AFTER THE O-BOMB - Meditation in time of disillusion

More than 98 % of the people who cared to go to the elections voting for the two NWO-actors . This is devestating! As some kind of foreign legionaire in 'Fort Positive' on the Daily Paul who spend many hours not only with chatting and posting on various blogs but who was online canvassing among Ron Paul meetup groups (Wonder how many of them voted for the 'lesser evil' now?) I felt distraught about the picayune affect the Ron Paul movement had on the actual elections.
Though at least after Super Tuesday the chance for Ron Paul to win the nomination or even the presidency was slim, my hope was: with a victory in at least one state during the primaries or a strong minority at the convention, he couldn't be ignored anymore by our MSM in Europe, finally igniting a discussion in my neo-con/"socialdemocrat" - ridden country too. My last hope was a significant outcome for the third party-candidates and Ron Paul (at least 10 % together). But alas!
So if even in your country with a great tradition of liberty and Ron Paul as a prophet, corporate fascism (with a smile) is taking over by democratic consensus, how will be the future of my country ? And actually I'am afraid Obama will help to bring the NWO's agenda forward in a way not possible for GWB or McCain, because people around the world may give credit to Obama as they never would get.
Obviously this is a moment each of us has to think, if and how he will contribute to the Ron Paul movement in the future. (I call it the 'Ron Paul movement' since the personality of Ron Paul brought people of various backrounds and political leanings (not only libertarians) together for a common cause.)
Times are getting rough. No one knows that better than we. Maybe it's the beginning of (as Ron Paul experessed it once) a long period of hibernation for liberty. And I think it's legitimate to ask yourself, if one shouldn't only care for himself and the loved one's instead of promoting the massage of liberty to the sheeple.
The take of xcntryk1 comes near to my view. She posted:

Ron Paul was our last best hope for electoral success...
On November 8th, 2008 xntryk1 says:
...in this completely rigged game. Sadly, I don't think even he realized this. By constantly stressing it was about the message ("Freedom is popular"), and NOT about the messenger (him), he was wrong. It was the combination of the two that sparked the RP revolution - the message of freedom spoken by a man who has consistently fought for freedom all his adult life (and has a voting record to back it up). Plus the fact that he was "allowed" to be heard, solely because he was playing by their rules (by affiliating himself with one half of the bipartisan oligarchy). When he started pulling in the big bucks, winning every poll, drawing huge crowds, etc., it was enough to bring even this long-time cynic back into the fold for one last vote (I was an RP supporter, long before I decided to involve myself in the stupid voting farce, again). But when it became obvious that the PTB (in the media and GOP) were not even going to allow him a fair shot on a level playing field - even though he was playing by their rules (and not running as a 3rd party candidate) - the game was already over.
There's not likely to be another winning combination like that (strong message + honest, principled messenger + mainstream exposure) in a LONG time, if ever. Without Ron Paul, all we've got is the message. It's recently been proven without a shadow of a doubt that 99% of the voting public is NOT interested in that message. Or at the very least, they're more interested in OTHER messages (free lunches, etc.). So that message isn't going to win any elections, anytime soon. Primarily because the PTB are not going to allow it to even come CLOSE to be heard by enough people (even if gov't school indoctrination somehow fails, and people actually WANT to hear that message). Such being the case, Einstein's supposed diagnosis most certainly seems to apply, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
This is not to say, "Give up hope, all is lost!" On the contrary, all is NOT lost - IF enough people are REALLY willing to do what it takes - "mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor." Instead of continuing to do the same thing over and over again, with the exact same results every single go-round, it would seem to be time (some, like myself, would say WAY past time) to try a different tack. One that doesn't involve playing their game by their rules. Quite the opposite in fact. Stop ALL dealing with government. Stop ALL dealing with banks. Disobey or ignore unjust laws. Act like a free person instead of a slave or a child. A quote from Thoreau comes to mind, "Under a government which imprisons unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison." They can't throw all of us in prison, especially those of us who are armed (which we all should be at this point). Another quote comes to mind, "People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." ~ V
That my friends is the ONLY way things are ever going to change in this country - if the government is once again afraid of the people. And it doesn't even require violence on our part to make them afraid of us. All it requires is withholding consent. Don't consent to be enslaved by their banks OR by an illegal, rogue government. Simply stop playing their games and the entire house of cards will come crashing down. Final quote for the day, "I didn't say it would be easy. I just said it would be the truth." ~ Morpheus. :-)

My own take is, that I will not foresake the 'fellows in arms' I have got during this campaign, and of course Ron Paul is still our prophet, but from now on, this movement should be much more about to promote one another in our individual struggle for liberty. All this Free State projects come back to my mind and also the project of the Fellowship of the White Rose though it will need to be revamped.