I have decided that from here on, I will ONLY support candidates that are 100% behind the 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT.
NOBODY ELSE!
Now we have the stinking truth suppressors crawling like roaches all over this website.
I'm sick of it.
Anybody with a "fire in their belly" needs to go to Chuck Baldwin's campaign.
Truthers are welcome there.
Nobody else has the stomach for it.
And for 2012, Chuck or Jesse Ventura are now on my list of possibilities.
I'm thru with lily-livered little swine who want to wave signs and think it's some kind of bar-b-que, or having tea with the ladies..
Why, if you have so little respect for Dr Paul's character, do you spend any time at all on a site devoted to getting him elected?
For all our talk of supporting Dr Paul and being strict Constitutionalists, why don’t we read the Constitution and realize that Dr Paul can be elected President without appearing on a single State ballot?
supports a new impartial 9/11 investigation.
He obviously doesn't believe what we've been told by the gov't. And neither would any other person with half a brain in his head.
My "lily livered" comment was directed at those who might be running in 2012, which it is fairly certain that RP will not be.
Shaithan indeed, or Cthulhu or Ol' Scratch or Beelzebubba...
Why vote for the lesser of evils?
For all our talk of supporting Dr Paul and being strict Constitutionalists, why don’t we read the Constitution and realize that Dr Paul can be elected President without appearing on a single State ballot?
For all our talk of supporting Dr Paul and being strict Constitutionalists, why don’t we read the Constitution and realize that Dr Paul can be elected President without appearing on a single State ballot?
What we have to know now that evangelical vote sways the party as saw by palins nomination and huckabees dog fight that he would have won if it were not for so many other guys splitting the vote. Even bush would have lost with so many players in the game in 2000.
So the candidate needs to be legendary to republican evangelical voters.
He or she must also be anti NWO...
After that it wont matter. Because we can promise a populist style of message to the public with the teeth to fight the nazi like neo cons with the evangelicals on our side rather than against us.
This type of person also brings in the ability to bring ron in for economic or treasurer to undo the NWO neo cons mess.
Only a couple names seem viable in america to do this:
1) Roy Moore of Alabama
2) Mel Gibson of California
In fact this team would be ideal to run...money, movement matching our movement goals and rons message with the evangelicals.
Palin although interesting but seems very, very lost on the use of our military abroad, unless someone can show otherwise.
But one can expect she will be there running, huckabee may or may not run since she is running, romney will be there, after that who knows...
In terms of Jesse he does capture the progressive and moderates in the party and independent. But i am sure this will not be enough. Probably giving him 600 thousand rather than 1.2 million votes that paul got.
Looking at huckabee and buchanan history >5 million primary votes are possible with the teaming up with the evangelicals.
Now if Jesse were to run as a blue dog democrat...then that would be very, very interesting for the movement to not just go in to the republicans but also to go into the democrats, who seem to be gaining power.
Now that would be interesting. Having a two winged attack to see what happens when you put a candidate through on either side.
while Jesse gives a good talk he doesn't walk the walk. If he were leadership material he wouldn't be leaving the country. He would have tried to run for office and continue the revolution like his book title. He wants us to all work hard and IF he thinks we have awaken enough people he will then lead our charge. Excuse me, but the people who continue working building and learning are the ones I will be endorsing and giving my hard earned money.
Peace
bought the book. I don't think my comments are misplaced and uninformed it is not likely we have 4 years. If he would have run for senate and won he would have been in Congress with Dr. Paul on top of the issues and getting exposure. If we survive and he comes back in 4 years people will have moved on to others who stayed and continued to fight. I would rather vote for Alex Jones than Ventura. Just my 2 cents.
We've got about 3 years. Who will it be? I don't believe that the Doc will run again and I think it's his last term in Congress. He'll focus on the CFL.
Ventura needs to clean himself up before I'd support him - he looked like a bum at the CFL. He'll never win presenting himself like that.
