but got kicked off the bus he had payed to ride on by Baldwin supporters who didn't like that he was supporting himself?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://will86aber.wordpre...
BOB on my knob BARR---- in a
BOB on my knob BARR---- in a video telling about his vote for the patriot act.. and you guys want this guy to represent you??!!!!
http://www.brasschecktv.c...
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
http://www.americanfreedo...
http://www.americanfreedo...
You wanna stand that up against Obama's agenda be my guest.
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
obamas agenda??? what about
obamas agenda??? what about mccains? your going to tell me that barr has done a 180?? the ONLY CHOICE IS RON PAUL! and if not him the ONLY OTHER CHOICE IS BALDWIN!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
McCain is mostly irrelevant
McCain is mostly irrelevant he can never overcome the lack of an actual base. He's only relevant in that we need to convert his delegates. But he will never be president. Barr is not competing with Paul and if he was would not Baldwin be competing as well? No, i do not believe this is the case.
Similarly to McCain's vote split problem. Barr and Baldwin have the same sort of issue. Come November, unless the Barr backers fall back to Baldwin, then the dilution of support prevents Barr from being effective. Unfortunately, not enough is being done to get Baldwin national recognition. That brings us back to Barr who can possibly get into the debates. This is like two sprained ankles, which leg do you limp on? Unless you bust your @$$ and get Baldwin in the debates. The only possibility to get any of our issue on the table is threw Barr. If by chance both attain significant nation recognition the Barr backers will have to move to support Baldwin or they lose to the anti-Barr's just as McCain will lose to the anti-McCain's.
Consider in hindsight of the Clinton/Dole/Perot race. Those who supported Dole sank their own ship and they know it. Had they given into Perot they could have salvaged at least something. Instead they gave it to Clinton. The Gore/Bush/Nader race is similar in this way although Nader never got into the debates. I'm sure they reflected back on the Clinton/Dole/Perot race which is why they kept Nader as far away as posible and even so still hung themselves. If Dems wanted to actually salvage the prospect of a non-Bush presidency they could have voted Nader but chose to shoot themselves instead. Now that both sides have experienced that same pain. This should all be a reminder of what they face this year.
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
Speaking of InSane's irrelevance...
Look at this article. The picture alone says it all.
Vote Republicrat '08!
Woah!!!
That's disturbing.
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
Let's use a little reason, Please.
I'm trying ot be brief because I don' t think most of you are capable of changing your minds because your so entrenched in your opinions, but may I ask a few question...with regard to the last couple of posts I really don't see the supposed argument.
In one posts, one mention the notion that they just don't trust him, but maybe in 2012 I will. What is there to trust?! Let's face it he's not going to win, so what on God's earth is their to trust? He is saying the right things now, and that is all you should trust because after November the presidential election and subsequently, Barr's campaign is over. Now, Let's say he wins the election, is that really such a bad thing? Either Obama or Mccain are going to win, and any one of us would rather have Barr in the White House. What he is saying now is what most of us would overwhelmingly agree with and they are further getting into mainstream with the Time magazine article "The (Not-so) Lunatic fringe. His message of liberty and limited government is going mainstream and why are we here trying to halt the forward progress? Rome wasn't built in a day...
Now to the post about Barr being a Neo-con plant...This attack to me is almost hysterically funny but it shouldn't be because the truth is conspiracy theorists believe it as gospel. Do you even consider using a minutiae of reason behind that attack? Why would the Neo-Cons plant Barr? So he could help John Mccain lose? I don't think that would be very productive on your part...Try to find a shred of reasoned, logical argument in support of you theory before you continue to slander the man wrongfully.
If you dog starts quacking, will you believe he is a duck?
I would suggest that maybe you are trusting too easily and the fact of the matter is that Bob Barr has not proven himself to be a libertarian. I was the one who mentioned I might consider voting for him in 2012, but only if we can't bring the Republican Party some sanity before then...because that will give him 4 years to show us he is a long-term, truly reformed libertarian supporting true conservatism. I don't think he has it in him, frankly, because of his record. Do you believe that if he talks the talk, without a reliable record of walking the walk, then after years of being otherwise, you trust him? You trust him enough to vote for him to lead the country? You trust him enough to campaign for him when we have other work to do?
Yes, of course, there have been other party takeovers, but what about those Libertarians who are not happy with Barr...who believe he is there to "Republicanize" their beliefs and only to get a nomination and use their support to his advantage?
