Denver Citizen Attacked By Rogue Police

To the front page....maybe something else can be done!!

http://digg.com/world_new...

The people in Denver need to unite. They need to drive the Police Chief and the mayor to absolute DISTRACTION for allowing this sort of treatment to their brothers. This is unconstitutional and just plain wrong. I know when the police here were rude to me, I called the mayor, and when the NEW mayor came in I talked to him at length. He promised the "public servants" would get much nicer, and they now are. SO even one complaint worked wonders.

These guys are goons of the first degree. Look up Ishmael Mena, and see how they treat mexicans that are here legally. Of course, those without correct papers are sheltered, Denver is called a refuge city, or something like that.

THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost

for those cops to have everything that they intended to have happen to the victim, happen to them, including having two teeth knocked out of the cop that slammed the victim's head into the pavement. Oh, also, the cops should personally have to pay for the victim's medical bills, and for pain and suffering.

Probably the worse thing that will happen to the cops, however, is getting fired.

Why the hell is there always such deferrel to "internal investigations" in these situations. The video does not lie. These lying asshole cops blatantly attacked this man. They should be charged with ATTEMPTED MURDER.

A rush to judgment my ass.
_________________________________

My liberty-minded home base of thought:

www.ponderthis.net

in my Devil's Dictionary, www.axiomaticeconomics.co...

Rainey, Willie: “We overplay the Black card as an issue,” he says, referring to allegations of racism in the shooting of Sean Bell. Yes they do. The problem is thuggery and gangsterism in police departments, not racism. The victim of the Stark County strip search was White. That’s how they treat everybody.

I'll add a definition about this video and link the definitions. But could someone tell me that man's name, please? The audio is poor on my laptop and all I got was his first name, John.

Thanks.

p.s. For those who haven't already guessed, "Shaka" is Victor Aguilar. I'll just speak in the first-person from now on, as talking about myself in the third-person was a bit awkward.

They broke his teeth! They broke his teeth! They should be arrested and jailed.

I hope they hang.

"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever." - Thomas Jefferson

i get more and more disgusted with the things going on in this country. makes me want to puke

Assaulting a citizen for no reason, then charging him with a crime, then lying under oath... That sounds like at least 10 years

Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom" and "Revolutionary Business"
visit www.mikeandjake.com

As citizens of the United States of America, we must understand that we are the rulers of our own lives and each of us holds sovereign rights over our bodies and liberties.

We must also understand that when police officers or government officials break the law they no longer hold any authority what so ever. In the instant they act outside the law and under color of authority or jurisdiction we have a right and duty to resist.

Below are some very interesting court decisions and legal precedents in which honorable judges and juries have found the right to resist with mortal force is the right of all free citizens.

The police departments should be made of aware of these facts. Maybe that will raise some eyebrows instead of lethal tasers.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”

“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.

“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.

“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).

“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).

“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.

As for grounds for arrest: “The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” (Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197)ot be televised... It will be downloaded!!!

this is the accepted behavior of a police state enforcer (we won't have humane police until we have humane laws)...

Sorry, didn't mean to give away the ending.. but it's true. The internal investigation will show that the cops did nothing wrong, they operated within the limits of the law.

Didn't you know that's how the outcome of investigations of yourself are? Just look at that police chief. To say they did something wrong would be a rush to judgement? He's viewed the video, which clearly shows wrongdoing, and he won't even say that they should not have slammed his face into the ground. And he won't ever say that either.

I tell you what, I am so glad I stopped watching the show COPS in a way that had me worshiping the cops and always hating the bad guys. I still watch the show, mostly to allow me to see how different things can happen. It helps you be alert to the dangers you may face. Cars driving crazy running from cops, etc. It allows me to understand what may happen, how it may happen, and learn to lookout for it and be prepared. But I don't watch it now thinking the cops are always right no matter what they do.

The more I watch REAL news taken by civilians, the less I trust the police. I never thought I would ever feel that way. I will show respect to the police when required, but I refuse to look to them for safety anymore. Time and time again, it has been shown that you are not always safe when you are in the hands of the police. That's sad that most of the country cannot see that. Oh well, one day the chickens will come home to roost and it will be those sheep being targeted by out of control cops.

The battle today is not between conservatives and liberals or Republicans and Democrats. It is a battle between Americans and globalists. ~ Chuck Baldwin

They're just your average police who just happen to get caught on tape.

And no, so called "good cops" have the pack mentality and though they may be less brutal, they know that when they blow their lid they are going to need their more vicious brethren to cover for them.

Welcome to the modern police state -- get up against the wall and spread your legs so we can knock your teeth the **** out.

And use it when necessary, regardless of who the attacker is.

Keepin' it reaul.

"Committed To The Erradication Of Poverty Among Patriots"