USA Today Front Page Problem NOW

The mockingbirds in the media tend to reinforce the fraudulent left-right paradigm and the very sloth-like idea that "nothing can be done about it" therefore we have no choice but to either drop out of the process entirely or tacitly reinforce the very system which offers so few real alternatives.

But of course there is a third way that the War Party and its apologists in the media won't talk about--that of freedom. And that is why we are here on the Daily Paul.

----
Support H.R. 6594 to give 9/11 First Responders (heroes) the help that they need and deserve. Watch "Dust to Dust" and "Dust to Deceit" to learn about the ongoing 9/11 Holocaust.

USATomorrow ....

...neither is responding to a telephone survey/poll.

And I won't even mention how current polling methodologies omit the fast growing segment of cell-phone only households (like myself and almost all of my friends and family).

Speaking of friends and family, how many of yours favor bailing out Wall Street? None of the people that I have talked to favor this National Socialism.

----
Support H.R. 6594 to give 9/11 First Responders (heroes) the help that they need and deserve. Watch "Dust to Dust" and "Dust to Deceit" to learn about the ongoing 9/11 Holocaust.

I'm sure you were in the middle of a comforting CFR dream.

The articles states that like 56% want something, but not Bush's bailout of UP TO 700 billion. We all know that is the floor, and it is way below the ceiling which is like the "war on terra"...endless. So misleading is a mild way to describe it. However on a bright note, these are the comments on the first page, and I didn't take a single "pro bailout" comment off. Looks like we the people still agree...no bailout!

smartdecisions wrote: 6m ago
I don't know anyone who is in favor of this bail out.
I work in the financial industry and the long and short of it is that the market always corrects itself. We might crash, we might not but the market always bounces back.

A bail out of any size will do damage to the system. That money will never get paid back, taking $700B of taxpayers money that could have gone to some good and throwing it away forever. We'll be in even worse shape in the long run if we put this band-aid in to effect.
It's like the stimulous package or the "tax free gas summer"...it's a band-aid, short-term. No one is thinking about the long-term!

George76039 wrote: 8m ago
If you want real change, vote NEITHER in November.

The Eagle wrote: 10m ago
This poll is so much BS.....
When I ask people "should we bail out WallStreet", I have not heard one yes.
CNN and or Gallop are Flat out Lying to the readers.
They are paid by the WallSTreet group thru advertising....so they are here to help.
Citizens do not advertise or pay for Gallop Polls......
This article is very misleading to be kind.

JinxRudy wrote: 13m ago
Let me guess what the poll question was. "Do you a.) support the government taking action to help solve the financial crisis, or b.) feel that the government should take no action?"
My guess is that no where in their poll did they mention the words "$700billion" or "bailout".
Just a thought

Jim Lundberg wrote: 17m ago
I would believe 78% AGAINST it. This poll is obvious politically backed. Intended to shift opinion, not sample it.

ras2178 wrote: 20m ago
78% � say Congress should approve a historic bailout of the nation's financial markets------Only 11% in the poll taken Wednesday night say Congress should take no action to ease the current credit crisis-------22% want lawmakers to approve a plan similar to Bush's proposal------- 40% of poll respondents said it's the biggest crisis in their lifetime; 24% agree it's a crisis but say it's not the worst. However, 80% say they're following news -------If lawmakers do nothing, 74% believe the economy would get worse------100% THINKS ALL OF THIS IS BULL!!!!

xBugOwner wrote: 27m ago
< < I JUST LOST $10,000 THANKS TO McCAIN'S PLOY > >
WaMu DEPOSITORS are covered by FDIC.
I've been holding a WaMu BOND in my IRA (no selling that these last weeks) that has just gone to $0.
It was investment grade when I bought it.
Red or blue, best go check your accounts. Maybe you can bail out of an investment like Sen. Flameout did on the "bailout"

ras2178 wrote: 28m ago
92% of the people use laptops instead of desktops, and uhhhh 86% of the people love their current jobs. Wow I can make up number too!!!

ras2178 wrote: 30m ago
Are they polling people on Wall street? 0% of the people I know want this bailout.

chillipepper wrote: 32m ago
I have said many times that we need a revolution. The government (I said government because whether it is the democrats or republican it doesn't matter) are taking us for a ride. They are also highly paid and get all the perks. We the people get screwed let and right. Why don't all these congressman, senators, etc.. cut first their salaries. Next move all their pension funds to social security and just like all of us live the rule of social security. They raised our age for eligibility on SS but for them they have their own pension fund that they could withdraw at age 55. Many a times we get tax and we get nothing in return except debt debts and debtsss. Even though countries like, England, Canada, etc.. has high taxes.. people in those countries doesn't have to worry about health care, retirement, etc. WE DO AND WE ARE ALSO TAX AS MUCH NOW WHEN ALL THESE ADDS UP. The government is as inefficient as all those CEOs so call expert with experience.

http://digg.com/business_finance/USA_Today_lying_on_thier_ow...

with 36

http://digg.com/business_finance/USA_Today_lying_on_thier_ow...

Ron Paul's Convention Speech

The headline is most important, and also happens to be the most deceptive.

Ron Paul's Convention Speech

I think we're inventing a new Internet meme... "FYF"!

Just like LMAO, FFS and RTFM before it.

Ron Paul's Convention Speech

I dont have to make my house payment or truck payment. Here is a idea, 700 billion bailout to the banksters or 300 million....million dollar checks given to the people, at least we could buy some gas and ramen noodles after this is all over.

Nope. There are laws against libel and slander, but not "misreporting".