If RNC rejects Ron Paul by denying him nomination, I will cast vote for Ralph Nader
I supported both Ron Paul and Mike Gravel while their campaign bids for president "last".
I saw Obama's acceptance speech to the huge audience at the stadium on C-SPAN. Run of the mill politicking with a lot of promises on "change". Can he keep his words unlike George H.W. Bush's "Read my lips. No new taxes"?
I hope one of the four "third party" candidates Bob Barr (the only presidential candidate on the ballot in Texas?!), Cynthia McKinney, Chuck Baldwin and Ralph Nader make an impact on the election, like 1912 Presidential Election did to effect an electoral outcome that changed history -- for better or worse.
Obama/Biden may talk about "taking back" America in speeches at DNC after 8 torturous years of disastrous and failed policies of Bush-Cheney administration, but they won't represent real change. A real revolutionary change goes the long way without Ron Paul and other real patriots being president elect.
I'm voting Nader after RNC insists on McCain and deliver nomination to him. I heed Dr. Paul's advice not to write him in because it's a "wasted vote" in his view.
If you want to know I would vote for Nader, rent the 2006 documentary "An Unreasonable Man" on DVD.
output




















Voting Nader isn't something
Voting Nader isn't something I'd do, but it's better than voting Two (NWO) Party.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
lol Same here
I don't care and didn't read your paragraph either.
The only thing I read was the guy's post below mine.
This is a Ron Paul site -- why would anyone but trolls care?
ya know what?
I really dont care who you vote for. Really I dont. Didnt even really read your reasons why you like Nader. I couldnt care less. But I have a DEEP respect for you for being the kind of American who will VOTE HIS/HER CONSCIENCE. We need ALOT more like you.
www.dvds4delegates.com