Gold is fiat money too
Gold is fiat money too
I want to present a point of view that will most likely be unpopular with DP gold bugs, but that should be important to everyone concerned with their financial future. Gold and its intrinsic value is a perceived value. You can not eat gold, run your car on it or power your house with it. Those of you that are banking on the value of gold being higher in the future are playing the greater fool. While gold may have more value than a declining dollar, it is not the most scarce commodity on the planet. Logic would dictate, if Gold Prices stay high, new exploration will eventually lead to greater supplies, and perhaps lower prices.
Before you give me history lessons on the historical value of gold, remember this; the Romans did not run their chariots on gold and the world population was not pushing 10 billion people when they used gold as the standard to trade goods and services. Energy is the new gold and clean water will eventually become the new oil as it relates to the value of scarce commodities.
We must have energy and water to survive as human beings, everything else is nothing more than a greater fool's marketplace.
Whether our energy is derived from oil, the sun, coal, nuclear sources, or a mule pulling a plow, we can not live without energy.
For that matter, food is nothing more than a storage device for energy.
Prudent people may what to take these facts into consideration and weigh the value of gold speculation verses becoming energy self sufficient. This is the year that the cost of electricity from solar power will drop below the cost of grid-generated power. Prices for solar components are set to drop by next year from about $3.80 per watt to about $1.40 a watt.
The high price of oil is basically a transportation crisis not an energy crisis. There is no substitute for oil [or liquid fuels] in transport, however most of technology is based on electricity, not oil!
While the high price of oil pushes transportation costs up for everything including food, an investment in a backyard garden will outperform an once of gold any day of the week. If your garden is large enough, you can even cancel that expensive gym membership.
Gold can only serve as a hedge against inflation. The cure is to produce it yourself.
output




















Gold is not fiat money
If we enacted Ron Paul's recommendation, Gold would not be fiat money. He was just recommending that people be allowed to use gold in competition with Government-issued dollars.
Gold is fiat money because
Gold is fiat money because it has no more intrinsic value than paper does. That's the point.
It's more valuable than paper because we value it more highly, because it's more rare, etc. But that's a subjective value, not an intrinsic one.
There's a long discussion on this at http://www.dailypaul.com/...
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
Touche
I agree with this theory sir. Gold is just another commodity. Whenever the government attempts to gain control of any commodity then it can be corrupt. Fiat paper currencies are just god damn pieces of paper with a value printed on it. They have no actual value themselves. Gold by itself does not have any value either. The value comes from where we humans place a value on it. The value comes from how we use the gold ie computer microchips. Ask a lion or tiger to try to survive on gold. They cannot. We humans cannot survive off of just gold. In my opinion food, water, and clean air are far more valuable. If we were all to learn to grow our own food, obtain water directly from the atmosphere and not the sodium fluoridated public water supply, and energy from sources besides the energy grid our governments practically force us to use, then perhaps we wouldn't have to worry about whether or not gold has any value or not.
Web Developer
www.writetoredress.com
Take Back Your Country!
Governments monopolies.
That may be true, but I still have an outrageous water bill every month and there is plenty of rain where I live. Price or perceived valued can also be controlled by governments who set up monopoly providers.
grant
But it is really a monopoly?
You can install a tank above your home to collect the rain water.
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
Are you
Are you sure?
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
Some facts on gold for the discussion................
Gold has been called the most beautiful of all chemical elements. Its beauty has made it desirable for use in jewelry, coins, and artwork for thousands of years. It was one of the first pure metals to be used by humans.
Gold is one of the few elements that can affect politics and economics. Wars have been fought over access to gold. Cities and towns have sprung up and died out as gold was discovered and then mined out. Many nations still count their wealth according to the amount of gold they keep in storage.
Gold lies in the middle of the periodic table. The periodic table is a chart that shows how elements are related to one another. Gold is a heavy metal in a group known as the transition metals. Gold is also known as a precious metal (as are platinum and silver).
Large amounts of gold are still used in the manufacture of coins, medals, jewelry, and art. Gold also has a number of uses in industry, medicine, and other applications. For example, one radioactive isotope of gold is commonly used to treat cancer.
