now we have Barr people here on this post pretending to be Baldwin people...rich, very rich....always felt, then later stated that it was all a big plot to divert us from Ron Paul... that certain NON-Ron Paul people signed up here a looonnnggg time ago to pretend to be supporters, so their supposed (length of) service to the Revolution would be believable....
People, a reminder, Ron Paul supports and likes both Baldwin and Barr and neither one of them is the enemy! Take a step back, breath and try to see the bigger picture of the movement...
PS. It is possible to endorse one candidate and support another...
So during Naomi's speech did you just turn it off, or did you support her and listen to what she said? Kucinich, did you support his Impeachment bill or dismiss it as garbage?
Man, Kevin, your just trying to find an enemy everywhere you go...We can support more than one candidate you know.
You aren't hearing me. I am saying that my views on Bob Barr are based on my judgment of whether or not I would vote for him for President, and I wouldn't, based on his record on civil liberties. I wouldn't vote for Dennis Kucinich because he's a socialist, and if Naomi Wolf ran for office, I wouldn't vote for her for the same reason.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Kevin, Barr is not the enemy. I know you won't vote for him, but it is possible to support someone you don't vote for. Barr and Baldwin are on our side, and we should support them both, while you vote for one.
have said it a million times... Why would you vote for Barr? He VOTED FOR THE PATRIOT ACT. Now before you go spouting... well it was unintentional, that IS NO EXCUSE. Intentional or not the damage is done. If he was guilty of not reading it, he is lacking in his constitutional duties to the citizens of this country. If he read it and voted for it, well he's a traitor to this country and it's people. He was traitorous because he voted yes. The jig is up. It's too late for the "Im'a Constitutionalist" speech, dont ya think? And NOOOOO it's not possible for me to support someone I wouldn't vote for. If I wouldn't vote for Barr why would I support him?
"If he was guilty of not reading it, he is lacking in his constitutional duties to the citizens of this country. If he read it and voted for it, well he's a traitor to this country and it's people."
Allow me to interject: Bob Barr is a very well-read, intelligent man. There is no way in the world he voted for the Patriot Act without reading it and without knowing exactly what it stood for.
For that matter, all he had to do was listen to Dr. Paul. Dr. Paul was sounding off on the Patriot Act back in Fall 2001, like Paul Revere.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
If he's running against my candidate, am I supposed to support him?
I do appreciate your polite tone--compared to other Barr posters who have called Baldwin supporters snake handlers and "Jesus Juice drinkers"--but you still often make no sense.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
I liked Chuck Baldwin until I read that he supports cutting off all trade to China. That would destroy our economy and China's economy considering 70% of everything we own is "made in China." But I could deal with that. Then I read an article he wrote that was totally homophobic which is a deal breaker for me. So I had to choose between a homophobe or an ex-neo con and I've chosen the ex-neo con.
----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul
I would take the homophobe! homosexuality is perversion .I don't like perverts! but then again its your life if you want to take part in that then its your business not mine.. just don't push it on me.. do what you do in your own bedroom and don't make me accept what you do and accept it as normal.. BECAUSE IT IS NOT!
seems that some in the Freedom Movement would rather
Major on the Minors - when it comes to the Issues.
Rather than notice that no other candidate stands with Ron Paul on
the major issues - because CB is a Christian Pastor - the minor
family issues get brought up - But, this is only because CB identifies
himself with Jesus Christ - and those specific people don't like that.
So be it - Chuck Baldwin 2008
But let's all be sure to come together in September on the 1st and 2nd.
We have to take over Minneapolis in a big, big way!
I'm not a homosexual. But I have a family member who is and friends who are.
I don't understand the argument when people say "do whatever you want in your own bedroom but don't push it on me!" Do a lot of homosexuals try to get heterosexuals to have same sex relationships? I've certainly never heard a single case.
----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul
First off, I have friends who are too, and relatives who are homosexual too. I am a Christian and believe it is a sin, but I also believe that Christians are NOT to judge unbelievers. What they want to do among themselves is fine with me, but when they push themselves and their lifestyle on me, or mine, I do get a bit upset. A man who was my son's boss where he worked tried to push himself on my son. A female relative tried pushing herself on another of my relatives. And while my 7 year old was having xrays by a homosexual, he tried to get my son alone in the darkroom with him. There, now you have it, 3 cases. And we basically live a sheltered life, homeschooled, etc. I don't speak out about homosexuals in the schools, mostly because it is public school, and it doesn't concern me as I homeschool.