You may laugh, but let's say I am a discouraged Paul supporter (I'm not), but let's assume I am. Bob Barr, who is quite well known in Republican circles, is put in a candidacy position within the Libertarian Party and instead of fighting on for Ron Paul, I do the easy and expected thing, and do everything I can to support Bob Barr. As you stated, what's the problem if Bob Bar "is not going to win" anyway? Well, the problem, my friend, is that now the Ron Paul supporters are further diluted, attention distracted, and not spending their time wisely. In turn, this makes things much easier for the Republican Party to stay the same Good Old Boys party, they need to continue to marginalize the importance of Ron Paul and his support. So, thank you very much Bob Barr and all those who have jumped on his bandwagon. You know, maybe it is the Democrats who are running Bob Barr....whoever, his run does not benefit Ron Paul and very possibly does benefit the Republican and Democratic Parties, because as you alluded to "Bob Bar will not win."
Laugh all you want. Laugh yourself into supporting a loser who will only detract from our efforts. If you are only a Bob Barr supporter, please return to DailyBarr. If Barack Obama changed his name to "Walter Williams" and you like the Walter Williams would you then vote for him?
IT'S DOABLE
You really have to stop
You really have to stop living in denial. Paul LOST, perhaps you didn't read about it, but the man lost the race! In a heartbeat, I would have voted for him for President if he had won, which I tried my best to make happen. If he had won, I would have done anything to campaign for him. If it meant closing my business to live on cheese crackers I would have done it. He was the best of the best.
But, he lost and he didn't want to run on a third party line. That was his choice, he had his reasons as much as I personally disagree with them. The bottom line is, you will not have a chance to vote for him on a ballot, other then writing him in on the ballots of states where that is allowed, but even that can not be done across the country. So its time to come out of denial, and accept reality. Support Baldwin or Barr or some other choice that is still running. Ron Paul is no longer running for anything except Congress, that is reality and there is nothing you can do to change that.
So, perhaps you can tell me who WON!???
You apparently do not read DailyPaul often, or you would know you are wrong. It is sad you appear weak in your resolve to your commitment to Dr. Paul. I do not have to stop anything...it is out of my control, as it is out of your control.
Is it likely that Ron Paul will be on the ballot, no...but is it possible. I will not, nor will many, be voting for Barr or even Baldwin...or, at least not giving it any thought until after the convention. Why you fail to see the reason for that, is beyond me. I am here on DailyPAUL as a supporter of Ron Paul and the tasks he has set before us. If that is not your reason for being here, if you don't understand why Barr in particular might be a tool of the political machine, that is your perogative.
Do you not understand the concept of a "suspended campaign" and competition as opposed to a withdrawal? Ron Paul...did you not hear him...encouraged us to go forward and to win as many delegates as possible and to be present at the convention. Ron Paul does not have to "run" for congress, it is his...he has no opposition. If he were "no longer running" he would have resigned his campaign, endorsed another candidate (probably Baldwin), and instructed his delegates to that effect. Please quit misleading people. Dr. Paul is still the best of the best and he has lost nothing and has much more to gain than any of the 3rd party candidate and a better chance of gaining it, too.
There is a force now and a pressure on the government to perform...no matter who the next president is...because the Ron Paul people are gaining strength, force and Ron Paul has had an imprint on history. There's more to do!
IT'S DOABLE
You say LOST as in past
You say LOST as in past tense and yet the convention is still a ways off and anything can happen between now and then. I agree with some of your premise in other posts but I reject conceding defeat. There is fine line between being realistic and poisoning your own mind.
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
go back in time and see
go back in time and see where the democrats took over the republican party!
were they saying the same thing you are now? People are starting to wake up! people are now starting to go 3rd party.. as you saw.. gravel and bob on my knob barr came into the libertarian party... keyes came into the constitution party! 2 neocons trying to vie for the head of both parties.. just like the democrats did with the republicans.. the republican and democratic party are now the same, big government, big spending, warmongering liberals! now that people are starting to wake up and I beleive Ron Paul has woke them up they rush to infiltrate the 3rd parties... you just wait till this economy collapses! those idiots in government are going to have bullseyes on there heads.. go look at the french revolution! there will be many angry people in this country.. they will go after who is responcible.. and the American public knows who they are! thank God the Constitution party saw threw Keyes BS! If I can't vote for Paul.. Baldwin has my vote!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
So your saying...
Big government liberals are going to take over third parties too? It's tough to debate you because you just simply think people cannot under no circumstances legitimately change their minds after they saw the evils of the past big government policies. I simply do not have such a lack of faith in my fellow man that they can't analyze their past positions, and to come to conclusions that his past suppositions were incorrect. Throw some of that faith in the Lord to your fellow man...