SYMBOL
Au
ATOMIC NUMBER
79
ATOMIC MASS
196.9665
FAMILY
Group 11 (IB)
Transition metal
Discovery and naming
Gold objects dating to 2600 B.C. have been found. They were discovered in the royal tombs of the ancient civilization of Ur. These objects showed that humans had already learned how to work with gold this early in history. Some of the gold, for example, had been formed into wires.
One of the special skills developed by the Egyptians was the adding of gold to glass objects. They found a way to use gold to make glass a beautiful ruby-red color. The glass became known as gold ruby glass.
Gold is also mentioned in a number of places in the Bible. A passage in Exodus, for example, refers to the clothing worn by Aaron: "And they did beat the gold into thin plates, and cut it into wires, to work it in the blue, and in the purple, and in the scarlet, and in the fine linen, with cunning work."
Writings from every stage of human history tell of the discovery and use of gold. Roman historian Pliny the Elder (A.D. 23-79), for example, describes gold-mining locations. The Romans found it lying in stream beds in the Tagus River in Spain, the Po River in Italy, the Hebrus River in Thracia (now Greece), the Pactolus River in Asia Minor (now Turkey), and the Ganges River in India.
Gold is both ductile and malleable. Ductile means it can be drawn into thin wires. Malleable means capable of being hammered into thin sheets. A piece of gold weighing only 20 grams (slightly less than an ounce) can be hammered into a sheet that will cover more than 6 square meters (68 square feet). The sheet will be only 0.00025 centimeters (one ten-thousandth of an inch) thick. Gold foil of this thickness is often used to make the lettering on window signs.
Gold is quite soft. It can usually be scratched by a penny. Its melting point is 1,064.76°C (1,948.57°F) and its boiling point is about 2,700°C (4,900°F). Its density is 19.3 grams per cubic centimeter.
Two other important properties are its reflectivity and lack of electrical resistance. Both heat and light reflect off gold very well. But an electric current passes through gold very easily.
Generally speaking, gold is not very reactive. It does not combine with oxygen or dissolve in most acids. It does not react with halogens, such as chlorine or bromine, very easily.
These chemical properties also account for some important uses of gold. Gold coins, for example, do not corrode (rust) or tarnish very easily. Neither does jewelry or artwork made of gold.
Gold occurs in nature in both its native state and in compounds. The native state of an element is its free state. It is not combined with any other element. The most common compounds of gold are the tellurides. A telluride is a compound of the element tellurium and one or more other elements. For example, the mineral calavarite is mostly gold telluride (AuTe2).
At one time, gold was found in chunks or nuggets large enough to see. People mined gold by picking it out of streams and rivers. In fact, gold was once very common in some parts of the world. People valued it not because it was rare, but because it was so beautiful.
The abundance of gold in the Earth's crust is estimated to be about 0.005 parts per million. That makes it one of the ten rarest elements in the Earth's crust. Gold is thought to be much more common in the oceans. Some people believe as much as 70 million tons of gold are dissolved in seawater. They also think there may be another 10 billion tons on the bottom of the oceans. So far, however, no one has found a way to mine this gold.
About a quarter of the world's gold comes from South Africa. Other leading producers of the metal are the United States, Australia, Canada, China, and Russia. In the United States, about two-thirds of its gold is mined in Nevada. California, Montana, Alaska, and South Dakota also produce gold.
There is only one naturally occurring isotope of gold, gold-197. Isotopes are two or more forms of an element. Isotopes differ from each other according to their mass number. The number written to the right of the element's name is the mass number. The mass number represents the number of protons plus neutrons in the nucleus of an atom of the element. The number of protons determines the element, but the number of neutrons in the atom of any one element can vary. Each variation is an isotope.
About two dozen radioactive isotopes of gold are known also. A radioactive isotope is one that breaks apart and gives off some form of radiation. Radioactive isotopes are produced when very small particles are fired at atoms. These particles stick in the atoms and make them radioactive.
One radioactive isotope of gold is widely used in medicine, gold-198. This isotope has two major uses. First, it can be used to study the liver. It is made into a form known as colloidal gold. Colloidal gold consists of very fine particles of gold mixed in a liquid solution. The colloidal gold is injected into the patient's body, where it travels to the liver. There, it can be detected because of the radiation it gives off. The radiation can be used to tell if the liver is functioning normally or not.
In a 1986 study, experts estimated that 121,000 tons of gold had been mined throughout history.