Homosexuals flaunt their sexuality (at least in my neck of the woods). I don't like to see hetrosexuals lip-locked either. There are some things that should be kept private.
Simple question: Why target 2 year olds? I don't get targeting and indoctrinating a child who's mind is only beginning to develop. I just don't get it.
The gay plan is to break down the family and get people to feel the narcotic of determining right and wrong for themselves (Gen.3:5). The sad fact is the homo's are being played the same way NWO Rockefellar funded the womens movement.
I like Baldwin, I just wish he would make an effort to be seen in the media....because it hasn't happened, and I hope that changes. He won't convert anyone being a recluse seen only by those in our movement.
is the candidate running who is best in agreement with me on the issues that concern me the most. I don't agree with everything he's about, but he's close enough he will most likely have my vote in November.
There are the "christians" like Ron Paul and Mother Theresa, and then there are the so-called Christians like Hitler and others.... who claim to be Christians are obviously are not.
You really can't throw them all together in one group. Each person needs to be looked at individually.
I like Baldwin, though I really wish he would leave God out of his political speeches. Ron Paul was great that way; he didn't constantly refer to God, which comforted those of us who have watched politicians use the Almighty as a crutch for weak-minded philosophies and empty promises of brighter horizons and days of glory and all that crap.
While I don't think Baldwin fits into that category, and that he would keep his religion out of government policy, I get a little worried when someone who has an unassailable and impressive theologic and religious background, and no need to discuss anything other than the mountain-heap of problems we face as a society regardless of religion, decides still to inject God into political speeches.
That's just my personal opinion, though. I think bringing up God in the political arena inherently cheapens the concept of Him/Her/It, sort of like football players praying and hoping that God gives a rat's ass about who wins that particular game that night. Of course, one could argue the stakes are higher when it comes to our nation's future, but that is where my concept of God differs, and that's a whole other thread :)
I believe this is the most eloquent statement about religion and politics I have ever read. This to me speaks volumes about the issue. It is authentic and is not the normal religious pandering that we see in politics. It is Ron Paul through and through.
After discovering Ron Paul last year, the first thing I did after hearing him speak, was to search the internet to see if he believed in the right to life. This statement was what sealed the deal. What an amazing man! http://www.ronpaullibrary...
It is with hesitation that I post these comments since there is so much Godlessness in America today and especially by some of the libertine followers of Paul. America's problems are moral and will not be solved by getting the "right person" into positions of authority. America has been kicking God out of the public square for decades. The neo-cons are simply a reflection of our non-religious and non-family culture. Remove the Christian God and you get the obvious results, evolution, chance, meaninglessness, etc. Anyone that sends their children to be dis-educated by the state should be identified as the problem. Culture is Religion externalized.
What exactly do you think your Crusades example proves? Have you ever actually read anything on the Crusades, or are you doing exactly what you condemn Dr. Paul's opponents for doing, namely drawing sweeping conclusions about issues they know nothing about?
The Crusades were such a minor event in the history of Christianity's relationship with Islam that as recently as the 18th century if you had asked a Muslim about the Crusades he would have had absolutely no idea what on God's green earth you were talking about.
And in the 20th century, God wasn't the "center of the universe," as you put it. So did we get peace and love? No, we got Stalin, who presided over an officially atheistic regime. We got the race-worship of Hitler. We got Mao.
In the 18th century, in the 18 months of the Reign of Terror, atheists and deists killed more Catholics than the whole centuries-long history of the Inquisition put together.
Why are some people able to see through political nonsense, but then turn around and repeat the same dumb propaganda when it comes to religion?
Sorry, I don't know any facts about the bus story.
"Troll" applies to poster BillyDee/JustCantGetEnough, who lived up to the name x 10, and got a lot of people on this Forum stirred up with his relentless, thoughtless and clueless shilling for Barr. If not for that sort of approach, the word "troll" would probably not have been used very often.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Interesting
that Chuck Baldwin spoke immediately before Ron Paul - at DC March...
in introductory fashion!
