courageous... If he had any courage he would dig into the questions surrounding 9/11... but of course he wouldn't be on any longer... would that give anybody any ideas of who might be behind 9/11?
Why would the big media business be so afraid of the truth?
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom" and "Revolutionary Business"
visit www.mikeandjake.com
Every time I see this guy (the great Ron Paul of course) no matter where he is or who is speaking to, I am just blown away by how he is able to speak with such great conviction yet with such grace. Always. I love this guy.
supposedly accosted beck about 9/11 in a dressing room.
so how did he do that glen?.....by asking you if you understand the laws of gravity here on earth? by asking you if you knew that no planes were EVER found? by asking you if you bought THEIR shit hook line and sinker?
fucking please.
people.....wake up!!!!!!!!! how can you all understand that the FED is corrupt and then not even come close to SEEING 9/11 for what it was?
"by asking you if you knew that no planes were EVER found?"
Disinfo garbage. Maybe at the Pentagon, but if you're saying "No planes hit the WTC" then you're probably also typing behind a keyboard somewhere at Raytheon trying to discredit the genuine 9/11 Truth Movement.
I believe I've watched all the Beck interviews of Ron Paul and Beck has changed a lot since the first encounters. It's been gradual - but his admiration towards Paul was nearly immediate.
Beck backs Paul on monetary and fiscal issues, but not at all on foreign relations (including the 'war on terror' bit). But by adding "rapid" to his being against "troop withdrawal" he has certainly climbed down one important notch.
One of the R4R videos was one about creating our own media centers. So in addition to the wonderful and free internet, we can offer an option to neo-con and democratice biased programming.
Is there some centralized effort on this?
BTW: There probably are good opportunities to create liberty shows for the existing MSM. All Neo-con shows use real conservative ideas to attract and keep their audience (then they say you have to vote from someone that isn't conservative). So there has to be an audience for a conservative program that pushes real conservative candidates in the existing media.
Why does he always bring up 9-11 truth when Paul comes on. It's like he intentionally wants to expose the public to the fact that 9-11 truthers are associated with Paul. Doesn't this irritate anyone else?
He's doing it to allow Paul to clear his name. It was reported in the media that some people yelled out "inside job" when Ventura was speaking. Paul needs a chance to say he's not associated with that view.
But the two questions that were brought up By Jessie were legitimate questions. Let alone the fact that you are a moron for being under the guise of someone who doesn't support truth regardless of whether it is about 9/11 or not.
Anti-Truther = Idiot.
Always question.
Nice Handle our newest Barr Spammer. You've been here two Days have you. How much is the Barr Campaign paying you?
I don't have that much sampling of Glenn Beck, only the encounters with Ron Paul. My impression is that Glenn is a skeptic that understood that something was wrong in Washington but needed the time to let Ron's arguments sink in. This interview was pretty positive, not just in terms of text but also the non-verbal part. Ron got all the chance to give a good twist on J.V.'s truther position for example. If all of yesteryear's interviews would have been like this one, we would have president Paul 2008.
I know Beck has Dr. Paul on every once in a while, but how can the guy cover R4TR and have a problem with what Ventura said... Ventura said he had questions, and he's right to ask them.
Now Beck is only opposed to the speed Dr. Paul recommends changing foreign policy. Maybe by the election or the next congressional election he will see things our way. What a difference a year makes.
I commend Glenn for having RP on but I still don't consider him
courageous... If he had any courage he would dig into the questions surrounding 9/11... but of course he wouldn't be on any longer... would that give anybody any ideas of who might be behind 9/11?
Why would the big media business be so afraid of the truth?
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom" and "Revolutionary Business"
visit www.mikeandjake.com
If he did that "he would dig into the questions surrounding ...
9/11" with Ron Paul ...
Would you like the answers Dr. Paul would give?
WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
I think RP's response to 9/11 and Jessie ...
is very telling.
He does not discount the need for transparency, but completely dismisses the "inside job" theory as not probable.
He seemed just as sincere about this topic as all the other topics.
All you "inside jobbers" are free to post what you want, just be clear about what is speculation and what is fact.
The truth is we do not know the truth.
WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
Every Time
Every time I see this guy (the great Ron Paul of course) no matter where he is or who is speaking to, I am just blown away by how he is able to speak with such great conviction yet with such grace. Always. I love this guy.
love how jesse
supposedly accosted beck about 9/11 in a dressing room.
so how did he do that glen?.....by asking you if you understand the laws of gravity here on earth? by asking you if you knew that no planes were EVER found? by asking you if you bought THEIR shit hook line and sinker?
fucking please.
people.....wake up!!!!!!!!! how can you all understand that the FED is corrupt and then not even come close to SEEING 9/11 for what it was?
i was born on the wrong planet.
"by asking you if you knew
"by asking you if you knew that no planes were EVER found?"
Disinfo garbage. Maybe at the Pentagon, but if you're saying "No planes hit the WTC" then you're probably also typing behind a keyboard somewhere at Raytheon trying to discredit the genuine 9/11 Truth Movement.
Beck has changed
I believe I've watched all the Beck interviews of Ron Paul and Beck has changed a lot since the first encounters. It's been gradual - but his admiration towards Paul was nearly immediate.
Beck backs Paul on monetary and fiscal issues, but not at all on foreign relations (including the 'war on terror' bit). But by adding "rapid" to his being against "troop withdrawal" he has certainly climbed down one important notch.
I agree. Beck's "near death
I agree. Beck's "near death health scare" (or whatever it was) seems to have tempered him a bit.
Any and all TV exposurse
Any and all TV exposurse should be welcomed. Name association is the central theme in campaigning.
Our good Doctor Paul is a very wise and personable man who can turn most interviews around to his credit.
What is the status of getting our own media up and running?
One of the R4R videos was one about creating our own media centers. So in addition to the wonderful and free internet, we can offer an option to neo-con and democratice biased programming.
Is there some centralized effort on this?
BTW: There probably are good opportunities to create liberty shows for the existing MSM. All Neo-con shows use real conservative ideas to attract and keep their audience (then they say you have to vote from someone that isn't conservative). So there has to be an audience for a conservative program that pushes real conservative candidates in the existing media.
Break the Matrix has been
Break the Matrix has been doing this. Check out their page.
Is this "liberty media network"
going to be for all liberty minded people? How open minded will it be?
We should send him nice emails
Reward them when they're good, punish them when they're bad.
----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul
He brings it up
Because it's entertaining and he hopes it will help his ratings (I'm responding to zrih1 below).
Glenn Beck seems to be sincere about Paul, BUT
Why does he always bring up 9-11 truth when Paul comes on. It's like he intentionally wants to expose the public to the fact that 9-11 truthers are associated with Paul. Doesn't this irritate anyone else?
As an anti-Truther I appreciate him bringing it up.
He's doing it to allow Paul to clear his name. It was reported in the media that some people yelled out "inside job" when Ventura was speaking. Paul needs a chance to say he's not associated with that view.
I'm sorry
But the two questions that were brought up By Jessie were legitimate questions. Let alone the fact that you are a moron for being under the guise of someone who doesn't support truth regardless of whether it is about 9/11 or not.
Anti-Truther = Idiot.
Always question.
Nice Handle our newest Barr Spammer. You've been here two Days have you. How much is the Barr Campaign paying you?
Oruval, I think that RonBarb
Oruval, I think that RonBarb is just another alias for El-Booger, who is just another alias for the infamous OneVoiceofTreason.
If we keep threatening to kill him, maybe he will go away?
Freedom of Speech honored
ergo Mr. Ventura-
Thank you Dr. Paul!
Improving!
I don't have that much sampling of Glenn Beck, only the encounters with Ron Paul. My impression is that Glenn is a skeptic that understood that something was wrong in Washington but needed the time to let Ron's arguments sink in. This interview was pretty positive, not just in terms of text but also the non-verbal part. Ron got all the chance to give a good twist on J.V.'s truther position for example. If all of yesteryear's interviews would have been like this one, we would have president Paul 2008.
I know Beck has Dr. Paul on
I know Beck has Dr. Paul on every once in a while, but how can the guy cover R4TR and have a problem with what Ventura said... Ventura said he had questions, and he's right to ask them.
--------------------------
"I killed the banks"
fight
fight for Liberty must continue
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
http://www.dvds4delegates...
http://www.flickr.com/pho...
Beck Wishes We Were Like The Swiss
Now Beck is only opposed to the speed Dr. Paul recommends changing foreign policy. Maybe by the election or the next congressional election he will see things our way. What a difference a year makes.