Any explanation why the MA & NV RP Delegates voted for McCain?
A blog entry on www.lewrockwell.com claims that the (4) RP delegates from Nevada voted for McCain. And, that one of them raised money from the local RP organization to get to the convention to cast her vote for the death eater.
I don't get it. Does anybody know why they would have voted that way?
here is the link:
output




















I'm Wondering
Were you guys who caved:
A. Pressured into caving and succumbed?
B. Duped into caving with GOP false promises?
C. McCain/neocon moles all along?
.
Drama queen.
If everything I did, in your eyes, is negated becaue I said go die, then you can go die yourself.
I was there.
I was there. And it wasn't pretty - in fact, it was worse than it's been described in most places.
RedHats following us around. BlackHats demanding to search our bags and confiscating whatever they felt like. Everyone around us laughing and jeering at us. Ugly faces shoving themselves in our faces.
No, it wasn't pretty. But we knew it wouldn't be before we ever went in there. We ourselves described it in advance as "Christians in the Roman coliseum" and "Davey Crocket at the Alamo". We were going in to LOSE - but we were going to do it standing on PRINCIPLE in order to trailblaze for freedom-lovers who would come after us, and who could look to our example for inspiration and guidance as they fought the good fight.
I was only an alternate, but I did everything I could to make sure our delegates could stand by their principles to the fullest extent possible under the rules and state laws. For two days we tried to get Dr. Paul a speaking slot, under a "Fairness Campaign." Then we pushed for delegates to "Abstain from McCain" if they weren't able to change their pledged votes. And on the final night, we tried to get an actual roll call vote for VP instead of an acclamation, so that all of the RP supporters could at least cast their votes for him (there are NO bound votes for VP).
Even when I was given a delegate pass for 30 minutes to have the "experience" of being on the floor, I used my time to take petitions to small delegations like Guam and the Marianas Islands, to try to get that 5-delegation majority support and get RP's name in the nomination.
Like so many of the RP supporters that went to the RNC, I busted my butt to fulfill my duties and obligations to those who had busted their own butts to get me there, and who wanted to see SOMETHING registered for Dr. Paul there.
And then, we were betrayed.
I don't use that word lightly. I sent text messages and emails, talked to delegates individually, did everything I could to make sure our people didn't listen to the likes of Drew Ivers... and then heard about delegate after delegate voting for McCain, when they didn't have to.
I'm disgusted. Yes, we are all individuals, and as individuals have to make our own decisions. But then we have to face the consequences of those decisions. Those delegates who sold out can be commended for their courageous fight against the enemy in order to get there, just like Benedict Arnold. But like Benedict Arnold, they will be forever stained with their final actions, where they betrayed the trust of those who had sent them there to do a job.
Shame on them. I have burned so many political bridges in order to go up there and stand on principle - how dare they turn that into dung. And that's what they have done.
I've read all of the reasons, and all of the excuses. None of them rise to the level of acceptable. I was there. I know.
Now, let's get on with the Revolution, and take back our party. We will be doing so in my state. What about in your state?
OUR SECRET STRATEGY
OF DOING EVERYTHING THEY WANT IS WORKING!!!!
Get your kids in the military over in Iraq and Afghanistan -- let's get more senators that do everything McCain wants too!
If they come to your house for your guns, just hand them over -- it's all part of the strategy folks!
WE ARE WINNING -- VIVA THE REVOLUTION!!!!
Love It!
I wish I had written that one.
You Showed Them
How does voting for John McCain show them you can't be taken for granted? They got your vote - that's what they wanted! The GOP machine is snickering at your "strategy". They rolled you.
Re-think this when you are
Re-think this when you are ready to think with your head rather than your emotions. This movement will take years. If you are willing to throw everything away for one night just to "show" them that we don't wanna work with them, then good luck with your plan and I'll see you in a few years. We'll see where you are then.
Work With Them?
