Chuck Baldwin states I WILL appoint Ron Paul secretary of the treasury LIVE ON AIR!
This is from an interview with Chuck Baldwin where he states he will appoint Ron Paul Secretary of the treasury.
How huge would this be? Imagine the value of our money if Ron Paul was appointed in this position!
What do you think would happen to the Federal reserve and the IRS?
This is big everyone.
link to the LIVE statement : http://www.revolutionbroa...
Dr. Steve Parent
output




















yes-
God told me to vote for Chuck Baldwin.
questions about baldwin
What is his stance on the drug war?
What is his stance on gambling? Including Internet, casino, lottery?
What is his stance on prostitution and pornography?
yea man
His views really scare me. As a pure libertarian I believe we should be free to think and live as we wish. Sadly, Baldwin has views which are quite the opposite. The very convenient excuse is "These are states right so please ignore them". That is so logically flawed it is comical. Many aspects of these issues (gay rights and gambling) cross over the jurisdiction of states rights. To suggest anything else is totally dishonest.
Wow
Baldwin got booted off the ballot in PA. This is horrible...off the ballot in CA and NY. Let us pray.
I am going to ask you nicely
I am going to ask you nicely to stop posting in my threads.
Most here know what your purpose is which has nothing to do with supporting Ron Paul or any other patriot. Now please leave my thread.
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
Steve Parent -I love you man!!!!
Steve - You are the best. Never has a convicted felon resurfaced with such gall. It is just amazing to me that anyone still gives you the time of day after you have been exposed as a common low life thief. Again, don't dare play the rumor card...your very extensive criminal record is open for public viewing. So I ask anyone reading this thread...is this the kind of person you want representing Ron Paul? A common criminal? Just say no. There are many upstanding folks here who work hard for an honest living and support the cause. Just say no to thieves and scammers please...for the sake of our children.
SGP... Why don't ya threaten him with your virtual AK again
But you're welcome to come knock on my door any time with your virtual AK you friggen nutcase ... there is a sign out front.... "Gene Pool Cleaning Service"
Nice
Along with this,
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
he's looking very favourable as a third party candidate!
It's interresting to see that more or less of a "green light" is given by the consensus of this site to Baldwin after the "Barr Meltdown". I like it.
And
what is Chuck Baldwin's own economic policy in concrete? How will he go about with the changes?When I look at the issues part of his site, I see NO heading or topic dealing with the economy directly. The Baldwin/Castle Doctrine seems to outlaw any chinese, japanese or middle-eastern type hedge fund or govt. related investment agency to own any stock. Will thos funds that already own a stake, like with Citibank, be forced to sell their stake? and if so, who will buy it up? Temasek in Singapore is a govt. investment agency and probably also has some stake in US assets. Will the Baldwin/Castle doctrine follow the golden rule and sell all US govt. stakes in other countries?
I see the Chinese and Japanese central banks, that hold most of US bonds and foreign debt, will be forced to sell. They are the ones still holding the USD at levels that are still OK, without that the USD will crush. No doubt that this economic nationalism has nothing to do with Ron Paul and will lead to a financial catastrophe, or make the current one worse.
Baldwin/Castle urgently need to rethink their doctrine!
I agree the Baldwin website
I agree the Baldwin website needs more information. I actually sent an email last week suggesting that they add the 4 issues that Ron Paul presented to the 3rd party candidates. This seems like a no brainer to me. All the 3rd party candidates need to address Monetary Policy, Foreign Policy, Privacy and the National Debt on their websites. They could lose supporters if this isn't done ASAP.
Trade with all nations; alliances with none. ~Thomas Jefferson
He can't deliver that
No president or congress can deliver that kind of promise because it's constitutionally impossible. It would infringe upon the freedom of business owners to do what they want with their business. It's a step in the right direction towards repairing the run away outsourcing condoned by the bush administration.
The Baldwin/Castle Doctrine
No foreign government or world government body or entity, not even an ally or neighbor of the US is allowed to own any portion of US roads, airports, homes, buildings, lands, waters, resources (oil, gas, precious metals, minerals, etc,), religious facilities (no matter what faith), stocks, bonds, US treasury notes, businesses, banks, military bases or military assets or manufacturing facilities in the US regardless of how much the foreign governments donate to the political campaigns or private fortunes of US officials, elected or bureaucratic, or even to the US treasury.
This is really - with respect - INSANE
I believe it is : "I deem
I believe it is : "I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government [to be] peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none..." Thomas Jefferson
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
bump
bump
bump
for Church of Baldwin
http://www.votenader.org/...
http://www.flickr.com/pho...
this needs bumped just so I can find it easier tomorrow
just got in from working home stand concession and am exhausted, but I love the sound of it!
!!!Truth is treason in the EMPIRE OF LIES!!!