Colloidal gold is also used to treat medical problems. In some forms of cancer, the body develops large amounts of liquid in the space around the stomach and intestines (the peritoneum). One way to treat this collection of liquid is with colloidal gold. The colloidal gold is injected into the peritoneum, it is not able to Leave the peritoneum and go into the stomach and intestines. While in the peritoneum, the colloidal gold gives off radiation. The radiation kills cancer cells that cause the accumulation of fluid.
Some facts on gold for the discussion................
http://www.chemistryexpla...
"It is the responsibility of the patriot to protect his country from its government."
— Thomas Paine
Gold cannot be reproduced! That's the difference!
Deb
Neither can lead. Or coal.
Neither can lead. Or coal. Or granite. Or Clamshells. There are many things that are only generated by natural processes. The only reason to back money with gold is tradition, but that's fallacious.
And then there's this.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
Gold doesn't corrode, rust, or tarnish.
That's a very big reason gold is chosen.
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
FYI
I just heard that the granite counter tops in many homes are radioactive. People are going to be dumping the stuff once the word gets out.
Not all granite is radioactive, only certain kinds.
coal/granite/or clamshells
coal/granite/or clamshells or lead are much more abundant than gold! the reason why gold is more sought after is its rarity! its not tradition.. it takes much more work to find an ounce of gold then an ounce of coal or the other things you mention above!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
Oh my, you really are
Oh my, you really are obtuse.
Replace those things I listed with whatever rare item you like. Those were merely suggestions off the top of my head, they weren't meant as an exhaustive or even serious list.
Sheesh!
The point is that if you want to back paper money with a commodity, it does not have to be gold. Or silver. Or anything else in particular. We like precious metals because we're used to them and they do the job, but lots of things could do the job equally well.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
simple things for simple
simple things for simple minds!
as for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
What? ---------- Liberty for
What?
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
Wrong
If they could do the job equally well or better they would be used as money, not gold or silver. The market didn't just choose gold at random, it was chosen because it is the best type of money.
*sigh*
Do you realize how ignorant that is?
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
Oh my, you really are
Oh my, you really are obtuse.
Actually the only reason
Actually the only reason that gold is used for money is that it is perfect to use for money.
Gold has been used for money
Gold has been used for money because it is one substance that is absolutely suited for the purpose of exchange. It generates the least amount of harm in practice and has been found, throughout history, by numerous civilizations, to possess the steadiest value attainable for economic use. Those civilizations, like our Founders, knew what good money should be, how it should operate and the benefits it should provide, they were not stupid, experience had shown, time and again, that gold was best suited as money. It never had anything to do with either convention or tradition, it had to do with the exchangeability as a monetary unit.
Gold and silver cannot be artificially or arbitrarily increased or decreased, they also have the distinct trait of being fully accepted as final payment for all debts, without question as to money value because they carry no inherent liability as money. The point in history when people realized that the money value of gold, and even silver will always be the same when free coinage is allowed is unknown, but at some point, they realized that perfect attribute of the commodities.
How long are you going to
How long are you going to pretend you haven't seen my several pleas to get you to answer this?
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
Your questions were, to say
Your questions were, to say the least, lacking in any logical need to answer. Questions regarding the wetness of water, and if humans were not on earth what would be the value of gold....
Honestly, I considered such questions outside the framework of reason, therefore they didn't beg for an answer. Sorry
I consider that a
I consider that a copout.
It's very simple: intrinsic has a meaning; that meaning does not apply to the value of gold.
The water example was used to illustrate the meaning. This was followed by a single question, not several, and not about water or humans, but gold.
But of course you know this, you're simply waffling.
I've constructed a logical obstacle that you are unable to surmount. Just concede the point, it's not the end of the world.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
You may consider it what you
You may consider it what you like, the truth of the matter is that your questions did not qualify as such to breach the issue of the meaning or definition. Your construction was based upon extreme hypothetical, particularly concerning value based solely upon the existence of man on earth.
The myriad of expressions in the natural world, whether mineral or organic, must by that very existence, have some intrinsic value, whether that value is placed upon that mineral or organic substance by man or not, the mere fact that it exist in the first place is the imbuing of value. In the natural world, if it preformed no function to that world at all, in some capacity of value, whether recognized by mankind or not, remains inherently valuable. Otherwise, we [mankind] would have never formed an inquisitive mind to discover such values. Existence itself denotes value. Now, concerning the definition of value is based upon judgment. Obviously, the most compelling evidence that gold has intrinsic value is the fact that men place such value upon it. As long as men place intrinsic value in gold, it has intrinsic value, if you choose not to place such value upon gold then, by all means, that is your prerogative, once again, it is a matter of judgment, and based upon history the judgment is that there is intrinsic value in gold, as with other materials.