Actually, we don't want to work with them. They are AGAINST us. Did you see how they treated Ron Paul throughout the campaign? WORSE than the proverbial red-headed step-child.
Their idea of us working WITH them is for us to capitulate and support their NWO neocon. You fell right into their hands. Giving into them accomplishes NOTHING.
We've been working with them all these years. How far has it gotten us?
We're going to take over the GOP by supporting their same ol, same ol international neocons? No, that's how they are getting you to assimilate into them. You're not changing them, they're changing you. You're not getting them to board our ship, you've boarded theirs.
You got owned and you will always be owned if you cave.
Now if they had a reasonably constitutional candidate, your strategy might have some merit, but McCain is part of the problem. Supporting him is no solution. Not in the short term, not in the long run.
You are not going to get them to work with you by supporting McSame, you are getting them to LAUGH at you because you've already capitulated to them. They don't even have to try to appease you, you already bent to their desires.
You think in the future they will work with you because you gave into them now? Are you that naive? We've been giving into them over and over and all it does its tell them that we're willing to support globalist neocons - so they keep offering us more of them. They will offer us more neos in the future because you told them you would support them.
Reality Check
You said: " Actually, we don't want to work with them. They are AGAINST us. Did you see how they treated Ron Paul throughout the campaign? "
Hello? Ron Paul himself is working with the Republican Party and seeks to change it from WITHIN the party! He wanted delegates in Minnesota, not to make a big scene or to throw him a few votes, but to INFILTRATE the party!
Get Real!
He is not trying to change it by going along with them, he is trying to change it by standing AGAINST them when they are wrong. He is showing them what a conservative Republican is supposed to stand for and REFUSING to support neocons like McCain.
Ron Paul has steadfastly refused to endorse John McCain to this very moment. So why would you VOTE for McCain? Are you saying Ron Paul is going about it wrong by standing on principle?
Yes, he wanted delegates to infiltrate the GOP - not to vote for McCain and give the neocons even more support.
Oh yes, when the time is right you and 999 others will suddenly show your true colors and support a Paulite candidate some year in the future (if America still exists). We know we can trust you to stand firm on your convictions because you are doing such a good job of it now.
Even if you succeed in your devious strategy, people will not accept a candidate foisted on them under false pretenses. You will experience blowback like never before. You will appear to be the deceiving snakey politicians that the public will go against.
Reality Check
You said: " Actually, we don't want to work with them. They are AGAINST us. Did you see how they treated Ron Paul throughout the campaign? "
Hello? Ron Paul himself is working with the Republican Party and seeks to change it from WITHIN the party! He wanted delegates in Minnesota, not to make a big scene or to throw him a few votes, but to INFILTRATE the party!
Reality Check
You said: " Actually, we don't want to work with them. They are AGAINST us. Did you see how they treated Ron Paul throughout the campaign? "
Hello? Ron Paul himself is working with the Republican Party and seeks to change it from WITHIN the party! He wanted delegates in Minnesota, not to make a big scene or to throw him a few votes, but to INFILTRATE the party!
Not sure why there are 3 of these comments (above)...
but there's no way to delete..
There are 3 because you hit
There are 3 because you hit post comment 3 times..there is an easy one..lol..push once and go on..DP is slow.
I, too, have given up on the GOP. I heard someone on TV last night say that there is only 2 things you can do with corruption..give in, or give up. It bothered me, but I do not think it is true. I choose not to work with a corrupt organization that truly cares NOTHING for the people who voted for RP, and whose members I seem to have little in common with, at day's end. I will, however, continue to work against corruption. This thing is SO huge, tho. I found out today that EVERY single bank in the US is regulated by the FEDS and all checks are cleared by the Federal Reserve. ALL electronic transfers go through the Federal Reserve. My bank is NOT a national bank, yet at its core, it is. There is so much complexity it boggles my mind, sometimes..
To Those Pointing the Finger
Those who disagree with what the delegates did, PLEASE tell me how abstaining would have helped the movement. Until you can answer this, stop pointing the finger.
