*****Alex Jones' Review of "Zeitgeist Addendum"*****

The film says how everything should be and most likely is going to be automated in the future and we should embrace that,...Alex is saying that the elite control all these new technologies, so if everything were automated they would'nt need the public around. If you think about it, I'm sure there is tons of supressed technology that only the elite have...so if were not allowed to use it now, what makes you think we would be able to use it in the future. In a ideolisitc perfect world the film is right, in the real world Alex is right. Now they key is to create a future somewhere in the middle. Get rid of the elite, then maybe we could create this utopia that addendum talks about.

VOTE CHUCK BALDWIN

the first time I saw Zeitgeist a year ago I was really into it. I did wonder about some of the edit techniques though, very hypnotic!

then the new one came out and I thought again - very hypnotic!

this film is very crafty. I now think Alex Jones may be right on with some of his ideas about it.

don't buy everything!

www.baldwin08.com - Chuck Baldwin or New World Order!

I'm watching his review in parts, now, and he doesn't seem to be doing a hit piece on the film, so much as reinforcing salient points about the economy, Marxism, the New World Order, and so on. Of course I'm not all the way through his review, but that's how it sounds to me.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

Well, if you take Alex Jones' interpretation and opinion on this movie at face value, then good luck. He is completely distorting what they are saying and drawing his own erroneous conclusions.

Alex Jones took the courageous step of taking the film makers at their word.

How did the makers of Zeitgeist Addendum plan to arrive at the technocratic utopia of the Venus Project?

From my experience as a former socialist, I tend to classify lefties according to their willingness to ask the "HOW?" question.

At one end of the spectrum we have the cranky old anarchist in Zeitgeist Addendum who would probably have an apoplectic fit if you tried to ask him HOW we get from HERE and NOW to THERE and THEN.

At the other end of the spectrum you have the scary-ass Commies who sometimes have it all worked out. Like the guys who issued this leaflet dated October 1st 2008:

http://www.cpgb-ml.org/do...

Many people start off at the Zeitgeist Addendum end of the lefty spectrum and end up at the scary ass Stalinist end when they get frustrated at the lack of progress towards Utopia.

http://uk.youtube.com/wat...

http://www.freedom-force....

http://lpuk.blogspot.com/

and this movie I came across lately. From what I've found the first Zeitgeist was shown in Nov. 07. This movie came out Oct 07. I would like to know if anyone else has seen this one to compare?
http://video.google.com/v...

morning I had a hell of a hangover.

the movie. How did they get brainwashed?????? OHHHHH, scary.

http://www.earthaven.org/

http://www.blackmountain....

Downloaded it from google: even though I know that it's a waste.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
The "light", the "dot", at the very beginning is or can be used as a brain manipulation thingy, then the all enveloping bright flash of white light. Some say it's for the purpose of catching your attention, you know, more excitin'. The sound at this time is very similar to, if not a "chopper", "helicopter", military sound for what purpose?

The moment (from the very beginning) they start the "space music", it appears to be "space music" anyway, "military sounds" mixed in with but is actually the predominate, then the "machine gun"; ought to be an "immediate alarm". Some could say that this music is too: catch your interest, make it more exciting. This is not normal music, not normal sound(s). What else are they catchin'?

The colored eye-pulsating music: is in tune with the pulse of the pupil moving in and out. Brainwashing technique? Some say: "cool, with-it, hip, up-town, gettin' it on, excitin'".

Next: the flashes: of military showing weapon(s); of "people suffering" including one of the Twin Towers smoking, a plane hitting the Tower and people falling from a Twin Tower, whats the purpose, can be used as a brain deadening technique and can be used as an embedding, injecting thought(s). Can your mind catch all of these flashes? What else can be subtlety added that you're unaware of? ALL NEGATIVITY!

This is just 57 seconds or so into it! And, there are things that I have missed.
... ... ... ... ... ...
Laugh, their just "screwin' with ya". Too what extent?

I'm not paranoid but I'm not stupid either.

IT'S THE NEW WORLD ORDER, has their signature!

And reposting the same stuff just to bump the thread... why the heck not do it again, right?

It's not a "film" its a piece of hypnotic propaganda full of BS.

It's a standard propaganda play piece, and you've been suckered into promoting it.

1) Use a few facts that the targeted viewer is likely to (predisposed to) agree with or find revelatory.

2) Add in a bunch of vague universally recognized and commonly desired "goals."

3) Throw out some additional vague promises of a "free lunch" via technology, or "science" or ___________.

4) Since you now have the viewer in an "agreeable" state of mind and willingly suspending their disbelief and discernment -- and you can now safely add in a host of lies, label specific scapegoats as the "bogeymen" that are preventing all of the desired goals.

5) Then, pull in all together in some nice utopian "dream world."

6) Get the (now convinced) viewer to proselytize for your cause.

Ba-bing, ba-bang, ba-boom... a new "convert" has been created.

This will always work with those who are young, idealistic, and or easily impressionable (and likewise thoroughly ignorant of history, science, and reality -- and are therefore lacking in discernment and are easy rubes.)

Sickening.

Oops, almost forgot step 7) Charge for copies or solicit donations or sell "auxiliary merchandise" and... PROFIT! (Cha-ching!)

Posted this on another thread;
I agree with geeksneek
I have been watching on this forum and others how everyone is either pissed off or totally "ga ga" over Zeitgeist addendum ... I had to watch it just because of the controversy. I think the movie had some great points and I don't believe there is anything "dangerous" in the movie only opinions and imagination that can be agreed on or not. I see the "Venus Project" as a beginning discussion of our need for a new paradigm shift with our concept of money and yes I see flaws with the model. I do not see service oriented needs disappearing anytime soon and robots will never be able to replace those services. How will you convince some to work giving service to others in a consistent way without some sort of incentive with out forcing them in some way. (ie laws or rules of society).We need ideas of imagination,creativity, and we need to understand this is uncharted territory. I can understand how religious people are pissed off with this movie and I am truly sorry the movie makers chose to alienate these people because it was not necessary. However this movie is doing what it was meant to do. It's a powerful catalyst for discussion about our next step, our new paradigm, what we want, what we don't want. Like it, love it or hate it.... this movie has gotten people talking, arguing and hashing out what's next, so for that I give this movie an A +