You can pose all the questions you like about the sound of one hand clapping, but the fact is that whether a mineral or substance has a particular quality or numerous qualities that imbue value upon that mineral or substance, it has, within those qualities value.
Existence does not make value.
Value comes from usefulness and scarcity. If there is something in the world that exists that no one has a use for, it will have zero value. Likewise, if there is something in the world that is in unlimited supply it will have no value. That is, it will have zero price. In order for something to have value, it must be both limited in supply and useful to someone. The combination of an object's scarcity and usefulness is what determines the relative value of one object versus other objects.
This is the subjective theory of value, which underlies Austrian economics.
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
You say even less, with even
You say even less, with even more words, than Obama.
Just answer the question: what is the value of gold, or anything else, without people to value it?
If your answer is "there is no value," as it clearly must be, all that means is that you've got to accept that the value of gold is subjective.
That's OK! Your monetary theory doesn't have to collapse just because you can't extract this ethereal thing called "value" with a hammer and chisel.
And even if it does collapse, you should welcome the chance to rebuild it upon solid ground rather than sand. You don't want to be running off at the mouth in defense of a house of cards, do you?
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
What value did gold have
What value did gold have prior to mankind understanding its qualities, it was exactly the same prior to that understanding as it was after that understanding, the qualities of gold were there, it was not our estimation of value that created that value, it was qualities there were already present within the gold. Our discovery of those qualities was just that, we recognized the value locked within those qualities, therefore, we recognized the value of such qualities, whether that value is based upon some functional utility or the particular characteristics of the metal. The value of everything is exactly the same with or without people, your estimation of value is not subjective as you state because all value is simply based upon the qualities within the substance itself, innate qualities that exist with or without the presence of man. There may well be several chemical elements that we have yet to discover, does that actually mean that simply because we, in all our self-assigned glory, have yet to either discover those elements mean that they have no value? I don’t think so.
I fully understand your stance however, it assumes that man is necessary to imbue value on any and every substance in the universe, that is simply not the case. I will turn your question around on you, if man did not exist, what value to life on earth would gold have, well obviously you and I could never adequately answer that in a factual manner. There are numerous planets, solar systems and galaxies, what value are they, what position in the universe do they hold and do they hold value within the scheme of things or, since we have not discovered the reason behind them are they simply place-holders with no function. Similarly, why is it that in Quantum Physics that Quarks, and possible Leptons don’t move unless they are being observed?
While the conception of value is a human quality, that quality is based upon the recognition of certain elemental qualities within various substances. If we limit our understanding of value to simply being a human trait relying upon humans to assign value for value to exist denies a great deal of understanding to us in our world and universe.
If you accept that gold is subjective then your ability to explore or recognize value as a quantitative measure is then reduced to the ridiculous. The truth of the matter is that we, as humans, place both subjective and objective value on a whole host of materials, the question is what difference does it make?
You last paragraph shot in from some left-field that appears to be more of an emotional strike on your part then, once again, an actual attempt at logical construction. Are you upset? That certainly appears to be the case, if so, the by all means I apologize for upsetting your need to delve into the more metaphysical meanings of value of gold, whether subjectively or objectively. I think it is you that has the hammer in hand.
From your words, it appears that it is you who find the need to cling to your own doctrine. So, if it will make you feel any better I will gladly agree that you are correct, there, doesn't that feel better now?
Once again you post so much
Once again you post so much that my head swims. Why must you be so verbose? I could have boiled that down to a sentence or two.
We did not "discover" the value of the qualities of gold (I am happy to see that you've stopped calling value a quality in its own right), we placed subjective value on those qualities. Had we never given them value, they would not have any.
We cannot place objective value; what is objective is true without regard to us, as in the wetness of water.
I am only upset that you've so stubbornly refused to concede the point when you know you've lost the argument. And yes, if your concession is sincere, it does make me feel better. I'm glad to have helped open your eyes.