I feel great about all that we and the Doc have accomplished! One step at a time...
Jesse Ventura has the name recognition we can build on.
Mittens and Huckleberry will be offered up by republican faithful
But if we do our work promoting Ventura & Johnson over the next 4 years, "Ventura/Johnson 2012" will have such a massive amount of name recognition that polling will put them ahead as the "front runners" from the start. The rest will be forced to play catch up.
Further, it we really work the 3 states of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, then we could really make history.
I like Ventura. His machismo totally bolls over people like Hannity, O'Rielly, Limbaugh, Beck and the rest of the Right wing talk machine.
Ron Paul's lack of machismo was seen as a "weakness" and thus they felt his policies were "weak". But they can say and feel that about Ventura. Ventura will not let them "FRAME" his policies as "weak". He turns it around and says, "My policies are the tough policies".
I'd like to see him/her more informed on the enviroment & realize that hand's off business is good, but all monster corporations needs to be watched with an honest eye.
if Ron Paul doesn't run again. What would stop him? Age won't be a big deal... he'll do it again to re-energize us and to get into the national debates. It won't be about winning (although it would be a nice result), it will be about getting the message out and growing the revolution. Am I wrong?
I don't think he will. Age, I think, is a big deal. Being president takes a lot of energy--let alone campaigning. He's going to be 76. That's expecting a little much I think. Besides, it's not about him, remember?
How the heck should I know? We don't even know who's running yet!
well... except for Hillary Clinton, assuming Obama doesn't win.... but of course, I would never vote for her.
I sincerely hope Ron Paul considers running again..... I know he'd be older, but he's my hero..... not only do I support him and agree with him on all the issues, it's because of him that I now hold these beliefs. And, because of his devotion, record, consistence, etc. I really can think of no one else who deserves such an honor.
I think Jesse Ventura is a strong voice for the freedom message.... but even though he's very strong/exciting/enthusiastic... he seems.... strange? paranoid? I don't know what it is about him.... maybe it's that he's not humble enough? I don't know.... all those things are irrelevant anyways....
What I know is whoever runs, I have to be just as enthusiastic about them as I was with Ron Paul or more so.... It's just like now.... sure there's Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin... but they don't really do it for me.
I will be interested to see what becomes of our Ron Paul candidates in 4 years.
The problem is, I don't really know of anyone who holds our philosophy who's in government now/would have been in it long enough to even be able to run in 2012. We'll have to wait and see.... you never know what bright new star might pop up in 4 years....
he keeps reiterating how reluctant he was to run even this time, I am thinking he won't be running again. I'd support Johnson, Goldwater, Jr., Ventura, Rand Paul, Barr (if he truly has changed), Baldwin....to name a few...
If he were to run. I think we will have a lot of freedom candidates running in 2012 if we last that long. We need to work on getting them easier ballot access and a level playing field. Oh.. and don't forget getting rid of those damn voting machines.
John Adams-
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --October 11, 1798
Patrick Henry-
“It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.” [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]
John Jay-
“ Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.” Source: October 12, 1816. The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, Henry P. Johnston, ed., (New York: Burt Franklin, 1970), Vol. IV, p. 393.
“Whether our religion permits Christians to vote for infidel rulers is a question which merits more consideration than it seems yet to have generally received either from the clergy or the laity. It appears to me that what the prophet said to Jehoshaphat about his attachment to Ahab ["Shouldest thou help the ungodly and love them that hate the Lord?" 2 Chronicles 19:2] affords a salutary lesson.” [The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, 1794-1826, Henry P. Johnston, editor (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1893), Vol. IV, p.365]
Noah Webster-
"Let it be impressed on your mind that God commands you to choose for rulers just men who will rule in the fear of God [Exodus 18:21]. . . . If the citizens neglect their duty and place unprincipled men in office, the government will soon be corrupted . . . If our government fails to secure public prosperity and happiness, it must be because the citizens neglect the Divine commands, and elect bad men to make and administer the laws." [Noah Webster, The History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie and Peck, 1832), pp. 336-337, 49]
Actually, I'm also gonna go
Actually, I'm also gonna go with Satan. We could do worse.... We are ABOUT to do worse.