I gave you my opinion about how what we did helps the movement. Now you tell me how what you would have done would have helped the movement.
Blind
It would have shown that we don't bend over to cowtow to their vision of how America should be. JUST LIKE DR. NO VOTING NO TO EVERYTHING THAT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
But you tell yourself whatever you need to to sleep at night.
It's scary that so many
It's scary that so many people still don't understand what we are doing. It's scary because this movement will go nowhere with this ignorance. This movement isn't about standing around protesting and saying no to McCain!!!! It's about action!!! It's about getting involved!!
.
It's about screwing us over so you can gain a smidgen of popularity with the neocons.
We've had posts up for days explaining this from people
who were there first hand. How did you miss them?
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
Sick of this
I'm sick of you people judging. This is a long term mission. It's called strategy!!! Abstaining would have achieved nothing and would have made it harder for us to get involved in the party. It was a strategic move.
And for those of you who keep saying that we were elected to vote for Ron Paul or abstain, you are wrong. As a delegate, I was NOT elected by Ron Paul people, so if I use your logic, I HAD to vote McCain. But this is not the reason I did it. It's called strategy. Stop passing judgment and DO something for the movement. That's what we are doing. We have a plan for the future and it is much bigger than doing something as useless as abstaining.
Traitor
Die in a fire.
How old are you? You sound
How old are you? You sound like an idiot who only hurts this movement.
um
I've been in this movement longer than you traitor. I've walked the streets. I've made and put up signs. I was a Precinct Captain. I donated money. I got several people interested in Ron Paul and they voted for him. I went door to door canvassing. I put together several canvassing parties where Ron Paul supporters went to other Precinct Captain's districts to canvas.
You gave your vote away.
Good job asshole.
Like I said, go die in a fire.
I do not care what good you
I do not care what good you think you did. By telling another person to die, you just negated it ALL in my eyes. To make matters worse, you said it to someone who is also working for Ron Paul. You are rude, and crude, and if you ARE old enuf to know better, than why don't you??
You see them now Crickett?
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
Agreed......
and had you abstained or if possible voted for Dr. Paul, it would not have changed the outcome. However, the outcome would most likely not have been unanimous decision for McLame. But in the long run, we must continue the course of ardent support for Dr. Paul and his politically and economically superior ideology.
Abstaining would not have
Abstaining would not have spread Dr. Paul's message; just the opposite. The republicans are more willing to listen to our message than they were before. Why is this so hard to understand?? Can you explain to me what your strategy is to take the party back from the outside??? Outside is where we would have found ourselves had we abstained.
Wait till you go to your
Wait till you go to your next republican county meetings. they will treat you as if the only thing you are is a McCain supporter. Have fun swallowing those hairy nuts!!
Oh lord, maya.
Makes me want to cough-up a hairball.
___________
Lisa C.
If you love freedom, please consider joining: www.campaignforliberty.com
www.women4ronpaul.com -- provider of a new backup chat room for Daily Paulers in a "plan B" situation.
Nasty girl... lol Love Ya!
I have attached a Golden Fema Ticket for those of you who vote for McCain.
__________________________
http://i537.photobucket.c...
More Willing?
You can't really believe that? Now that they know you will cave, they will be more likely to continue their drive to the socialist New World Order, with less opposition than they expected.
More willing to hear our message? You've got to be kidding.
Pay no attention
pgarcia is simply trying to justify his traitorous vote. Pay no attention to him.
Pgarcia voted for John?
Don't worry, everyone makes really stupid decisions at one time or another...
HMM...
I thought Ron Paul supporters were above peer pressure at this stage of the game. I mean think about all the crap the supporters had to go through being called loons or crazy or waste of a vote. We didnt care because we knew we were on the righteous side. The side that stood for liberty, freedom and personal responsibility
Some perspective
I ran for Maine GOP state and local office prior to Jan. 2004.
I voted for Michael Badnarik and Harry Browne, and worked for other libertarians in Maine and MA.
