RJ Harris - Saving the Republic

No anger here....Please understand that i think you are doing great things. More then most. While I may disagree with how best to restore our Republic, we surly agree that it needs restoring!

you wrote: "Please don't be so filled with anger that you become willing to lash out at even those called to fight for you."

But listen up friend....I have called no one to "fight for me" I am an individual that will fight for myself. I appreciate your fight, but you are doing it for the Republic not me. I am not "lashing out or angry"...I am simply throwing in my 2 cents, just because i may not agree 100% does not mean i dislike you or am angry at you or any other assumptions. In fact i am just like you...I too want real change.

If i come off angry, i apologize, it is not my intent. Your plan is a difficult one that will require lots of people, money, and time. Not to mention working within a system i believe to be too broken to work within. But assuming we can accomplish all of that...we are then in a situation that we will rely on the newly elected "good person" to fix everything.

If that elected official turns out to be less then we hoped we have done much work for nothing.

If that elected official is turned to the "darkside" (for lack of a better term) we again are screwed.

If that elected official simply does not understand an issue as it relates to the Constitution, they may vote to enslave us with out knowing it...

There were plenty of good honest men in congress in 1913 who voted for the Federal Reserve Act and never would have thought they were doing what they did. the folks looking to enslave us are not going to draft a bill called "Enslaving act of 2010"...

My post does not make any sense? How so? I pointed out how he was off the mark in my first sentence. here i will do it again for you: RJ's plan boils down to "elect good people, who will pledge to never enslave us". Our founders warned against placing trust in men. Planning to fix the problem of our representatives not obeying their oath, by electing "better" people is naive at best.

I will surly vote for "honest and good people" but that does not mean it will restore our Republic or our Constitution. Ron Paul is rare and not easy to find. Supporting people who claim to be "Ron Paul republicans" is a good start and I am not trying to "stir up trouble". But remember History...even recent history, such as Bob Barr. He claimed to be one of us...but take a look at what he really became as the campaign progressed. To trust in people is foolish. And anyone can make a pledge. Millions thought that Obama's many "pledges" to restore the rule of law were honest and they voted for him based on those pledges. Where has that gotten us?

Listen if you disagree with me that is your right and i respect that. But to dismiss my points by claiming I don;t make sense, yet fail to show how, is not the way to advance your argument. Blurting out that his motto is "restoring the republic" is no argument at all. If we are to advance liberty we need open debate...but you are criticizing my thoughts with fluff. Not sure how me making direct quotes and references is considered by you as "nonsensical garbage"....

If you are so full of research then provide it, don't just bash with lines like "I hate when people don't research things " how does that make any sense at all? I am open to hear how i am wrong in my judgment of RJ's plan, but you will need more then .....

"He says he is a constitutional conservative and will vow to follow the constitution" now that my friend is fluff.