I don't think he's been doing much of a job though
.....
I hope there IS an election
I hope there IS an election
Ventura/Johnson2012 At least
Ventura/Johnson2012
At least that was the vibe I was getting at the the Rally. In the mean time I already got my votersforventura sticker.
"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever." - Thomas Jefferson
Whoever the media decides for me
By 2012, we'll just have the FOX party and the MSNBC party. The 1 on my remote doesn't work, so I guess I'm voting MSNBC.
Paul, Ventura, Johnson, Baldwin, Kokesh,
or any other candidate that unites the liberty movement. Hopefully it will be some sort of coalition of the above
things better change by 2012, otherwise we gonna go to war
no 2012 elections most likely
Actually, I think I have to agree. We are so screwed.
But on the bright side... uh , well when I see it ...
Adam Kokesh
This kid is awesome. Go ahead and bash away but I think he's wonderful. The kid has balls.
Ron Paul
Ron Paul
Gary Johnson
Gary Johnson/Barry Goldwater Jr. Ticket
Jesse Ventura
or Rand Paul
or Ron Paul
but ofc, who knows who will be running..
Rand Paul for KY Governor 2011
How about Rand Paul for Kentucky Governor in 2011. The Republican Party primary is going to be wide open.
Jesse Ventura for Pres.
Peter Schiff Sec. of Treasury.
Lets pick a third party
candidate, and unite behind that person, let give the dems and repubs a butt kicking
Ill be voting for cyndezu
i just digg her : )
Live Free or Diebold
She'll take a lot of flak for all those nekked pictures of her
on the "Girls of Digg" website.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
haha! Oh my : )...seriously tho- if all goes well?
Kevin Rudd
Live Free or Diebold
As of right now, this moment,
I have decided that from here on, I will ONLY support candidates that are 100% behind the 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT.
NOBODY ELSE!
Now we have the stinking truth suppressors crawling like roaches all over this website.
I'm sick of it.
Anybody with a "fire in their belly" needs to go to Chuck Baldwin's campaign.
Truthers are welcome there.
Nobody else has the stomach for it.
And for 2012, Chuck or Jesse Ventura are now on my list of possibilities.
I'm thru with lily-livered little swine who want to wave signs and think it's some kind of bar-b-que, or having tea with the ladies..
"Lily Livered?"
Why, if you have so little respect for Dr Paul's character, do you spend any time at all on a site devoted to getting him elected?
For all our talk of supporting Dr Paul and being strict Constitutionalists, why don’t we read the Constitution and realize that Dr Paul can be elected President without appearing on a single State ballot?
Dr. Paul
supports a new impartial 9/11 investigation.
He obviously doesn't believe what we've been told by the gov't. And neither would any other person with half a brain in his head.
My "lily livered" comment was directed at those who might be running in 2012, which it is fairly certain that RP will not be.
By then, whoever the chip in my head
tells me to vote for. duh.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
John F Kennedy
A realist.
Thanks for the laugh!
I'll Be Following The GOPs
Party line and voting for Satan 2012
Delegates Revolt For Freedom !!!
Satan in 2012!
Chi Chi, bring me my diebold machine!
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
John F Kennedy
Best in Class
Shaithan indeed, or Cthulhu or Ol' Scratch or Beelzebubba...
Why vote for the lesser of evils?
For all our talk of supporting Dr Paul and being strict Constitutionalists, why don’t we read the Constitution and realize that Dr Paul can be elected President without appearing on a single State ballot?
Re-election
of Ron Paul.