When I concluded that Dennis Kucinich represented me above all others in a major party, I switched party and became a national delegate pledged to Dennis, among 6 from Maine.
All 63 DNC delegates, pledged to Dennis, experienced everything that has been written in this thread and more. If I have taken one thing from the Boston DNC, it is "DON'T GIVE AN INCH". At rollcall, 42 of us voted for Dennis, even though he released all his delegates one week before.
I did not ask the others why they caved because it made no difference.
What matters in the end is leadership. I was outgunned in Boston, and you were outgunned in St. Paul. In early 2007, I change enrollment again on the day that I heard Ron Paul had thrown his own hat into the ring.
What happened in St. Paul at rollcall was entirely up to each delegate. Do not tell others that you were obligated or acted propitiously under the circumstances. If you caved, you caved; don't do it again.
Everybody, get it through your heads that rules are made to be broken by most, and enforced when it is convenient for the bigger guns. Use the rules when you can, but do not pussy out when one among you shows a little cajones and stops the meeting cold. Even at the risk of being ejected by the Sargeant, you must rally to the least among you. That is the definition of leadership. Leadership is nothing more than not being a pussy. Do not pussy out on your comrades.
The oligarchy makes it up as they go along. They are sociopaths whose lives depend upon rationalization and subjugation. You cannot deal with these people, much less influence their decissions. Take it from this old man; you cannot function by their rules. You must demand what you want, and do not ask for what you think they will give you. In the end, you won't get in anyway.
Finally, politics is not about standing in traffic circles while holding signs and shouting slogans. About 10,000 people took to the streets during convention week, more than 800 arrests including 19 journalist, and many injuries. What these people accomplished was a gift of about $10,000 or more to every cop that got assigned. Every demonstation organizer is a cop, and every cop is a criminal. Those people were mostly the age of most Ron Paul supporters, but just a little more stupid. They could have attended the Rally for the Republic with better results for liberty, and probably a little more respect for Ron Paul within the RNC.
Who among you reached out to those in the streets?
I used to be one of those hippie assholes. People my age talked to me just as I write to you, but I did not have the confidence to hear them.
This is what politics looks like. Most of you got taken aback when you discovered this. DDSOS. Welcome to my world. There is no whining in politics.
Wow Thanks for that
Wow
Thanks for that recounting of your political experience. It helps a lot from one who's been there done that and I like having it confirmed that it takes place with the dem party too.
It is harder for any of us that have not been there to know but you can make a solid claim. I am less angry now and willing to forgive these guys their mistake but I agree the consequences are A LOT of people are really pissed off at their choice and there is no whining in politics!!
Good for the movement? or themselves?
The reasoning I'm hearing most is that the delegates in MA gave up a few abstain votes in the convention in order to gain support at the state level. My question is, where is this support going? Is it really to the Liberty movement, or is it to those few delegates who made the deal?
If they want to be considered to have any principles at all, they should step down from leadership positions at the state level if any liberty-loving individual is vying for their spot, and then support the new people. The deal-makers should help raise money for these individuals in order to make up for the money raised for their delegate runs and travel to the convention, which they then turned into a McCain vote.
They want to make a deal to help our ideals - fine. But they have to prove that it isn't in their self-interest, prove that it is for the People. And they must make up to their supporters what they gave away.
Live and learn
I think the lesson to be learned from this is that next time we need to make sure we have a MAJORITY of delegates voting for liberty. This campaign was not won or lost on the floor of the GOP convention. IT was lost because we didn't get enough of our patriots to St. Paul. We need to redouble our efforts to win over the hearts and minds of real conservatives and libertarians across the country.
While I'm personally disappointed that Dr. Paul did not get more votes on the floor, I have to say that I don't completely understand the pressures that these delegates were under to vote for McCain. Perhaps they see it as a way to build political capital, an effort gain further influence in the next election. I'm disappointed for sure, but hopefully whatever sacrifice or deal they made will end up helping us WIN Massachusetts in the next cycle.
