John Ziegler Arrest - Update
I was going to update my post about this but it seems to have disappeared...so here is a new one.
Journalist John Ziegler tells the story and has video of what really happened outside of USC the day he tried to hand out his DVDs.
John was totally shocked by this as he had told people NOT to come and protest, because he just wanted to talk to people. He was NOT on private property and he was NOT trying to get into the event. The two photographers were not with him as they stated and he was doing nothing to warrant being arrested.
It seems that the media is at war with each other. If you note, the Annenberg Foundation, the ones who were giving this bogus Walter Cronkite (globalist) Award is the very group that enabled domestic terrorist William Ayers to now be in our colleges teaching the teachers of our children.
- Jane Aitken's blog
- Login or register to post comments














Think next time.
Look, the cops made it clear and so did everyone else- they didn't want you where you were. MOVE. Save yourself the trouble of messing with the police- they always win and they don't really care what the law says or what your thoughts of the Constitution are.
Don't think of yourself some sort of victim or hero.
I think that it is important....
to MAKE them obey the law and constitution! Go along to get along. Never.
bump.
I hope he can publicize this successfully and get the public apology he requested. He has the proof.
Good for him
He didn't break any laws or harm a soul and was handcuffed and abused by police. His violation was that he asserted his rights. That's a no-no.
I hope he does pursue the cops involved for arresting him with no substantial grounds.
Media Malpractice
I recommend his movies Media Malpractice and Blocking the Path to 9/11.
Thanks for the update,
Jane...bump.
Just some thoughts
1) He didn't move where the police told him to move. I'm not saying he deserved an arrest, but that information should have been given at the beginning of the newscast. Instead, they waste your time giving you the impression he yielded to them entirely.
2) Off topic: I disagree that Couric's interview was unfair. She exposed Palin's flightiness and inability to forge a counter-attack when under fire.
Just Some Questions
1) Why are you here?
2) Why do you believe that "police" have the right to tell you where to "move" to?
3) Why should he "yield" to them at all..under what law must he do so and what are the limitations of this "law"?
4) Do you believe such laws are "good" laws and should be upheld and if so....
5) Wouldn't you be happier at the Daily Kos?
**“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” ~ Mark Twain **
To answer those questions...
1. Because we want to be.
2. Because they won't pay my medical bills when they beat me up over a stupid incident like the video shows.
3. Read the answer to #3 above.
4. Yes, I believe those laws are as good as you think abortion is bad.
5. I don't know- I've never heard of or know what kos is.
I think you'll find that Palin voting for RP was an error on her part. I think she intended to vote for McCain but hit the wrong button.
Palin is a dingbat and someone on here wants a Rand Paul/Sarah Palin ticket for president in 2012?!
Couric did expose that, but
Couric did expose that, but did not even try with others.