Sort of like of team!
yep! if not Ron Paul then
yep! if not Ron Paul then its Chuck Baldwin for me!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
I found that interesting as
I found that interesting as well.
I wonder if there's an endorsement down the road.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
I
I agree!
http://noworldorder08.com...
OMG, thank you for the big laugh....
now we have Barr people here on this post pretending to be Baldwin people...rich, very rich....always felt, then later stated that it was all a big plot to divert us from Ron Paul... that certain NON-Ron Paul people signed up here a looonnnggg time ago to pretend to be supporters, so their supposed (length of) service to the Revolution would be believable....
Reminder: Paul likes both Baldwin and Barr
People, a reminder, Ron Paul supports and likes both Baldwin and Barr and neither one of them is the enemy! Take a step back, breath and try to see the bigger picture of the movement...
PS. It is possible to endorse one candidate and support another...
Paul likes Naomi Wolf and
Paul likes Naomi Wolf and Dennis Kucinich, too, but I have no plans to vote for them.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
So you don't support them?
So during Naomi's speech did you just turn it off, or did you support her and listen to what she said? Kucinich, did you support his Impeachment bill or dismiss it as garbage?
Man, Kevin, your just trying to find an enemy everywhere you go...We can support more than one candidate you know.
You aren't hearing me. I am
You aren't hearing me. I am saying that my views on Bob Barr are based on my judgment of whether or not I would vote for him for President, and I wouldn't, based on his record on civil liberties. I wouldn't vote for Dennis Kucinich because he's a socialist, and if Naomi Wolf ran for office, I wouldn't vote for her for the same reason.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
So you can't support Barr...
Kevin, Barr is not the enemy. I know you won't vote for him, but it is possible to support someone you don't vote for. Barr and Baldwin are on our side, and we should support them both, while you vote for one.
If I have said this once, I
have said it a million times... Why would you vote for Barr? He VOTED FOR THE PATRIOT ACT. Now before you go spouting... well it was unintentional, that IS NO EXCUSE. Intentional or not the damage is done. If he was guilty of not reading it, he is lacking in his constitutional duties to the citizens of this country. If he read it and voted for it, well he's a traitor to this country and it's people. He was traitorous because he voted yes. The jig is up. It's too late for the "Im'a Constitutionalist" speech, dont ya think? And NOOOOO it's not possible for me to support someone I wouldn't vote for. If I wouldn't vote for Barr why would I support him?
"If he was guilty of not
"If he was guilty of not reading it, he is lacking in his constitutional duties to the citizens of this country. If he read it and voted for it, well he's a traitor to this country and it's people."
Allow me to interject: Bob Barr is a very well-read, intelligent man. There is no way in the world he voted for the Patriot Act without reading it and without knowing exactly what it stood for.
For that matter, all he had to do was listen to Dr. Paul. Dr. Paul was sounding off on the Patriot Act back in Fall 2001, like Paul Revere.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
I agree with you free! well
I agree with you free! well said!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
If he's running against my
If he's running against my candidate, am I supposed to support him?
I do appreciate your polite tone--compared to other Barr posters who have called Baldwin supporters snake handlers and "Jesus Juice drinkers"--but you still often make no sense.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
:(
I liked Chuck Baldwin until I read that he supports cutting off all trade to China. That would destroy our economy and China's economy considering 70% of everything we own is "made in China." But I could deal with that. Then I read an article he wrote that was totally homophobic which is a deal breaker for me. So I had to choose between a homophobe or an ex-neo con and I've chosen the ex-neo con.
----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul
I would take the homophobe!
I would take the homophobe! homosexuality is perversion .I don't like perverts! but then again its your life if you want to take part in that then its your business not mine.. just don't push it on me.. do what you do in your own bedroom and don't make me accept what you do and accept it as normal.. BECAUSE IT IS NOT!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
The Homophobes vs. The
The Homophobes vs. The Christophobes.
That's what this is all boiling down to, unfortunately.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Yep
seems that some in the Freedom Movement would rather
Major on the Minors - when it comes to the Issues.