Next up: debunking supernatural deities (just kidding). :-)
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
It appears that different definitions of "value"
are being used in this thread. In economics, when we talk of "value" we're talking about exchange value or price. A thing that has no price has no value. Using "value" in the economic sense, gold does not have value until someone wants it.
Is it possible for an object to have undiscovered usefulness? Yes, but until that usefulness is discovered, it's not going to have exchange value. No one is going to use it for anything.
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
You're right, but we've been
You're right, but we've been arguing intrinsic value, which nothing can possess, since intrinsic qualities are objective qualities, without regard to observation. Gold is yellow in a universe with or without humans, but it is only valuable in a universe with humans. Thus, the value of gold is not objective, but subjective. It is not intrinsic, but contingent on our valuation.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
In terms of exchange value
In terms of exchange value the history of the last 5000 years or so lend validation to the intrinsic value of gold. Additionally, the fact that gold became widely used as a monetary metal in various areas around the world almost simultaneously, with very different people, different languages, different cultures and with very different systems of value assessment, yet it became a monetary unit valued for exchange all over the world. No other metal did that, the closest of course was silver. For a while in Egypt, silver was valued more than gold simply because they had far less silver than they did gold.
Gold has been used for money because it is one substance that is absolutely suited for the purpose of exchange. It generates the least amount of harm in practice and has been found, throughout history, by numerous civilizations, to possess the steadiest value attainable for economic use. Those civilizations, like our Founders, knew what good money should be, how it should operate and the benefits it should provide, they were not stupid, experience had shown, time and again, that gold was best suited as money. It never had anything to do with either convention or tradition, it had to do with the exchangeability as a monetary unit.
Gold and silver cannot be artificially or arbitrarily increased or decreased, they also have the distinct trait of being fully accepted as final payment for all debts, without question as to money value because they carry no inherent liability as money. The point in history when people realized that the money value of gold, and even silver will always be the same when free coinage is allowed is unknown, but at some point, they realized that perfect attribute of the commodities.
It is apparent that you feel the need to now assign usefulness as a quality to assign value, while that is true in the most elemental sense, there would be no way to assign value without the usefulness in it natural state, the usefulness would have to pre-exist, therefore if the usefulness pre-exist then so too, does the value.
You're confusing
"intrinsic value" with "objective value." You're referring to the latter.
Gold has objective value, meaning it's useful whether or not we have discovered it's useful. That's all your saying.
We have to distinguish between "exchange value," "intrinsic value," and "objective value," for conversations about value to be coherent.
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
Believe me, I fully and
Believe me, I fully and completely understand the differences between the various definitions you are making regarding value, however, my contention is that it simply does not matter, well except maybe to you.
Gold is, in economic terms, a medium of value, it has been for thousands of years. If you decide that you prefer not to accept the historical context of that value then by all means continue on your way, but if you look at the record of history as a base of understanding, whether it be in economic terms or artistic or cultural then you must admit that history has consistently shown that gold has an "intrinsic" value on a number of levels.
If it had not had such characteristics then it would have not had such a long-running record of use. It would have been like other forms of money used, if it had no intrinsic value then we would be having this discussion about sea shells instead. Why did sea shells, or salt, or wampum not be viewed as a consistent source of value when they too have been used as monetary units? I mean if there was no difference between the value of gold and the value of sea shells, they why are we not using sea shells, they are much more plentiful and cheaper to "mine".
The answer should be obvious, they had no intrinsic value, not on a cultural level or a historical level. Now if we were talking about sea shells, or wampum, then I would totally agree with you, but we are not, we are talking about a metal that has shown itself over thousands of years to be intrinsically valuable, if you prefer to say that over the millennia mankind placed a subjective value on gold then so be it, it doesn’t matter in the least. If it makes you feel better then, by all means believe that, but the track record of gold contradicts you assumptions.
To have actual intrinsic value
would mean something would have value in itself irrespective of its usefulness.
Gold does not have that. Nothing does.
There are manifold reasons that we prefer to use gold over sea shells. These include that they're not as scarce, they disintegrate too easily, and you break off a piece and still have a sea shell (in other words it's not fungible). If we had no access to gold, maybe we would choose sea shells.
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
"To have actual intrinsic
"To have actual intrinsic value would mean something would have value in itself irrespective of its usefulness. Gold does not have that. Nothing does."
Exactly. I'm glad somebody else gets it, because this is getting frustrating.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
OMG!
OMG!
