Jesse's Speech & Immigration
I was glad to hear Jesse's speech, and for all he brings to the table. However, I would like to respond to his comments re: immigration and "brown skinned people we all are afraid of". The main issue with illegal immigration is financial. The American People should not be responsible for support and freebies to illegal immigrants, when we are finding it difficult to fulfill promises to our own citizens who have paid taxes, Social Security taxes, and Medicare taxes all their lives. We fully welcome our southern neighbors who immigrate to our country legally. But as an American, I am enraged when my government uses OUR money to encourage our country to be overrun will illegals who suck our money when it should be rightfully spent on our own citizens.
output




















Jesse Ventura is a
like-able guy , but I have to wonder why he is in Mexico and not here fighting the fight with us? Dr. Paul has been on the "front lines" for a long time and hasn't backed down. If Ventura wants to run for President in 2012, shouldn't he be here? He sounded a little arrogant if you ask me...too many self references. Dr. Paul never uses any references to "I" (meaning himself) to promote Liberty.
I loved that Jesse brought
I loved that Jesse brought up his stance on immigration. The first reason I think it was awesome is because I agree with him. The second reason I think it was awesome is that probably 95% percent of the people at the rally disagreed with him but he still said it anyways. Jesse Ventura is fearless. He even talked about 9-11. His speech was probably my favorite one of the night.
Ron Paul's was also awesome as always.
Interesting observation
That's a very good thing. I agree.
Ron Paul more closely
Ron Paul more closely matches my own views on illegal immigration(he warned that its gotten out of control and almost has become like an invasion now) than Ventura. Sounds like Ventura has been around too many liberals, or watching too much liberal news, he seems to be actually pro-illegal immigration,pro-amnesty, and doesn't seem to think illegal immigration is any big deal and anyone who opposes it must be racists or xenophobes. Because Ventura takes this view, I could never support him. If I can't vote for Ron Paul, I'll be voting for Chuck Baldwin. RP has spoken highly of him and his views on the issues are quite close to RP's and Baldwin seems serious about wanting to stop illegal immigration, far more than obama or mccain.
http://www.betterimmigrat...
There's a distinction between his view and that of liberals
Liberals tend to favor free-immigration + welfare goodies.
Jesse just supports the former.
Treg, I agree.
NO FENCE!! What a stupid idea a fence is ... and the whole philosophy of a fence is a lie. All I'm saying, is end the financial part of it. That's the part that stinks. I went to get a mammogram last year, and guess what. If I'm an illegal immigrant, I can get it for free. Since I'm a taxpaying American Citizen, it cost me $400. $400 I couldn't afford, either. You have to agree with me, something is really really wrong here. I agree with what you're saying, too ... if a person has to jump through all the many many hoops, why not just do it illegally?
And, all people and situations are different, we can't generalize that every situation fits what we've been saying. But what I'm saying is that a country that's drowning in debt ... to the point of downfall of the country ... it's ridiculous for that country to pay billions of dollars to folks who have never paid their dues, when the legal citizens aren't even being taken care of. It would be ridiculous for me to go illegally across the border into Columbia and expect them to pay me to live.
I work in healthcare. Let me tell you ... the folks who have the hardest time getting their care paid for are the VETERANS!! Next are the older folks on Medicare. The people that get care the easiest, ... guess who ... the folks on Medicaid. In the state where I live, 1 out of every 5 people get paid by Medicaid. And in the town where I live, it is more than 50% Mexican. A very very high percentage of those are illegal immigrants. I live with them. I work with them. I like them. But they have no right to money they haven't earned, just like the rest of us.
on the fence...
remember any fence / wall designed to keep them out will also keep you IN!
wej ust need to remove the incentive for Illegals and they will go home ( at least the ones who don't want to become American citizens )
"Great men do not seek power, they have great power thrust upon them" - Klingon proverb
www.myspace.com/chapel_of...
www.ronpaul2008.com
i heard ron paul was for
i heard ron paul was for building the fence ?????
