AMERO- this is getting pretty weird

Yeah, it's real, it's a real GOLD, SILVER AND COPPER coin that you can buy from Dan Carr and his company Designs Compute, which by the way designed and "minted" the coins as "fantasy coins". They are "minted" by a private company just like the Ron Paul Liberty Dollars are "minted" by a private company FOR PROFIT.

It would indeed be amazing that there would be a SOUND MONEY coin used by the NAU as a replacement for the Fiat System. Yeah, that really makes sense for the NWO to be interested in replacing Fiat Money with Sound Gold and Silver Money.

Chew before you swallow folks, chew before you swallow....... gullibility is not a virtue.

http://www.1776solution.b...

Ahem, have you read this?

http://oldfraser.lexi.net...

"I prefer the truth, usually it is much more intriguing and far more treacherous. "

I agree....Hal Turner is a hack, making his money by sensationalizing various subjects whether they are factual or not…why turn to him when you can easily get the correct information directly from the horse’s mouth, they have never been very secretive about their intentions. The AMERO is bunk. There is however, no doubt, none whatsoever, that the Fabian Socialists and one of its offspring the CFR seek to eliminate or at the very least to diminish the Sovereignty of countries.

We don’t have to look far to find exactly what the plans are of the Fabian Socialist NWO, they have, for decades, spelled out their plans in a very “Open Conspiracy” for all to see. Indeed, the effective branch of the Fabians in this country has been the Council on Foreign Relations, the brain-child of Colonel Edward Mandell House. Another founder of the CFR was John Foster Dulles and he was very clear about the direction the CFR sought to take this country:

“Some dilution or leveling off of the sovereignty system as it prevails in the world today must take place to the immediate disadvantage of those nations which now possess the preponderance of power. The United States must be prepared to make sacrifices afterward in setting up a world politico-economic order which would level off inequalities of economic opportunity with respect to nations.”

Here is some of the intentions of the CFR to implement a North American Union:

In 2001, The Atlanta Roundtable held a session, the second one, to discuss the future of North American “integration”. Robert A. Pastor, of Emory University, led the discussion, which included Gordon D. Giffin, the former Ambassador to Canada.

Bob Pastor’s Recommendations are as follows:

A lean advisory North American Commission whose purpose is to set the agenda for Summit meetings by the three leaders. The Commission would prepare proposals to help the leaders think about issues from a continental standpoint. Instead of two parliamentary groups—the U.S.-Mexican and U.S. -Canadian—he proposed a single North American parliamentary group to help all sides.

A new model within the U.S. government to manage North American affairs is essential. He proposed a White House based model whereby the Coordinator for North American affairs would chair an Inter-Agency Group on North America and report through the National Security Adviser and the Domestic Policy Adviser to the President. An alternative model is a State Department structure, at the Undersecretary level. (He has developed both proposals in his new book, Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New, Institute for International Economics, August 2001).

A permanent court on trade and investment to replace the ad hoc mechanisms that have had problems of conflict of interest.

A customs union that establishes a common external tariff and removes customs requirement between the countries, moving us a step closer to a common market.

A perimeter formula that would put together a North American core of immigration and customs law enforcement officers. The officers would be trained by all three countries in a single unit and would be responsible for enforcing the perimeter of immigration. This model would reduce by half the customs and immigration documentation to cross the border.

A North American Development Fund so that all three countries contribute a proportion of their wealth to help with education and building infrastructure in Mexico.

Gordon Giffin’s Recommendations are as follows:

Allocate more resources to the U.S.-Canadian 5,500 mile border to make it more efficient. We had 9,000 officers of immigration, customs, and border control assigned to Mexico and only 900 assigned to Canada. September 11 has given the political will to address an issue that should have been addressed long ago, and Congress has now appropriated money for 1,000 people on the Canadian border.

Enhance the movement of a legitimate person so that more time can be spent on the illegitimate person. We need to document people and goods so that they move more quickly, i.e. a North American pass that requires a cursory background check done.

Clear commercial trucks remotely so that they don’t clog the border.
Reorganize all of our border functions into one department, one agency, so there is more efficient operations. The INS is in the Justice Department, the Customs is in the Treasury, and the Coast Guard is in Transportation. As a result, they have different bosses, different policies, and different levels of accountability.

Balance our need for security and our need for the continent to be integrated. We cannot impose unilateral solutions from Washington. We need to have a dialogue and to collaborate with both Canada and Mexico.