I responded down below too:
1&2 are good answers.
3: While Ron Paul is a christian he doesn't wear it on his sleeve like Chuck Baldwin. Also Chuck mentions the highly polarizing figure of Jerry Falwell and the Religious Right. Even though I do believe in God I know the religious right infuriated alot of people, including myself, by being so instrumental in getting G.W. elected twice. A majority of christians have forgotten to be christian and less educated people would lump Baldwin in with this crowd-especially the more liberal or anarchistic Ron Paul supporters.
4: I don't see alot of people buying this. They'd probably say "Why don't we elect Colbert or Stewart?". If he was instrumental in any way to forward some position or get anything done for the common good (like opposing or getting a bill passed) then I'd have something to hang my hat on.
I like Baldwin, I just want to get a testament from him that he'd follow the constitution first and his religious beliefs second-something set in stone. I don't know how he could do this and still appear like a strong president. For the non-trusting public its tough to beat the no experience rock-just like Palin (who is the Governor of the largest state in the Union).
I guess we can just posit him as a protest vote. Something like if you believe in the constitution and destroying the system that controls you then vote Baldwin.
You Really Need To Watch This Video
hopefully it will address some of your concerns ...
or answer some questions -
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
peace!
Chuck Baldwin 08
Cool
Cool
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
Chuck has made it clear many
Chuck has made it clear many times LIVE on www.revolutionbroadcastin... when interviewed that would follow only the constitution and he would appoint Ron Paul the Secretary of the treasury. Go listen to some of the archived interviews of Chuck and you will hear his answer. Chuck has my vote hands down. He is the closest to Ron Paul and I support him.
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
Yes, well
there are a couple of articles written by Chuck that are online, where he definitely declares himself in opposition to Falwell on quite a few issues, and is not "a follower" of Falwell in any sense.
Yes, Chuck had affiliations with the Falwell organizations as a young person, and has no animosity against Falwell. But it has been made clear that Chuck has taken opposed positions, and he's not in the Falwell camp.
I don't like the Falwell camp, and it would give me pause to think that CB was aligned with Falwell. From what I've read in Chuck's writings, he is not aligned with Falwell.
It will be often brought up to attack him with though. So, knowledge is your friend.
As for the no experience thing, he can't manufacture any, so that will be at the mercy of whatever each voter thinks about it. It is what it is.
People really need to
People really need to research Chuck's platform befoe they make the comments they are making. Or is it just propaganda on their part?
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
Good point!
★★★Baldwin Ballot Access★★★
http://www.constitutionpa...
Thanks
I guess being a pastor is similar to being a "community organizer". I also know Larry Flynt and Jerry Falwell mended fences and became friends (with differing opinions) after a very public fight-according to Larry Flynt's biographical movie-so Jerry Falwell might not be such a bad guy after all.
Chuck Baldwin
the only logical extension of the Freedom Movement ....
who campaigned for RP and supports RP to this day...
who upholds the Constitution - and speaks out w/ truth -
This would be a most wise choice and would be awesome!
CHUCK the 2 party system Vote BALDWIN 08
Never vote for the Lesser of THREE Evils
Freedom is not FREE!!
I gave money to Barr and regret it to this day. Will support Baldwin from now on.
We don't hold it agianst you
We don't hold it agianst you many were suckered. Glad to see you are now supporting our only option now.
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
hey! awesome
You know when I summoned a young tall s.s. agent at that LANC. McCain rally, " HEY YOUNG FELLA", he came over & listened to my complaint .I told him my sign was (RON PAUL for SEC. TRES.). HE said your same thing.. RON PAUL for sec. STATE . WELL either way sounded good to me. THE Gustopo was watching me hard after that.
says
AWESOME!!
I was personally thinking Secretary of State would be incredible given the horrible state our foreign relations are in but this is good too! Just knowing that Dr. Paul is in the cabinet, in a top advisory position on most all affairs could do SOOOO much good for this country, and even the world!
If we could all decide to unite under Chuck's banner, and mobilize our troops to enroll the apathetic this could be done!
Baldwin 08- Ron Paul FOREVER!
As treasury Secreatary
Ron Paul clean books, will affect the Military Machine and foreign policy.
No money, no war
No money, no foreign aid = everyone treated equally
I think, it's even better than been president
The rally for the republic was paid in full, no debt, with grass roots donations, not with taxpayers money.
VOTE 2008
Chuck Baldwin for President
Ron Paul for Secretary of the treasury
The enemy of my enemy is not my enemy
THAT is the sign I tryed to
THAT is the sign I tryed to carry into a Mccain rally @ LANC, CO., PA.
TOLD no homemade Signs, They were everywhere W/ Mccain's name on them.
NO MO $$$$$$$
says
Uhh... Sounds like pandering to me
Been sometime since I've posted, but I've been keeping a close eye on this place.