There's nothing wrong with
There's nothing wrong with the idea of the fence---except that it would be built by a rogue government.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
What about private property dude?
The so-called emiment domain...
Or are you implying that it would be fine if it would be built by homeowners themselves (and not the gov't) that live on the Mexico-US border?
The problem with saying "end
The problem with saying "end the welfare state" is that it isn't a solution, because we all know it won't be implemented.
I have mixed views on illegal immigration, though. I used to be 100% against it, but lately, I'm 100% against the encroaching police state. It's hard to hold both points of view simultaneously. Not unlike Dr. Paul's change of mind on capital punishment. With a government this bent, I'm not even comfortable with them enforcing leash laws for pets.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
As born American...here is what I think of "legal" immigration.
Let me tell you (truthsanityalways) what you are SAYING each and every time you mouth the Nazi-Republican refrain,
"Well, as long as they came here legally I am ok with it".
Here is what you are saying. "I want you to go through INS hell."
That is what you are saying.
Well I have a Question: Have you ever lost your drivers licence and had to go down to DMV and wait in line, fill out forms, get photographed, pay fines/fees, take a test, etc?
Question: Did you enjoy that experience? It was all "legal". Do you feel the test could separate out the bad drivers from the good?
Question: Are you always so rightous and legal? Did you drive "legally" to work today? Went no faster than 55 mph did you? It seems to me that illegal immigration issue is a government created problem, like many others, such as the drug war, and massive amounts of "illegal" speeders each and every day, thus ensuring that we are all weary of the police.
Well if you are like most Americans you dread the thought of having to go down to the department of Motor Vehicles, DMV, and "go through the legal process".
Question: How would you FEEL about the DMV "legal process" if it was say, on steroids? That is, it was 50 times more beauocratic, 50 times more rules to follow, 50 times more forms to fill out, 50 times the fees, 50 times more humiliating, and 50 times ....no, a 1000 times longer? That is what the INS "legal process" is all about today.
I know. I met my future wife will traveling and vactioning in latin america. That was 2000. Yesterday 2008, she became a US citizen. We feel as though we have run the obstical course on a marathon of legalities and fees and paperwork.... MEANINGLESS paperwork at that! And the "citizenship test" was totally bogus. ....I mean, really, "Lincoln freed the slaves"? Further, should Bush invade Iran and Iran launch a viral bug war, perhaps we will be heading south, far South, perhaps as far as Bush in his 20,000 acre ranch in Uraguay. Perhaps he knows something about wind currents that we dont.
Are we "done" with this LEGAL immigration process now that she is finally an American citizen? Heck No! After 7 hellish years, we still have more to go. Now we must go back through the process, get a new Social Security number, refile it as an American Citizen, go through the process for New Passports which means new pictures AGAIN (They have ten on file), new fees, new forms, and we must write in to deactivate my wife's Work Permit which as as Stay at Home mom she did not want in the first Place, but had to have just to be able to get a drivers license! Crazy? Si, Mucho Loco. Oh, and did I mention, another trip to DMV to submit new paperwork showing she is an american citizen and GET a New Drivers Licence!
Now comes the fun part, the really fun part. We must start again with my adopted son and all that must be done. Oh the joys of going to elementary school with all new paperwork, forms, and name changes.
Now, you may be thinking, "Well if you want to live here, that's the price you must pay". Except that is the price I must pay. Not her. Me. I, as an American Citizen had to "go through it". It was me, not her, who had to give up 4 years tax returns. It was me, not her, who had to swear to this and to that and to submit to be interviewed etc,....all in exchange for me to have the freedom to bring into this country the woman that I love. It is me, the American citizen who gets awarded the Visa, that I inturn grant to a foreign individual. I am the one who "qualifies" under the INS "legal system".