For all our talk of supporting Dr Paul and being strict Constitutionalists, why don’t we read the Constitution and realize that Dr Paul can be elected President without appearing on a single State ballot?
not persons on the D or R paties
voting 3rd party, unless C4L has a candidate in the D or R.
need an savy evangelical with a big name that is anti nwo
What we have to know now that evangelical vote sways the party as saw by palins nomination and huckabees dog fight that he would have won if it were not for so many other guys splitting the vote. Even bush would have lost with so many players in the game in 2000.
So the candidate needs to be legendary to republican evangelical voters.
He or she must also be anti NWO...
After that it wont matter. Because we can promise a populist style of message to the public with the teeth to fight the nazi like neo cons with the evangelicals on our side rather than against us.
This type of person also brings in the ability to bring ron in for economic or treasurer to undo the NWO neo cons mess.
Only a couple names seem viable in america to do this:
1) Roy Moore of Alabama
2) Mel Gibson of California
In fact this team would be ideal to run...money, movement matching our movement goals and rons message with the evangelicals.
Palin although interesting but seems very, very lost on the use of our military abroad, unless someone can show otherwise.
But one can expect she will be there running, huckabee may or may not run since she is running, romney will be there, after that who knows...
In terms of Jesse he does capture the progressive and moderates in the party and independent. But i am sure this will not be enough. Probably giving him 600 thousand rather than 1.2 million votes that paul got.
Looking at huckabee and buchanan history >5 million primary votes are possible with the teaming up with the evangelicals.
Now if Jesse were to run as a blue dog democrat...then that would be very, very interesting for the movement to not just go in to the republicans but also to go into the democrats, who seem to be gaining power.
Now that would be interesting. Having a two winged attack to see what happens when you put a candidate through on either side.
Don't know but
while Jesse gives a good talk he doesn't walk the walk. If he were leadership material he wouldn't be leaving the country. He would have tried to run for office and continue the revolution like his book title. He wants us to all work hard and IF he thinks we have awaken enough people he will then lead our charge. Excuse me, but the people who continue working building and learning are the ones I will be endorsing and giving my hard earned money.
Peace
Read his book
and you see why he left.
Your comments are misplaced and uninformed.
Rand Paul/Jesse Ventura '12
I did read and
bought the book. I don't think my comments are misplaced and uninformed it is not likely we have 4 years. If he would have run for senate and won he would have been in Congress with Dr. Paul on top of the issues and getting exposure. If we survive and he comes back in 4 years people will have moved on to others who stayed and continued to fight. I would rather vote for Alex Jones than Ventura. Just my 2 cents.
As always, we'll have to see
We've got about 3 years. Who will it be? I don't believe that the Doc will run again and I think it's his last term in Congress. He'll focus on the CFL.
Ventura needs to clean himself up before I'd support him - he looked like a bum at the CFL. He'll never win presenting himself like that.
I feel great about all that we and the Doc have accomplished! One step at a time...
Ventura/Johnson 2012
Jesse Ventura has the name recognition we can build on.
Mittens and Huckleberry will be offered up by republican faithful
But if we do our work promoting Ventura & Johnson over the next 4 years, "Ventura/Johnson 2012" will have such a massive amount of name recognition that polling will put them ahead as the "front runners" from the start. The rest will be forced to play catch up.
Further, it we really work the 3 states of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, then we could really make history.
I like Ventura. His machismo totally bolls over people like Hannity, O'Rielly, Limbaugh, Beck and the rest of the Right wing talk machine.
Ron Paul's lack of machismo was seen as a "weakness" and thus they felt his policies were "weak". But they can say and feel that about Ventura. Ventura will not let them "FRAME" his policies as "weak". He turns it around and says, "My policies are the tough policies".
Lets get to work people.
In Peace & Liberty,
Treg
Or....
Vice Versa. Johnson/Ventura 2012. Maybe a better ticket.
I hope another Ron Paulish
candidate rises by then.
I'd like to see him/her more informed on the enviroment & realize that hand's off business is good, but all monster corporations needs to be watched with an honest eye.
Ron Paul... and whoever he
Ron Paul...
and whoever he decides to pick as a running mate...