Rather than notice that no other candidate stands with Ron Paul on
the major issues - because CB is a Christian Pastor - the minor
family issues get brought up - But, this is only because CB identifies
himself with Jesus Christ - and those specific people don't like that.
So be it - Chuck Baldwin 2008
But let's all be sure to come together in September on the 1st and 2nd.
We have to take over Minneapolis in a big, big way!
Uuhh
I'm not a homosexual. But I have a family member who is and friends who are.
I don't understand the argument when people say "do whatever you want in your own bedroom but don't push it on me!" Do a lot of homosexuals try to get heterosexuals to have same sex relationships? I've certainly never heard a single case.
----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul
Maybe we should ask Larry
Maybe we should ask Larry Craig!
I will give you a couple of cases
First off, I have friends who are too, and relatives who are homosexual too. I am a Christian and believe it is a sin, but I also believe that Christians are NOT to judge unbelievers. What they want to do among themselves is fine with me, but when they push themselves and their lifestyle on me, or mine, I do get a bit upset. A man who was my son's boss where he worked tried to push himself on my son. A female relative tried pushing herself on another of my relatives. And while my 7 year old was having xrays by a homosexual, he tried to get my son alone in the darkroom with him. There, now you have it, 3 cases. And we basically live a sheltered life, homeschooled, etc. I don't speak out about homosexuals in the schools, mostly because it is public school, and it doesn't concern me as I homeschool.
Homosexuals flaunt their
Homosexuals flaunt their sexuality (at least in my neck of the woods). I don't like to see hetrosexuals lip-locked either. There are some things that should be kept private.
I dont want to watch you pee, either.
But they are putting so much homosexual relationship crap on tv, i have to turn the thing off!
They are pushing the agenda on tv. I personally dont care what they do, but I dont want to watch, anymore than I want to watch you pee.
'Gay' plans to target 2-year-olds
I do not hate gay people, nor am I AFRAID of them (homophobic)... lol, that is rediculous, but here is an interesting article:
http://www.worldnetdaily....
Simple question: Why target 2 year olds? I don't get targeting and indoctrinating a child who's mind is only beginning to develop. I just don't get it.
The Gay Plan
The gay plan is to break down the family and get people to feel the narcotic of determining right and wrong for themselves (Gen.3:5). The sad fact is the homo's are being played the same way NWO Rockefellar funded the womens movement.
The Gay Plan? ROFLMAO!
Winner of the "Post of the Night"!
Beware of queer narcotics everyone. They put it in the Zima at their gay meetings.
___________
Lisa C.
“Elections are short term efforts; revolutions are long term projects.”
--Ron Paul
Join the rEVOLution here: http://www.campaignforlib...
What are Israeli policies on
Gays and inter-racial marriages? Yeah, watch out media we are on to your gay publicity agendas.
Right on.
Right on.
Do you remember where...
Do you remember where you read that? I hope that's not true, but I don't want to respond until I see it in writing. Thanks!
Here is the article
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul
I like Baldwin
I like Baldwin, I just wish he would make an effort to be seen in the media....because it hasn't happened, and I hope that changes. He won't convert anyone being a recluse seen only by those in our movement.
Chuck Baldwin will be
Chuck Baldwin will be interviewed Thursday Afternoon on WHO Radio on the Steve Deace Show.
http://www.whoradio.com/m...
My bad...
Good Work Chuck! Keep it up!
What radio show?
I have no idea what that is, and I'm going to guess most people don't either...He needs to get on bigger shows...C'mon chuck.
All true.
http://baldwin08.com/Even...
Funny, nothing listed about the WHO interview here.
for supporters of liberty...
Barr will be on "your World with Neil Cavuto" on Fox News at 4. Tune in!
I think Chuck Baldwin
is the candidate running who is best in agreement with me on the issues that concern me the most. I don't agree with everything he's about, but he's close enough he will most likely have my vote in November.
Baldwin is great! I find it
Baldwin is great! I find it sad that some people are turned off because he is a Christian.
"christianity"
Ron Paul is also a Christian.
There are the "christians" like Ron Paul and Mother Theresa, and then there are the so-called Christians like Hitler and others.... who claim to be Christians are obviously are not.