You can bet I resented each and every minute of it. I found it especially ....amazing that there was not ANY OTHER WAY.
Now, let me back up. Let me ask you, What if the foreign person does not want to be an American citizen? My wife was never especially thrilled with the idea of becoming an American citizen, (except for the American Passport which is an E ticket that gets you into any country around the world, just about). Well, such is the case with my wife's mother. My childrens grandmother likes the USA Tourist Visa we got for her. She just visits 3 or 4 months out of the year and goes back to be with her other grand children. Nice arrangement, every one is happy, well not so fast. Some INS agent thought otherwise and did not like our happy arrangement of our traveling grandma.
Upon the last entrance into the USA, the INS agents stamped her Tourist Visa "one last time" and announced that "She should apply to be a US citizen if she wants to just come into America again". Furious, we raced off to our two immigration attorneys, "Can they do that? Can they just end a perfectly valid turist visa, just because?" Answer: "YES, they have all the powers of your local police, without ANY restrictions or CITIZEN RECOURSE. You are lucky they stamped her turist visa entering the USA for the 4 time in two years. They could have just sent her back, retained her visa, and denied entry. They could have, on a whim, just decided to strip search her, body cavity check and all, just because they dam well can. No "propable cause", no proof, no nothing is needed. And you have no recourse to sue the INS agent who does this or says mean insulting things or even a strip search. They have full power that local police could only dream of having. There are no cameras. The INS and officiers, while physically ON USA soil, are on a legal fiction, as in fictionally not on USA soil and thus don't have to abide by say, allowing an attorney to be present, right to represent, and so forh. They do have a process, but we hear all the horror stories. Nothing a US citizen can do about. Get your wife's Grandmother a dam USA citizenship if she ever wants to visit her little grandkids for Christmas and birthdays again."
How is that? How does that sit with my fellow RP R3VOLutionary Patriots?
Now comes the real rub. Grandma says she has no desire to give up her citizenship. She has several daughters with children and would miss them dearly. Besides, she "doesn't like what she sees in America" ....."In my country", she says, "we don't fuss over IDs for everything. We don't have eagle and bear companies trying to sue you for anything. We can buy a beer at a resturant and go for a walk with it. I don't feel so free in America. There are safe places in America, but so many dangerous places too. I feel more comfortable in my beachside town of Cartagena."
For those of you who did not catch that. That is Cartagena Colombia. She feels more freedom in her little beach side city in Colombia, than in the hot desert of Phoenix Arizona. And it may just be the wave of the future, that is, Americans finding freedom OUT of the USA. Jesse Ventura is just one of millions who choose to live outside of the USA. In my world of high dollar commercial real estate, many multimillionares have given up their citizenship, staked their claim in the countries of Panama, and New Zealand.
The bottom line ECONOMICALLY is this. NAFTA came to Mexican subsidized farms, and blew the lid off of that system. Socialized farming, via oil profit transfers, made for small farms and many workers. Now that NAFTA opened the borders to trade, farming goods grew competitive, and millions of marginal farm laborers where no longer needed on the farms. American farms on the other hand, needed low cost farm workers. So since 1990, strong natural MARKET FORCES have driven low cost workers North and high cost production South. That was that "Woosh" sound that Ross Perot warned the country about when Bill Clinton and George Bush Sr promised to support the NAFTA tready.
I can agree with doctor Paul that we do not need to subsidize or welfarize the immigration problem. But Doctor Paul was never for having a Border Fence. He states that plainly in one of the debates last year, and distances himself from the likes of Tom Tancredo, who if anyone has a bad case of Anti-brown People phobia, its that man. What Dr. Paul does not want to see is the economic insentives to travel North change and suddenly become the Welfare insentives to Go North. I do think we as Americans all have the right to hire and fire who we want. I am not for unionizing the American workforce as defacto citizenship.