I'll be incredibly surprised....
if Ron Paul doesn't run again. What would stop him? Age won't be a big deal... he'll do it again to re-energize us and to get into the national debates. It won't be about winning (although it would be a nice result), it will be about getting the message out and growing the revolution. Am I wrong?
Hmm
I don't think he will. Age, I think, is a big deal. Being president takes a lot of energy--let alone campaigning. He's going to be 76. That's expecting a little much I think. Besides, it's not about him, remember?
I'll vote for Jesse in honor of chris x.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
by the way...
did you watch as Ron Paul, on Glen Beck, disassociated himself from Jesse's 'truth movement' statements? here's the link if you missed it....
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
of course you will...
thanks Lisa....ranks right up there with the congressional medal of honor...
I support Homer Simpson
At least the joke will be an honest one.
How the heck should I know?
How the heck should I know? We don't even know who's running yet!
well... except for Hillary Clinton, assuming Obama doesn't win.... but of course, I would never vote for her.
I sincerely hope Ron Paul considers running again..... I know he'd be older, but he's my hero..... not only do I support him and agree with him on all the issues, it's because of him that I now hold these beliefs. And, because of his devotion, record, consistence, etc. I really can think of no one else who deserves such an honor.
I think Jesse Ventura is a strong voice for the freedom message.... but even though he's very strong/exciting/enthusiastic... he seems.... strange? paranoid? I don't know what it is about him.... maybe it's that he's not humble enough? I don't know.... all those things are irrelevant anyways....
What I know is whoever runs, I have to be just as enthusiastic about them as I was with Ron Paul or more so.... It's just like now.... sure there's Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin... but they don't really do it for me.
I will be interested to see what becomes of our Ron Paul candidates in 4 years.
The problem is, I don't really know of anyone who holds our philosophy who's in government now/would have been in it long enough to even be able to run in 2012. We'll have to wait and see.... you never know what bright new star might pop up in 4 years....
Long Live Ron Paul!
Well, I'd like it to be Ron Paul but since
he keeps reiterating how reluctant he was to run even this time, I am thinking he won't be running again. I'd support Johnson, Goldwater, Jr., Ventura, Rand Paul, Barr (if he truly has changed), Baldwin....to name a few...
....
Governor Gary Johnson.
I would vote for Jesse
If he were to run. I think we will have a lot of freedom candidates running in 2012 if we last that long. We need to work on getting them easier ballot access and a level playing field. Oh.. and don't forget getting rid of those damn voting machines.
NOT Jesse Ventura!
enough said...
It's not Christian like
to hold a grudge Chris. You of all people should know that.
it's not about holding a grudge, Mike, we've had this discussion
http://www.eadshome.com/Q...
John Adams-
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --October 11, 1798
Patrick Henry-
“It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.” [May 1765 Speech to the House of Burgesses]
John Jay-
“ Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.” Source: October 12, 1816. The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, Henry P. Johnston, ed., (New York: Burt Franklin, 1970), Vol. IV, p. 393.
“Whether our religion permits Christians to vote for infidel rulers is a question which merits more consideration than it seems yet to have generally received either from the clergy or the laity. It appears to me that what the prophet said to Jehoshaphat about his attachment to Ahab ["Shouldest thou help the ungodly and love them that hate the Lord?" 2 Chronicles 19:2] affords a salutary lesson.” [The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, 1794-1826, Henry P. Johnston, editor (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1893), Vol. IV, p.365]
Noah Webster-
"Let it be impressed on your mind that God commands you to choose for rulers just men who will rule in the fear of God [Exodus 18:21]. . . . If the citizens neglect their duty and place unprincipled men in office, the government will soon be corrupted . . . If our government fails to secure public prosperity and happiness, it must be because the citizens neglect the Divine commands, and elect bad men to make and administer the laws." [Noah Webster, The History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie and Peck, 1832), pp. 336-337, 49]