You really can't throw them all together in one group. Each person needs to be looked at individually.
Agreed, to a certain extent
I like Baldwin, though I really wish he would leave God out of his political speeches. Ron Paul was great that way; he didn't constantly refer to God, which comforted those of us who have watched politicians use the Almighty as a crutch for weak-minded philosophies and empty promises of brighter horizons and days of glory and all that crap.
While I don't think Baldwin fits into that category, and that he would keep his religion out of government policy, I get a little worried when someone who has an unassailable and impressive theologic and religious background, and no need to discuss anything other than the mountain-heap of problems we face as a society regardless of religion, decides still to inject God into political speeches.
That's just my personal opinion, though. I think bringing up God in the political arena inherently cheapens the concept of Him/Her/It, sort of like football players praying and hoping that God gives a rat's ass about who wins that particular game that night. Of course, one could argue the stakes are higher when it comes to our nation's future, but that is where my concept of God differs, and that's a whole other thread :)
For liberty!! *gong*
Ron Paul's Statement of Faith
I believe this is the most eloquent statement about religion and politics I have ever read. This to me speaks volumes about the issue. It is authentic and is not the normal religious pandering that we see in politics. It is Ron Paul through and through.
After discovering Ron Paul last year, the first thing I did after hearing him speak, was to search the internet to see if he believed in the right to life. This statement was what sealed the deal. What an amazing man!
http://www.ronpaullibrary...
Baldwin will save the children
It is with hesitation that I post these comments since there is so much Godlessness in America today and especially by some of the libertine followers of Paul. America's problems are moral and will not be solved by getting the "right person" into positions of authority. America has been kicking God out of the public square for decades. The neo-cons are simply a reflection of our non-religious and non-family culture. Remove the Christian God and you get the obvious results, evolution, chance, meaninglessness, etc. Anyone that sends their children to be dis-educated by the state should be identified as the problem. Culture is Religion externalized.
God was front and center during crusades...
During the crusades, look what happened when God was the center of the universe...
PS. Why do you think the neo-cons support Israel so much?
You're kidding, right?
What exactly do you think your Crusades example proves? Have you ever actually read anything on the Crusades, or are you doing exactly what you condemn Dr. Paul's opponents for doing, namely drawing sweeping conclusions about issues they know nothing about?
The Crusades were such a minor event in the history of Christianity's relationship with Islam that as recently as the 18th century if you had asked a Muslim about the Crusades he would have had absolutely no idea what on God's green earth you were talking about.
And in the 20th century, God wasn't the "center of the universe," as you put it. So did we get peace and love? No, we got Stalin, who presided over an officially atheistic regime. We got the race-worship of Hitler. We got Mao.
In the 18th century, in the 18 months of the Reign of Terror, atheists and deists killed more Catholics than the whole centuries-long history of the Inquisition put together.
Why are some people able to see through political nonsense, but then turn around and repeat the same dumb propaganda when it comes to religion?
I think we should start
I think we should start promoting Chuck, and stop wasting so much of our energy on bashing Barr.
The Barr folks are frustrated by their inability to make inroads here. It shows in their recent posts...it certainly shows in today's posts.
Take the initiative. Start promoting Chuck. The election is only a few months away.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
... as opposed
to Baldwin supporters taking the higher road, and not kicking Barr supporters off buses and calling them trolls whenever they write a pro-Barr thread?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://will86aber.wordpre...
billsebe,
Thanks for this link..... Very moving, and I really liked it.
Sorry, I don't know any
Sorry, I don't know any facts about the bus story.
"Troll" applies to poster BillyDee/JustCantGetEnough, who lived up to the name x 10, and got a lot of people on this Forum stirred up with his relentless, thoughtless and clueless shilling for Barr. If not for that sort of approach, the word "troll" would probably not have been used very often.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
That's it!
"The Barr folks are frustrated by their inability to make inroads here."
I never thought of it, but you are absolutely correct. Their posts smack of frustration. It is so clear to me now.
Do it today............................
Today, we should do what we can to make sure Chuck Baldwin gets his name on the ballot.
http://www.constitutionpa...