Further, I can agree with Lew Rockwell's speech that the USS of A is here and that the Conservatives are showing their true selves as facsit Statist Nazis who desire to keep "all the brown people out" as Jesse Ventura says. Rockwell is correct about Ron Paul. He managed to stay in the game by being a republican party member. But even better, Dr. Paul managed to be a true Statesman by ignoring BOTH the Socialist Left and the Facist Right. The call for walls at the border and sending "illegals back home" is a very facist call in my book. The whole tone to it feels very earie, like its 1933 and jewish coachroaches" are no longer wanted in "their country".....except its 2008, and brown people from south of the boarder are today's coachroaches. The irony of all ironies is that it was, i believe, the winning hand of multiculturalism that makes the issue in the first place.
I agree with this guy, Thomas Paine's opinions on Multiculturalism and how we need to champion assimilation, not multiple cultures.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
I am very pleased with Jesse Ventura. It took balls, and boy he has them, to go into that arena and state his position on immigration. I dig that about the man and that says a whole hell of a lot about him. Further, I am sure Jesse is for some sort of background check "Blue Card" process at the border, for valid national security reasons, but other than that, we are all humans, we are all lovers of Liberty, (some more consistant than others), but we all seek freedom to better our lives and those that we love.
In Peace and Liberty,
Treg
This is a naive analysis...
You buy into the myth that illegal immigration and open borders are all about getting cheap labor to come to the US to pick lettuce... well let me give you a clue... it's about one thing and one thing only... the drug trade!
The lions share of funding for the neocons escapades has been derived from drugs. This goes back to Vietnam when Air America was running heroin... The Iran Contra period when they set up elaborate networks to move cocaine and now in Afghanistan where Blackwater is flying tons of heroin to feed the drug hungry market in the US.
Take a look at one of Jeb Bush's best buddies named Wally Hilliard... owner of numerous shady airlines based out of Florida. Good ole Uncle Wally's flight school was even used to train the "supposed" 911 terrorists. His airplanes have been caught moving large scale heroin shipments... one in Mena Arkansas and one crashed in the Yucatan with a large load.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/st...
The illegal immigrants are actually a cover for embedding well armed and organized gangs into every community in this country... and they have done that now. Go take a look at any crime report from any local community and tell me what you see... I'll guarantee that no matter where you are in this country you'll see a large percentage of crime is being committed by Illegals. And the sad part is that when they are caught... they're usually released as ICE has been given orders to leave them alone. Oh they do the occasional symbolic bust of a few here and there to prop up the illusion that they are exercising enforcement but that's just a charade.
And while all of this is going on we're subsidizing the illegals with our free medical care and welfare handouts. Damn... I think I'll renounce my citizenship and become an illegal... they have more freedom to do whatever they want than I do in America.
I'm a disabled Vietnam veteran and I have to drive 300+ miles to the closest VA hospital if I need medical treatment... but if I'm an illegal I just go to the local state-of-the-art medical facility here and receive the best treatment that money can buy... and my tax money is used to pay for it.
You also use the excuse that you had all of the turmoil of going through the legal immigration process... you should be even more angry at the illegals that are ignoring the legal process. Why should I follow the law and play by the rules if the US govt applies selective enforcement of the rules to an invasion force and penalizes those of us that have built this country.I don't owe a Mexican or anyone else anything... if they want to come to this country legally and contribute I'll be there to shake their hand when they cross the border... but if they want to come to commit crime and take what I've built... then I retain my 2nd Amendment right to protect what is mine.
My wife and I also had to go through the legal process to obtain her immigration visa from Romania. I had to fly back and forth 4 times to satisfy all of the documentary requirements that the US Embassy in Bucharest kept putting on us. I'm a successful business owner, land owner, no criminal record, honorably discharged Marine combat veteran and I was treated like a second class citizen... And now you're asking for sympathy for those that want to trash my country and it's laws.