You had
an ephiphany?
(note there was a typo above. It should say it's not longer a seashell. Or in other words, it you break a seashell into several peieces, you don't have several seashells. You can break a piece of gold into several pieces and have several pieces of gold. It's uniform throughout.)
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
NO, please, never
NO, please, never underestimate who you are speaking with. I am just amazed that we concern ourselves with such useless dribble, the fact is that gold, whether intrinsic valued or subjectively valued, is one of the best monetary metals known in history. IT DOES NOT MATTER ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, that is what I have tried to impart to FUBAR, or whatever his name is. The historical fact is that gold has served a particular purpose and has consistently held a particular place throughout the history of civilized man, there is a reason for that.
No offense, but I had
No offense, but I had overestimated you before we began this long exchange over intrinsic value. I used to think you were a bright guy, and I still do, but I now see that you are stubborn to the point of cutting off your nose to spite your face.
And the above comment makes the reason clear: you think too highly of yourself.
Guess what, Republicae? You don't have a clue about this subject.
Sorry.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
I am way too old to be
I am way too old to be offended. Actually, I have shown no more stubbornness on the subject than you have, perhaps we both can stand on the stage to accept that award. Don’t get me wrong, I fully understand and see your point of view, and it is not that I think it is necessarily wrong, I just don’t think that it is necessarily completely correct. There are several factors that you have neglected to enter into your views about gold, perhaps the most compelling is that of the long historic value that gold has held over the last 5 or 6 millennia. It has maintained its place in history despite history, it has maintained its value as money despite the efforts of numerous governments to destroy its value as money. Even now, gold effects the fiat monetary system in ways that few people seem to grasp. Also, concerning value, it has also proven its value as a monetary unit of exchange through the years when fiat monetary systems fail, they always, without exception return to the sound monetary system of gold. It appears to be almost timeless and perhaps the most tangible monetary commodities ever to be used. As a store of value, whether intrinsic or not, it retains a value that cannot be duplicated in other monetary systems.
I haven't neglected those
I haven't neglected those historical factors. I've simply recognized that they don't impart intrinsic value. They are interesting and important, but irrelevant to this particular discussion.
It's also important to keep in mind that the historical use of gold as money doesn't even say anything definitive about its subjective value (let alone its objective value, which is nonexistent), as illustrated by the appeal to tradition fallacy.
Again, the history is compelling, but it imparts no intrinsic value, nor does it necessarily prove that gold is the best subjective choice.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
after reading some of the
after reading some of the posts below.... I still can not believe some of you actually still believe the bullshit your high school teachers and college professors taught you about gold! it was all lies! it was all brain washings!
if you want to know what gold really is.. bone up on your world history for the last 5000 years+..... not what some marxist tought you in the government reeducation camps! get a clue folks!
I've noticed that you enjoy
I've noticed that you enjoy calling people completely inappropriate names (Marxist, Communist, etc.), and telling them they're clueless, but you never seem to get around to enlightening us with your supreme wisdom. And every time I've called you out on something, you've suddenly lost interest in those threads.
I don't know how old you are, but I get the feeling that you're either relatively young or relatively old. You seem to believe you know everything, much like a teenager, but you also appear to be too deeply invested in your beliefs to make any concessions, like an older person.
----------
Liberty for Dummies
----------
Democrats want to be your mommy.
Republicans want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want to treat you like an adult.
Gold is the only real money
That is why the $USD was backed by Gold and became the worlds Reserve Currency. Early on the dollar was as good as Gold because the dollars could be exchanged for Gold. There may not have been many reasons for ordinary people to exchange there dollars for Gold, but if they wanted to they could. The Gold held by nations was used to settle international trade account balances.
Over time TPTB(The Powers That Be) were able to deceitfully convince the spineless, ignorant greedy politicians, and the hapless, worn down US citizens that a fractional reserve banking system was the way to go for a stable monetary system. The Gold Reserve in the US vaults was still, if only fractionally, backing the $USD.
The whole global monetary system was based on Gold as late as 1944 when the US reigned supreme and forged the Bretton Woods Agreement linking all global currencies to the $USD, with the $USD then being valued in Gold. So in effect all global currencies were linked to Gold, albeit through the $USD.