I have to agree with Minarchist below, and especially regarding this post:
http://www.dailypaul.com/...
Baldwin or any other third party will not be winning this election, but voting third party to show dissatisfaction is imperative. Therefore, this statement is empty. It is nothing more than the type of political pandering we supposedly abhor. It is on the same level as Barr asking Paul to be VP.
Has RP accepted this offer? Has he made any inclination that he would accept? Would he give up his house seat to do so?
Come on guys we are supposed to be above this type of stuff. And honestly, all of the giddy commenters below sound similar to the new found Palin fans who take talking points at face value without evaluating the substance.
My two cents.
Not 'pandering' he's very serious.
You can ask him yourself, just friend him on Digg.
He's digging articles and leaving very informative comments and taking shouts...Great opportunity! http://digg.com/users/Chu...
:) ___________________
Where the HELL is Matt!
http://www.youtube.com/wa...
Secretary of Treasury would be good.
Last time I read from Title 26, it calls out the Secretary of the Treasury as the one with authority to enforce Internal Revenue Laws. There's no doubt in my mind that Ron Paul would properly enforce them.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe that they are free. -Goethe
Stupid and meaningless
What a blowhard. Baldwin knows (or should know) he won't even get 1/2 of 1% of the vote in the states where is on the ballot! Who he says he would appoint when he becomes president (and pigs start flying) is meaningless, and he's a blowhard for even saying it.
Don't fall for this pathetic pandering.
"Know what you know, know what you don't know, and understand and appreciate the distinction."
Minarchism
track
I'm gonna work for him in
I'm gonna work for him in AR, so...maybe it will get up to 1%? Everyone here wanted Huck or Hillary..they are ripe for a takeover to third party. Please do not denigrate my efforts before i make them. Besides, if we can get 50% of America to vote 3rd party, there is a darned good chance one of them could get a large percentage of electoral votes. Furthermore, I would bet right now, that if they DID, and McBama split the other 50%, and someone WON, any one of them would offer RP a cabinet position.
Sorry to say it, but
Sorry to say it, but politicians are still politicians no matter how high and holy one wishes them to be. They gain power by adapting to the shifting winds of public opinion.
Unrelated: ever see Austin Powers?
whenever i see your name i for some reason think of mini-me as the antichrist and chuckle through your posts.
Live Free or Diebold
The Barr campaign is over.
The Barr campaign is over. Mnay state chairman and other LP members are calling for him to step down and even David Nolan Co-founder of the LP stated yesterday DO NOT SEND THE BARR CAMPAIGN MONEY. The Barr campaign is officialy over.
My vote is going to Chuck Baldwin
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
What a ridiculous comment.
What a ridiculous comment. Turn the argument around with any other candidate and you'd say the opposite.
That makes no sense.
My argument is that Baldwin's announcement that he will appoint Dr. Paul to head the treasury should he win amounts to nothing more than blatant stupid meaningless pathetic pandering. Heck, that's not even an argument. It's essentially true by definition, based solely on the axiomatic premise that there is no way Baldwin will win.
Anyway, how do you turn this argument around? What does that even mean?
"Know what you know, know what you don't know, and understand and appreciate the distinction."
Minarchism
track
Exactly.
Exactly.
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitut...
www.revolutionbroadcastin...
Dr. Steve Parent
But if....
But if Barr was to say this you'd be screaming it from the mountain tops.
ummm...but he didn't....and you are a truly negative person. I have to wonder why. I understand that you support Barr and that's cool....but why can't you respect the fact that others support Baldwin...or Nader...or McKinney even????
The message of Liberty brings us together....unless of course you really aren't here for Liberty.
No, I wouldn't
You must have me confused with someone else.
When Barr does something stupid, I point out that he's an idiot, as I did over his stupid decision to not attend Ron Paul's press conference on Wednesday.
And if he said he would appoint RP secretary of treasury, I would say that's stupid and meaningless pandering too. Because it is, no matter which minor party candidate does it.
And I respect everyone's right to support whoever they want, I just would urge everyone to not fall for stupid blatant pathetic pandering. I also think it's important on this forum to explain why, those of us who support the message of liberty, should vote for the LP nominee, no matter how big of a jerk he is (and we've got a doozie this year). But that's in another thread...
"Know what you know, know what you don't know, and understand and appreciate the distinction."
Minarchism
track
BUMP
Because ....well...because I want to damn it!
YES
That's the kind of stuff I want to hear.
Chuck '08
I'm sure Baldwin
would be proud to appoint Paul anywhere he wanted to be :)
why not give him the State Dept also?
His foreign policy is spot-on.
is there a way to get DIGG
is there a way to get DIGG on this?
If this doesn't align 3rd Party voters, I don't know what will.
Now all I have to do is quickly move out of California, and establish residence in a state where I can vote for Chuck Baldwin...
Any chance still of Baldwin getting on the CA ballot?