Everybody should also take a step back and look at the accomplishments of the Ron Paul Revolution. They are pretty staggering considering where we were a year and a half ago. Our team won control of the Idaho GOP...we would have won Nevada if not for political mischief...thousands of young people have been given a voice in the political process...our coalition is probably the most diverse of all the major candidates...Ron Paul set records for fund raising...and now the message of liberty has entered the mainstream. We did this all from scratch and through our own hard work and individual effort. (And of course with the help of a certain Congressman from Texas!)
Bottom line is we lost this election, but the CFL organization is now in place for us to be a bigger force in 2010. Let's focus all of this negative energy - this raw anger and emotion - towards winning next time.
Does anybody know why RP delegates voted for McCain?
Here's one good reason:
http://www.lawatchdog.com...
Hal Netkin
Its pretty apparent
From what Dr. Paul said and from what the delegates said two things happened:
1) Absolutely no support from Dr. Paul's campaign (Drew Ivers liason to the Dr. Paul Campaign) or Dr. Paul to spearhead getting Dr. Paul on the ballot. This is getting to be a repeat record-Ron's Campaign doesn't swing for the fences they just bow their heads and keep on losing. Dr. Paul might have said if we can make it happen then he'd run for President, but his campaign backslapped supporters with no commitment.
2) Total political lockdown on the Paul delegates by the mainstream republicans. This is to be expected. It looks like there were a number of rules and laws broken by the RNC to promote Unity (like confiscating of materials). Again, to be expected.
New to politics I don't know whether the Campaign is just trying to not step on too many toes. It is easy to burn bridges in politics. Or maybe they're playing by a rule book we just don't know about.
Either way its a pretty sad state of affairs when delegates are fighting to get some type of dissent on the record and the campaign you believe in let's you down.
Couldn't they have convened a press conference to let people know about the injustice at the RNC this year?
I agree and I'm pissed.
That's an astute point. The campaign doesn't like to swing for the big one. Which is why I think it's important to note that my friend Chris, who opted for this deal, was also the man spearheading the movement to get Paul on the ballot after Ivers and the C4L tried to undermine us. He displayed poor judgment in the moment with this deal and he's to be recognized for his dedication and courage under pressure in organizing and working to get Paul on the ballot so our delegates COULD vote our conscience.
Thanks for your point - both are excellent in my opinion.
All the best,
TMF
--
Todd M. Fay
Personal & Professional Coach
www.toddmfay.com
:: Support Liberty | Respect the Constitution | Restore the Republic
:: Please Join The Campaign for Liberty (www.campaignforliberty.co...)
:: Please watch "The Philosophy of Liberty"
maybe the person saying the votes
refused to recognize Ron Paul? Remember NV state convention.
No Excuses
The RP delegates were sent to represent the RP people who worked so hard to get them there. They were sent to vote for RP. At least to abstain and not vote for McCain. Unless they were threatened with bodily harm, they had NO EXCUSE in not voting for RP.
They sold us out. They betrayed us. They had no authority to take it upon themselves to "give a little to gain a lot" or "start the healing process" or "extend the olive branch". Any deals with the GOP usually involve total capitulation. Does anyone really think the GOP will change or respect people who sell out?
The best that can be said about these delegates is that they are weak, gullible and not very smart. The truth about the delegates is probably much worse in many cases.
They need to admit they wronged us, quit whining, quit trying to justify themselves, and then leave our company.
Were they bribed?
Not sure if anyone posted this pertinent article http://www.lasvegassun.co... .
I found it disturbing that the article said 2 of the RP delegates were partying at a rage against the machine rock concert. I thought I read a thread on DP a few days ago about how someone else was bribed by the McCain people with concert tickets and expenses but didn't take the bait. Why did these delegates sell their souls? Why even go to the convention if not to make a statement against the corruption? This stinks.
I haven't heard directly
but it is my understanding that these 2 NV delegates had purchased their tickets before the convention.
IT'S DOABLE
I don't believe anyone in MA took tickets...
The deal in MA between my friends and the state GOP was an exchange for bridge building measures between Ron Paul Republicans and the rest of the party.