So my question to you is do you want Barr out of the debates?
My lawyer made a comment to
My lawyer made a comment to me about the people I'm involved with via a nasty lawsuit. His comment was never assume maliciousness where incompetence is more likely the reason.
The same holds true of 90% of conspiracies I've seen thrown around. People build these based on other factors, in this case how much they despise neo-cons. I hate neo-cons too but to assume that they set in motion this Barr nomination, well... its not even the making of a bad novel! There is nothing for them to gain, and they have everything to loose. If you would stop and take a step back you would see how absolutely foolish you look even saying it.
Now what they have set out to do with Paul's nomination is no conspiracy, they are open and up front about it, talk to one of your elected Republican (I assume all of you chest beating, "we can get Paul the R nomination" do talk to these folks) I have and do talk to them, I have worked for YEARS trying to get some of them to see the light of liberty, and have had some small success - very small! They will rationalize all day long on how I am wrong, and they do the same to Paul. Its no conspiracy, this is their religion, and Paul is the one telling them they are wrong. They just simply oppose what he says.
Barr however has seen the light, and he is good at getting attention. He is now an ally, not the enemy. That is just simply the truth, as boring as it may be.
Problem
It's tough to reason with unreasonable people...
Okay Richiep
Which of their poisons would you have us drink, in order to become "more acceptable" to the neocons?
He is not saying the right
He is not saying the right things. I watched his entire interview on Beck and I could hardly get through it all. He waffles. Unfortunately, he is not for the radical changes this country needs, and not even close to Ron. Not even close. He MAY be better than the presumptive nominees, but with his ego and other things, I am not even so sure of that, so I do not fall into your category there, either. We just need to keep on keeping on. "They" have not beat us yet, and this election results should not change that, no matter what, nor who.
That's exactly what this country needs...
Here is my vision for the revolution:
On the Inside C4L gets us a few more seats and works to diffuse big gov. programs.
On the outside we need people to start warming up and start getting comfortable with our ideas. Whether the accusation is right or wrong, but the fact of the matter is that a lot of people see us an extreme or a lunatic fringe. We need Barr, a somewhat watered down version of Ron Paul to get the primary ideas mainstream so they understand and recognize the principle behind our movement. From there we can then move on to putting out more "extreme" ideas and views...
We need to take this one step at a time, and the Non-Paul supporters need to be taught how to crawl before they have the ability to walk. This movement is going to take some time, but Barr is a great way to open up to the public. WE NEED TO GET HIM IN THE DEBATES!
Good post, as your
Good post, as your discussing strategy. We all know Barr is not Ron Paul, we all know we'd rather have Ron Paul elected. Sadly, people who want it "all or nothing" always get nothing. We have to get liberty back by first, stopping from loosing more. Getting Barr into the debates is one way to do that.
Oh, really....people who want it "all or nothing"
always get nothing? One could say that quitters never win, and winners never quit! If four years from now, Bob Barr has shown me he has truly changed, I will support his endeavors. People can change, but he nor you Barr supporters have the right to expect Ron Paul supporters to support Barr just because he and you say he has changed. I want some proof! On top of that, for those of you who don't like it that some of us Ron Paul supporters are in it to the end...that is exactly one of the things that is wrong with society today! People get married and if everything isn't just hunky-dory, they want a divorce, no second thoughts about it! No ethics, no desire to actually attempt to honor the VOWS they made, etc. And what is really a scream about all this is.........Barr has done a flip-flop...exactly what Ron Paul supporters don't like about McCain and Obama....but Barr flip-flopping is different, right??? Give me a break! Plus many of us have complained about Congress' lack of ethics. Geesh!
Here this, and hear it loud: I am voting for Ron Paul....I got involved to see Ron Paul elected President....I will write him in whether it counts or not...I have not yet given up hope...I am not a quitter...
What also makes me po'd with you Barr people is: THE RNC HAS NOT YET BEEN HELD...yet I'm supposed to believe your intentions are honorable!
And what a joke this nonsense that Barr couldn't be a plant! The fact that Barr people are constantly at this site with their propaganda/lies, and pushing their attempt to take votes away from Ron Paul and give them to Barr...says otherwise, imo...
And the reason I don't rant about Baldwin people is because they are not push, push, push to vote for Baldwin, and I have yet to read a Baldwin post that is full of propaganda/lies.....that's the difference!
There are some who will support Barr or Baldwin,
and some who will support RP or others.
People will make up their own minds.
I like Dr. Paul's positions.
He differs from certain Libertarian Party platform planks in the areas where I also differ. And he differs from Barr in the areas that I also differ from Barr.