Our southern border is so violent right now that many towns have been surrendered to the drug cartels. There is a very real war with very real dead people littering the streets... nearly as many people have died in just the past 2 years on the border as what we have lost in the entire Iraq/Afghan wars. This has nothing to do with pickin some friggen lettuce my friend1!!!
http://www.nationalterror...
Wake Up America... this is an invasion and nothing less.
If you or I as American citizens get caught in Mexico without papers it's an automatic felony and long jail terms there... anyone else find that ironic... you bleating heart kool-aid drinkers will just give this country away soon.... at least that way you won't have to worry about fighting to save it.
Thanks for your service to
Thanks for your service to our country. And thankyou for chiming in on this subject, from the veterans I've listened to, most of them are opposed to illegal immigration and want it stopped abnd don't like the plan Obama and McCain are pushing to deal with it. The American Legion weighed in on the issue as well recently, saying they opposed illegal immigration and amnesty and advocated an attrition through enforcement plan to solve the problem.
My thoughts: Building a
My thoughts:
Building a border fence and dumping more money in border enforcement only patches the problem. Spending millions of dollars to deport illegal immigrants or prosecute them would also be a waste of money and not fix the problem.
You can crack down on employers, but what does that solve? It punishes employers for trying to work efficiently. It's just more telling private parties how to run their business. More red tape, waste of everyone's time.
Instead, we need to focus on demolishing the welfare state that creates incentives for illegal immigration. When you subsidize something, you get more of it.
We need to also stop blaming everything on illegal immigrants. We need to take some PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY in realizing that our birthrate has dropped almost below replacement level, and there is a huge economic void due to the fact that our government spends more money than it has and subsidizes business. Well, guess what, that void has to be filled.
In other words, it is an economic issue, not a racial or cultural one.
And that's what Jesse, I think, was getting at.
Furthermore, "illegals" know how to build ladders.
I think what Dr Paul and you may be surprised to learn, is that what drives illegals to enter America is the prospect of jobs, not welfare. After all, if it was welfare driving them, they would all go to the top 5 welfare giving states, would they not? But a simple check of the data shows this is not the case.
But I highly agree, allowing noncitizens into our welfare State will just burden the socialist system to a breaking point...... OH WAIT ! WHat am I saying....???
Please, add all the illegals we can to break the back of the AMerican welfare State.
In Peace and Liberty,
Treg
Thank you for a sensible
Thank you for a sensible analysis! Great job.
They didn't want Ron Paul to
They didn't want Ron Paul to speak at the RNC because his message was not in lock-step with fascism.
I don't agree with jesse on this issue, but atleast he's talking about immigration, McFema won't bring it up at all.
Jesse is O.K., he's in the ballpark, but he's not in the game yet and that's O.K.
RonBarr...
You know what... nevermind. not worth my time.
Why are you putting words in my mouth?
How could I be in favor of inflation if I'm against the existence of legal tender laws and for the abolition of the Federal Reserve?
As far as freedom of speech, I don't think the government should stop anyone from saying anything they want.
Yes I support government intervention if it makes me more comfortable and prosperous, and support freedom when it makes me more comfortable and prosperous. That's rational. Why would anyone support a freedom that destroys them? Do you support allowing every individual to own weapon of mass destruction?
I support free market capitalism, freedom of speech, etc. etc, because it brings the most prosperous society, which is good for ME.
Please explain how government intervention can make you
more comfortable and prosperous?
If it destroys, it's not freedom (not in the libertarian sense of the word).
BTW, nearly every adult American DOES own a weapon of mass destruction. It's called a car.
I think even Bob Barr would be embarrassed to have you as a supporter.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
A couple examples:
Government intervention by keeping the borders regulated prevents a mass influx of milllions of poor people which would cause a lot of crime, because the economy would not be able to keep up with them.
Government intervention to keep individuals people from owning nukes and biological weapons that can cause mass deaths, is in the best interest of a peaceful and prosperous society.