As I've said before, I don't like how it happened, but no one did this for concert tickets. I believe they were well intentioned and did it as a measure of forward thinking to build the party.
For instance, we got tremendous support offered to us by the GOP to get supporters of ours back home on the state committee. Only people on the state committee can nominate individuals for the 10 at-large delegates in MA. Trying to get people nominated for that this past time was very difficult. With a member on the state committee, our people will have a much better chance of being able to win more slots next time around.
As far as the GOP screwing us, they haven't yet and they could have. The Executive Director of the state party is an old Pat Buchanan guy and sympathizes with us. He's also got an irregularly high amount of integrity, as it would seem a number of other people in the state party leadership do. This shouldn't come as a suprise either. There's little to be gained in MA by being a Republican. The state is controlled by the democrats. For instance, of 40 state senators only 5 are republicans. And I don't believe any of our US Reps are republicans either. So if you're working in the party in MA chances are you're doing it because you believe in what you're doing. It weeds out the opportunists.
Also on NV, my understanding is that none of the NV delegation were Paul supporters. Didn't they all get ousted before the convention? If that's true then the Paul delegates were party insiders and the conversation is moot from a standpoint of loyalty to the movement.
Anyway, that's an aside.
Again, I don't like how this all played out and no one took bribes. If I find out otherwise I'll expose them.
Thanks,
TMF
--
Todd M. Fay
Personal & Professional Coach
www.toddmfay.com
:: Support Liberty | Respect the Constitution | Restore the Republic
:: Please Join The Campaign for Liberty (www.campaignforliberty.co...)
:: Please watch "The Philosophy of Liberty"
Todd
A delegation from NV met with the GOP elecitons contest committee and the committee "allowed" 4 RP supporters as delegates and appointed the remainder of the delegates, which essentially was the preselected slate by the NV GOP. 4 delegates were sent as RP supporters.
IT'S DOABLE
Got it.
Thanks for the clarification. That must have been a tough scene being only 4 RP people in that bunch we heard was so hostile!
Yikes!
--
Todd M. Fay
Personal & Professional Coach
www.toddmfay.com
:: Support Liberty | Respect the Constitution | Restore the Republic
:: Please Join The Campaign for Liberty (www.campaignforliberty.co...)
:: Please watch "The Philosophy of Liberty"
Also after reading toddmfay's post below,
I should have hit reply on his post directly but wasn't thinking. Thought about deleting this and moving it down but I saw another poster do this so...
What do you mean by saying some Ron Paul supporters were elected as delegates? Your not elected as a delegate unless it it for a certain person. Are you saying that Ron Paul supporters are elected as McCain Delegates or that they are unbound delegates, free to vote for the person they wish? If the former, then I agree with the vote, if the latter... They are sell outs. Pure and simple.
Let me tell a story, when Goldwater came to power, he attacted a groundswell of support. Later, that support went to Regan. He was close in rhetoric to Goldwater. So much so that even Ron Paul supported his canidacy. However, he showed himself in office to not be what he sold himself as to the people that put him in power.
This mattered not. The supporters of Goldwater looked in pride at their "acomplishment" and did not realise they had sold out (Ron Paul was a rare exception). They called themselves Goldwater/Regan conservatives. Oh sure, they reasoned, Regan was not as conservative as we expected/wanted but he WON. We voted for a WINNER.
With such platitudes they continued their voting. Hey, did you notice that a conservative that adopted liberal policys got elected? It seems voters want that. It's the only way we can stay in office this term, maybe next term they would be ready and we can be more ideologically pure then but that time is not now. So they vote for a slightly more liberal man. Even though he's more liberal, they can use him to somehow slip in conservative values. It's sure to work, right?
Except that never happened. We now come to McCain. He is the most liberal "conservative" we have nominated yet but still the platitudes remain. Just get our guy in office and we can use him to bring across more conservative values. Except you can't because the abandoning of said values is exactly why "conservatives" keeps winning. The nominees TALK about things changing. Such as Roe vs Wade being abandoned but they don't mean it. Talk is talk.