I'm not a member of the LP, and don't plan to be.
So to me, RP is the preferred candidate.
Simple as that.
If it comes to a situation where AFTER the RNC convention in September, it is a finality that RP will not be in the race, and it is official, then I will look at other candidates which could serve as a 2nd choice for me.
Who's Bob Barr?
I thought this was the Daily Paul? I thought this was about the Revolution March and the Campaign For Liberty. Where was Bob Barr when that asshat Guiliani was snickering at Ron in the debates? Where was Bob Barr when the media was oscillating between smear campaign and blackout? Where was Bob Barr for the 20 years when Ron Paul was the sole voice of reason in the wilderness? Where was Bob Barr when liberty needed patriots to support Dr Paul in the primaries? Was Bob Barr at the March? Will he be at the C4L rally? Will he walk 280 miles with me and my fellow patriots into Minneapolis?
I will grant you that this is about liberty, not Ron Paul. And the campaign for liberty will include lots of candidates in lots of races from dog catcher to president over the next 10 - 20 years. But supporting Johnny-come-lately's who voted for the Patriot Act, who supported this neo-fascist regime, who suddenly sees money and votes like low hanging fruit ... supporting people like this isn't on my agenda.
We will come away from the rally in September with a clear vision for this election and many to come. In the interim, Bob Barr could do some repenting ... maybe make a stand at a personal cost against the Fed ... do something beyond lip service to garner all the support Ron and all of us worked so hard to build. In my heart, I smell a rat in Bob Barr. It is on him to prove me wrong.
But one who looks intently at the perfect law, the law of liberty, and abides by it, not having become a forgetful hearer but an effectual doer, this man will be blessed in what he does. - James 1:25
Where were you...???
Where were you when Paul presented the American Freedom Agenda Act to Congress? Did you write your congressman urging them to support this legislation? This BTW was going on over a year ago... and you ask pentance of Barr???
http://www.americanfreedo...
http://www.americanfreedo...
http://fora.tv/2007/07/31...
Paul BTW did not vote against the last FISA amendment, he wasn't there to vote. Do i blame him? No, but he's been getting smeared for it anyway and there is little you can do to defend it.
No Barr was not in DC he was in Las Vegas, Nevada attending a fairly major meeting of the Freedom movement. Not this movement but the one that existed prior to the Paul campaign. They have this every year and had there been no DC march Paul would have attended that as he really sort of did anyway via broadband interview. While DC was probably a great place to go to get fired up and pissed off and reinvigorated. Las Vegas is were the debate was, sort the CFR of liberty. So calling Barr out for not being in DC is really a weak and ignorant argument and even if Barr had been there would that have influenced you what so ever. No.
http://www.freedomfest.co...
And what of those 80 or so guest speakers in Vegas? They weren't in DC either and this is where some of the most prominent minds of liberty in this country were many of whom are Paul backers. Including Mary J. Ruwart whom Paul has recommended appointing her director of the FDA. Peter Schiff whom we all know as Paul's financial adviser. Steve Forbes who said of Paul's hard money policy, "tying the dollar to gold and silver the dollar is good as gold..."
http://www.freedomfest.co...
http://www.freedomfest.co...
So just because someone who is not in attendance for a given event does not mean they are for or against the subject matter or the premise and you need look no further than yourself for evidence of that.
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
Enter Reality
JohnfromChicago you made some terrific, terrific, needed to be said comments. One point where we might disagree a bit is that it is all about Liberty. Certainly it is about liberty, but it is also about Ron Paul. It is about his vision, his dream and his plan which we are helping to take place. It is about a chance to bring his name to the floor of the National Convention, no matter how slight a chance that might be - because he is the best possible candidate and because we want to show the RNC in DC that we do not take their orders anymore. Now we are back to Liberty again..."you can't have my rights, I'm still using them."
Thank you for your clarity.
IT'S DOABLE
Good thinking Tog2476
DailyPAUL. If Barr proves himself over the next 4 years, maybe 2012 is his year, but while the libertarian party might think they converted Barr, I think the Republicans have planted Barr to help minimalize Ron Paul. Many libertarians I have met do not back Barr and are actually leaving the party because of him. Sorry, his supposed turnaround is just too great to believe and he has to tow the line for awhile. Ron Paul has had liberatarian ideals for years and years and has proven his time, over and over. We should have one set of Goals - Ron Paul, Ron Paul Candidates, the National Convention to be played out as hard and fast as we can scramble, Ron Paul mini-Convention participation, and long term Campaign for Liberty. This is the year of the Patriots.