Absolute freedom is not a good idea. There needs to be SOME limitations in order to have a peaceful and orderly society.
The government has failed on both accounts RonBarr -- next?
First of all, government sets the table for all those poor criminals you refer to and if you think they're are "keeping the borders regulated" you need to sober up.
Secondly, private individuals do own nukes and biological weapons. In fact I can buy biologicals over the internet and make something sinister out of them tomorrow. Also, heard of suitcase nukes? If you've got the cash, you can get one for yourself.
Your examples are weak and pathetic.
I am not an anarchist. I am a Constitutional Republican (which, in no way, is related to the Republican Party).
One day I may have to take up arms against people like you so you'd better choose your side correctly.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
I agree that government has failed
That's why I advocate stronger controls. The border should be more tightly regulated, for example. If you think I support the status quo, you couldn't be more wrong.
Why would you want to take arms up against me?
I advocate the same political policies as Dr. Paul.
You're very confused.
This is not one of Ron's policies.
RonBarr: "Yes I support government intervention if it makes me more comfortable and prosperous..."
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
That's not a political policy.
That's an ethical philosophy. Regardless of the ethical grounding, I support the same political policies as Dr. Paul. However he arrives at the political policies he advocates, they happen to be the same policies I arrive at through my ethics.
Our ethics are probably very similar, because like he I also will allow initiation of force by government in some cases, such as regulating the borders. Like him I think non-initiation-of-force is good rule for most cases, but not all.
Your allowance of government intervention to make YOU
more "comfortable and prosperous" may mean the theft and coercion of the rest of us.
I hope you are never that comfortable or that prosperous.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
No, because I'm talking about on a systemic
level. I support a SYSTEM that allows me the most comfort and prosperity. That system is laissez-faire capitalism. It's the opposite of theft and coercion. It's a system of voluntary trade.
But like I said, there are some exception where I think coercion is necessary, such as regulating the borders.
It's your government causing the problem.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
What on Earth are you talking about?
I don't support the status quo. I am for REDUCING the size and power of government over our lives and economy.
I agree that there is too much intervention. That's why I'm involved in the political process!
I"m already in the Campaign for Liberty. I signed up the first day.
You are as thick as a brick.
We wouldn't need "coercion" at the borders if your government would stop the entitlements, drug war and birthright citizenship!
Migration across the southern border would halt.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
In the long run, sure
but if you ended all that today, it would still not be a good idea to have unregulated borders tommorw. Poor people would start flowing in, millions of them, and the economy would not be able to grow fast enough to create jobs for them. This would result in massive crime, shanty towns, etc.
The border will still have to be regulated to allow the economy to keep pace. Assimilation of all the MILLIONS of people from below the border wanting to come here for a better life would take at least a hundred years.
You sound like you're a supporter of a North American Union.
Eric Dondero, is that you?
I just realized why this asshole sounds so familar --- it's because he talks and harps on the EXACT same things as our old pal and Ron Paul nemesis, Eric Dondero, the pseudo-libertarian whose perpetual refrain is "If I think it's good, it's libertarian!" Including the War on Drugs, massive foreign interventionism, etc. Not to mention being an apologist for the Federal Reserve and, implicitly, fractional reserve banking, which you all might like to know "FreeRonPaul" has spent hours defending here today.
Funny, you've been here for
Funny, you've been here for what... 39 weeks... yet you contribute nothing but trash talk. Must be hard to be you.
Actually,
akak has been very helpful to the revolution. As well as explaining sound monetary policy, he has an excellent ability to lay waste to trolls.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
John F Kennedy
We all have our roles -- that's the rumor around here anyway.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
I'll keep you guessing.
The more confused you are, the more entertaining you are.
Didn't my Destructo-Ray
Didn't my Destructo-Ray anti-troll disintegrator blast you yet? Damn, I have GOT to get that thing fixed! Cheap made-in-China WMD's!
How can we put words in your mouth
when it is already so full of shit?