Now, in 2005, the following recommendations were made regarding the North American “integration”:

Findings and recommendations:

Build a North American economic and security community by 2010. To enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity for all North Americans, the chairs propose a community defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter.

Create the institutions necessary for a North American community. The chairs propose annual summit meetings among the three countries and the creation of a North American Advisory Council to prepare for and implement the decisions made at the summits.

Enhance North American competitiveness with a common external tariff. Over the last decade, nations around the world, from China to India to Latin America to the expanded membership of the European Union, have become increasingly integrated into the global market. To meet these challenges to North American competitiveness, the chairs recommend that the three governments negotiate a common external tariff on a sector-by-sector basis at the lowest rate consistent with multilateral obligations: "Unwieldy rules of origin, increasing congestion at ports of entry, and regulatory differences among the three countries raise our costs instead of reducing them."

Develop a border pass for North Americans. The chairs propose a border pass, with biometric indicators, which would allow expedited passage through customs, immigration, and airport security throughout North America. "The governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically reducing the need for physical scrutiny of traffic, travel, and trade within North America."

Adopt a unified Border Action Plan. The three governments should "strive toward a situation in which a terrorist trying to penetrate our borders will have an equally hard time doing so no matter which country he elects to enter first.

"First steps should include: harmonized visa and asylum regulations; joint inspection of container traffic entering North American ports; and synchronized screening and tracking of people, goods, and vessels, including integrated "watch" lists. Security cooperation should extend to counterterrorism and law enforcement, and could include the establishment of a trinational threat intelligence center and joint training for law enforcement officials. On the defense front, the most important step is to expand the binational North American Aerospace Defense Command to make it a multi-service Canada-U.S. command with a mandate to protect the maritime as well as air approaches to North America. Canada and the United States should invite Mexico to consider closer military cooperation in the future.

Narrow the development gap with Mexico. While trade and investment flows have increased dramatically, the development gap between Mexico and its two northern neighbors has widened. "Low wages and lack of economic opportunity in parts of Mexico stimulate undocumented immigration, and contribute to human suffering, which sometimes translates into violence." Mexico must increase its rate of economic growth and decide on the steps it will take to attract investment and stimulate growth. As a matter of their own national interests, the United States and Canada should assist Mexico by establishing a North American Investment Fund, designed to channel resources for the purpose of connecting the poorer parts of the country to the markets in the north.

Develop a North American energy and natural resource security strategy. Canada and Mexico are the two largest oil exporters to the United States; Canada alone supplies the United States with over 95% of its imported natural gas and 100% of its imported electricity. The three governments should expand and protect energy infrastructure, fully exploit continental reserves, conserve fossil fuels, and reduce emissions. "Regional collaboration on conservation and emissions could form the basis for a North American alternative to the Kyoto protocol."

Deepen educational ties. "Given its historical, cultural, political, and economic ties, North America should have the largest educational exchange network in the world." To that end, the chairs recommend expanding scholarship and exchange programs, developing Centers for North American Studies in all three countries, and cross-border training programs for school teachers.

Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments.

The Mexican Council on Foreign Relations(COMEXI) is the only multi-disciplinary organization committed to fostering sophisticated, broadly inclusive political discourse and analysis on the nature of Mexico's participation in the international arena and the relative influence of Mexico's increasingly global orientation on domestic priorities. The Council is an independent, non-profit, pluralistic forum, with no government or institutional ties that is financed exclusively by membership dues and corporate support. The main objectives of COMEXI are to provide information and analysis of interest to our associates, as well as to create a solid institutional framework for the exchange of ideas concerning pressing world issues that affect our country.

Founded in 1976, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives is Canada's premier business association, with an outstanding record of achievement in matching entrepreneurial initiative with sound public policy choices. A not-for-profit, non-partisan organization composed of the chief executives of 150 leading Canadian enterprises, the CCCE was the Canadian private sector leader in the development and promotion of the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement during the 1980s and of the subsequent trilateral North American Free Trade Agreement.

http://www.1776solution.b...

really?

EXACTLY...

http://www.1776solution.b...

...the nafta corridor is a novelty too?

There's only one thing I don't believe about the amero: that it will be based on silver. That would take power away from the money changers.

Other than that I believe this guy

http://www.youtube.com/wa...