IT'S DOABLE
"I think the Republicans have planted Barr
to help minimalize Ron Paul"
Exactly what I've been suspecting. The guy just doesn't ring true!
Name a few. Show me the
Name a few. Show me the money and the backing. Perhaps it was these evil republicans?
http://www.americanfreedo...
CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting
Exactly
A candidate cannot disown your political history and we must suspect his motives. He furthered my suspicion when he was on CNN stating how he would pull all the Ron Paul people and the financial backing. He seemed smug and his friends tend to be of the necon ilk. The Republican Party is not harmed by minimal votes going to a Libertarian candidate - in a way with Barr as a Libertarian now, they own both parties. These are crafty players who have been at this game a long time. There are deals and wheels which turn to which we will never be privy. The GOP knows it can be harmed by an uprising of Ron Paul delegates/supporters and true Patriots, especially come September. There advance spearhead all along has been to minimalize Ron Paul. We need, imo, to stay focused.
IT'S DOABLE
As a long time LP member, I
As a long time LP member, I know there was this EXACT type of Barr bashing happening about a year ago within LP circles, except it was Paul bashing! I could post link after link of articles bashing Paul on how he was not, "a true Libertarian" or "libertarian enough". Let alone all the reason we should never support him as he is a REPUBLICAN and we have all the proof in the world how corrupt that party is to the bone, corruption is in their very DNA as a party. Hell, if you guys would take off your blinders to that, you would see what they do, have done, and will continue to do, to stop Paul in his tracks. When you do, you will realize that the Republicans will never ever ever ever let Paul be their nominee, You can send them all the DVDs that Blockbuster and netflix rent in 5 years and they will not change, as a party.
The only thing you can do is pick one or two of them off at a time and that is EXACTLY what happened with Barr. The LP went after him and it made him realize he was WRONG. That process took several years. Its never easy to admit you are wrong but as individuals we can do it. Collectively however will never happen and that's why going after the "party" (as in the collective) as a whole will not work. Now you can go after the delegates, but you must know that at BEST you may get to 5% or maybe if you send really really hypnotic DVDs you might get 6% of them. We still loose.
In spite of this, last year I left the LP and for the first time registered as a Republican, I went to NH to campaign for Paul. I know how to campaign as I ran twice for congress, used to be a county chair for the LP and have done any number of things politically. What did I find out? It was as hard to get people to look at Paul as it was to get them to look at anyone from the LP. People are not easily converted. I thought maybe with him have the R label might help, but it didn't.
So here we have now one person who we have converted and you guys endlessly bash him. How stupid is that? You Bash him yet two seconds later you say you will convert the Republicans enough to vote for Paul!? How stupid are you folks? I mean I don't want to insult anyone but really lets be honest here, how stupid are you being over this?
Some times I read this kind of ongoing bashing and really get to thinking there is no hope as the people who should be at least logical about politics are just as blind and dumb as the masses. As for me, I'm going back to the LP and will proudly support Bob Barr as he is the best choice of the current choices (As Ron Paul is NOT an option as he choose not to run outside the R party after he LOST that party's nomination). If this site is ONLY about Paul, then it should be shut down as Paul LOST, he can not win, he LOST, just like the ghoul, and the huckster, Fred and the rest, he did not win. McSame is who won and that is reality. You might want to deny that, and refuse to believe it, but if you look, Paul doesn't. The fact is he is NOT going to be nominated and he will be the first to admit it.
I agree with you
that some in the LP so critical of Barr, would also be critical of Paul for the same reasons (federalism, their pro-life position, securing the borders, "DOMA" for those states that prefer it etc.) and that it is good for you to support Barr. One has to see which direction the LP will go. Some seem to want to kick Barr out and they may want to change the platform radically again.
On the DVD's you fail to understand that not only has this helped quite a few voters to support Paul in the primaries, but those in Alaska that first used it with regard to the delegates, has stated 10% or more of the McCain
delegates already went over to Paul as a result of this.
Someone like Ann Coulter - who differs strongly with Paul on the war as we know - has said on radio she likes Dr. Paul and Paul is more of a Republican than McCain. Also consider the pressure on the GOP with Barr's polling. McCain is being outpolled by Obama even in his own state.
This will be additional pressure on the GOP. And believe me, a party will do everything to win. Also consider how the lowering in the USD, the higher oil prince, the situation in Iraq and economy will influence them. In Iraq the govt. wants to include a certain timetable for withdrawal, otherwise the UN agreement will not be extended, which means the US troops will have to pull out by the end of this year.