More half-truths, more disinformation, more dissension, more twisting and perverting the true message of liberty --- you are quite a broken record.
I hope your overseers don't pay you by the intellectual points scored on your behalf, or you have a long, long way to go to earn that first CFR/PPT paycheck.
Kaka... oh, I get it now.
Kaka... oh, I get it now. Your name spelled backwards describes you perfectly.
Good
one.
Open the boarders and stop the freebies.
My father's ancestors came from Europe, without passports, and just walked right in after a quick health check. I'm sure many of your ancestors did as well.
Most of them "made it", some moved on.
The key here is:
No free education.
No free health care.
No free translation services.
No free employment agencies.
No birthright citizenship.
This alone would stop 80-90% of them coming in the first place AND you could scrap 90% of the Dept. of Immigration.
Staying and thriving would be the top-tier immigrants -- those with needed job skills, business skills, and/or wealthy and able to invest in the US. They would also probably be educated to at least a high school level and speak English. This would automatically make them far superior Americans than half the people in my home town.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
I don't know what to make of you...
I agree with just about everything you have to say with the one notable exception.
But I would correct you on this point... There is no *free* anything. We pay for it, for citizen and immigrant alike. "No such thing as a free lunch." And I am also for opening the borders and ending subsidies for everyone in these and other areas.
I know you know that, it would just serve us better if we stopped thinking of them as "free" services.
I know exactly who pays for the freebies.
I was speaking from the recipient's point of view -- the programs/services referred to are seen as "free".
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
I know you know...
I am just saying that words have power. Our choice of words sets up specific images and references in our heads and those who listen to us. It would probably serve us to try and eliminate the perpetuated falsehoods if/when possible... Wasn't critiquing, just commenting.
Example is that they changed "global warming" to "climate change". Our opponents understand the power of words. There was a documentary where some psychologists were able to predict every opinion based answer to every question asked because they set up word cues in the people's heads beforehand.
I wish I could find it, will try to dig it out.
You're preaching to the
You're preaching to the choir, wolfe. I know how these things work.
Lisa most of this list
Lisa most of this list should apply to Americans as well.
No free education.
No free health care.
No free translation services.
No free employment agencies.
Cutting out the "freebies" would cut the size of our illustrious government in half!
Yes, I agree and have made that point on another thread. Thx.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
Yep, His Thought Is Alarming
He doesn't have the full picture of "what's goin' on here".
He doesn't grasp "The New World Order Agenda", "The North American Union".
And, "illegal invaders" are told by their leaders, "that where Mexicans are, there is Mexico".
If Canadians were streaming in by the hundreds, thousands a day, we would have every right to be concerned that Our Sovereignty was under attack. It is an invasion!
http://www.americanpatrol...
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Update, yes there are more floatin' around, but for quick release, here is an example:
picture plus video link:
http://www.americanpatrol...
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Update 2:
THE GREAT NORTH AMERICAN PHONE-IN
By Tom DeWeese
September 4, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
"Those who are angry about the possible creation of a North American Union and are tired of being ignored by elected officials who deny the NAUs existence have an opportunity to deal with both."
http://www.newswithviews....
Good point, many RP
Good point, many RP supporters are aware of the push towards a north american union(but some still don't understand or forgot), and RP's strong opposition to a north american union, and I believe having illegals flood into the country from south of the border is part of that plan, because who out of the 3 countries will most benefit from an NAU? Canadian citizens are not too thrilled with it, most U.S. citizens oppose it, but Mexico would benefit the most from an NAU. So all this flood of illegal immigration from south of the border, plus chain migration from south of the border, is helping to bring about the day when the government can put an NAU to a vote and get it to pass. And if it passes, goodbye USA and our beloved Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Btw, I disagree with ventura and his pro-illegal immigration stance and would never vote for him for that reason alone. Ron Paul is much better on the illegal immigration issue and part of the reason I got fully beind him.