So here we are, all those conservatives that had so much hope for a brighter future of limited goverment have become the greatest enablers of liberalism. But WAIT! Remember Ron Paul? The guy who rejected what Regan became? What discipline! For decades he voted his beliefs and never gave an inch. He was punished for it. Mocked and ostracized but he never. Gave. An. Inch. We should support him.
So we did. New people come in, they work hard, they become delegates. See themselves as the new Goldwater conservatives (also known as Ron Paul Revolutionaries) because the old genration totally sold out. They sold out so hard they didn't remember what they used to be like. We would be different. We learned form the past. We knew that even one step to comprimising our values will lead us to become what we hate.
"I went out to change Washington but in the end Washington changed me."
How many times have we heard that? It's HARD to retain your morals. We all know how hard and we must know that there will be many that just can't cut it. They WILL play ball. They WILL make what seems a trivial compromise in order to "get a lot". So they can become part of the machine. I will change the machine, they say, except, not this term. So they get elected and two years pass. Time to really show what I am made of, right? Except... if I am too conservative then they will not reelect me. I'll give a little to get a lot. So a second term comes by and they get reelected. Is now the time? No... Not yet, I must support the new liberal Republican nominee for president. I must be less conservative to help get him elected so that we can influence him to be more conservative then he currently is. I'll bend a little more to "get a lot".
Eventually, the people that voted for McCain will become what they hate and they won't even know they have sold their souls by the time it's over. Once again Ron Paul shows the way. He could have gone to the convention if he had endorsed McCain but he didn't because he understands, like the sell-out delegates do not. No one would have forgiven him if he had. Why do some people seem to think that what is unaceptable for Ron Paul is somehow acceptable for a Ron Paul delegate? That the smaller players can trade their integrity in "small" ways to get, what they believe is, "a lot"? This will only cause you to eventually abandon everything you stood for and become exactly what you hate.
No one says it's easy. In fact, we all knew it WOULD be hard and WOULD be thanklesss and might not get anywhere for years or even decades. You could work 10 terms in obscurity even but at least you still have your soul. This is why those that voted for McCain get no sympathy, this is why they deserve none. There is no need to hate them, no need to yell but they are on the road to conformity and are of no real use to this movement anymore. They need to be kicked from their positions in this movement.
Comprimise is not an option, ever.
The answer to your question is neither.
The answer to your question is closer to "neither" than anything.
That is to say... there were NEVER any Ron Paul delegates in MA. Running as a Ron Paul delegate was NEVER an option. That's because in MA, the number of delegates are apportioned according to a candidate's performance in the primary vote. Paul showed poorly in the primary. Only Romney and McCain did well enough to get delegates pledged to them.
That being said, when we ran (most of us I believe, if not all of us) left candidate preference off the table. We never mentioned we were RP supporters, which I was uncomfortable with but managed to do without lying since it never came up.
Anyway, so RP supporters ran in MA and won delegate slots pledged to McCain and Romney. For the McCain supporters, it is my understanding that they were pledged legally and morally (giving their word) to represent McCain's share of the popular vote at the convention.
For the Romney delegates, once they were released, they could vote for anyone on the ballot or abstain. Since McCain was the only one on the ballot they could vote for McCain or abstain.
Given that McCain was going to clean house anyway, those who executed the deal with their votes for McCain sacrificed the symbolic stance in exchange for practical measures they could use to further the revolution back home.
I don't like it AND I understand why they did it.
And, it's in the past. We've got to pass Question 1 and Question 2 here in MA to repeal the income tax and decriminalize small amounts of marijuana now.
The fight for liberty moves on!
--
Todd M. Fay
Personal & Professional Coach
www.toddmfay.com
:: Support Liberty | Respect the Constitution | Restore the Republic
:: Please Join The Campaign for Liberty (www.campaignforliberty.co...)
:: Please watch "The Philosophy of Liberty"