In 1933 the US Govt. led by FDR took the right of US citizens to own Gold away via legal tender laws, preventing them from using it to pay off public or private debts. In 1971 the US Govt. led by Nixon turned away foreign request to exchange US Treasury Securities (notes, bills, and bonds) for Gold. The US should have officially been declared bankrupt at that point for breaking its fiduciary contract obligations.
So the TPTB were able to force the US Govt. off the Gold Standard and convince the American People and the rest of the world that we do not need anything to back our currencies other than the US Govt'. implicit guarantee, backed by it' ability to collect enough money from the American People via the income tax, to pay any debts that it may incur.
What a grand scheme they, TPTB were able to pull off. They counted on the control of the Media and the ignorance of the masses. Man did they hit the jackpot. I guess that is what we get when we put are trust in other men. Of course, we did not put our trust in man, we put our trust in God, just like it said, and still does say on the notes and coins of our currency.
Misplaced trust will burn your eyes out, apparently that is what has happen to this nation and it' money supply. We have trusted men that we thought had the nations best interests at heart. Through control of the lame stream media, TPTB have convinced almost everybody that Gold is an old relic and we are in a new era where money can be created out of thin air and that it is ok to be backed by Govt. decree, commonly referred to as FIAT money.
The time is near when the $USD will all but collapse due to the precarious financial situation that our nation finds itself in. We have let TPTB construct a reality that looks Orwellian to me. Very few people seem to understand how bad or how close we are to the edge of financial disaster and all the associated usurpations of our rights and freedoms that the Govt. is ready to take as they pretend to save us from some evil.
The US and the world have been on a grand experiment in money for the last few generations. The problem is that we the people really did not know or understand what was going on with our money supply. We expect to be able to trust those in charge of our nations monetary system to do the right thing. Well that experiment has failed us miserably. If we had paid attention to history we would understand why our founding fathers wrote the constitution as they did and called for real money to be of Gold and Silver.
Try not listen to people who try their hardest to give you reasons why Gold has lost its role as real money, because it hasn't. TPTB will try to move heaven and earth to save their FIAT system, after all they are the ones that gain the most from it. Be on the look out, the signs are there, protect yourself and your family, get some Gold and get some Silver.
Captian
"Over time TPTB(The Powers That Be) were able to deceitfully convince the spineless, ignorant greedy politicians, and the hapless, worn down US citizens that a fractional reserve banking system was the way to go for a stable monetary system. The Gold Reserve in the US vaults was still, if only fractionally, backing the $USD."
Thoughout the history of the US monetary system, since the time Drafting of the Constitution, the Dollar has NEVER been fully backed by deposits of metal. There is no period of time in the history of our country when we were NOT on a Fractional Reserve.
If by fiat you mean...
"enforced by law" then yes, any money that is not barter is automatically fiat.
But usually when we say "fiat" we mean "whose only value is that established by the government.
Of course if gold is required to be artificial tender, then its value does disproportionately increase relative to its worth to society without tender. AND there will be natural inflation/deflation cycles as the gold supply fluctuates and as the economy goes up and down.
However, the point is by requiring the government to back its currency, we take inflationary power out of the hands of people who should never have it, and leave it to the relatively headless market. That is why being pro-gold (or pro-silver, or pro-platinum) is a pro-liberty position.
"Being pro-gold is a pro-liberty position."
Indeed. But advocating free banking, as I do, is also a pro-liberty position.
People confronted with my ideas tend to fall back on the same hackneyed "Down with the Fed!" arguments that they have always used. But I abhor central banking every bit as much as they do.
The relevant question is: What is the best alternative to having a central bank and how might it arise in a realistic scenario that does not involve grandiose pronouncements from self-important economists who do not actually have any authority?
I have outlined such a scenario at www.axiomaticeconomics.co...
Shaka,
not to knock your idea of Free Banking, as I, like most others, enjoy anything that's free. But I'm sure you realize that we have had a period in our history in which we DID have Free Banking. And that under this free banking system, the stronger banks actually, and naturally, began to function as Central Banks. These were private banks, just our our current Federal Reserve is a private bank. And you abhor Central Banks, but the system you propose will essentially produce a central banking system. There is a difference of Theory, and real world. Usually, theory sounds real good, (such as Marxism) but only exist within one's head...
Free Banking combined with a
Free Banking combined with a free monetary system without government intervention, or central banking intervention is the way to go!
You're right on that account!
Thanks.
I don't think that we're really all that far apart in our thinking.