Maddow on Obama's "Indefinite Detention" & Unconstitutional Power Grab

The man is not only repeating all of FDR's economic mistakes, he's ready to incarcerate people without trial, as FDR did to the Japanese-Americans.

I know that there are a bunch of people looking for grounds to impeach him. There it is.

-jcr

*

.
.
.
.
Paper Ballots Hand Counted At The Precinct Or Bust
Support WTP Federal Supreme Court Case To Ban All Electronic Voting Or Forget 2010 or 2012
Donate to WTP here: http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/00-Donate.htm

Almost six weeks ago in Keene, New Hampshire, Videographer Sam Dodson was filming in the district court lobby. He was arrested and went limp (in the classic "I will not assist you" mode). He did not provide his name asserting his (supposed) right to remain silent. He has been denied due process and has not been able to go before the court.
Many writs of habeas corpus have been filed up to the New Hampshire supreme court, all to no avail. Wiki defines it as "You (shall) have the body[1]) is a legal action, or writ, through which a person can seek relief from the unlawful detention of him or herself, or of another person. It protects the individual from harming him or herself, or from being harmed by the judicial system. The writ of habeas corpus has historically been an important instrument for the safeguarding of individual freedom against arbitrary state action."
Sam is in limbo, in fact the judge is hinting around about his "competency" to stand trail. So, in a classic tyrannical move, they may cover themselves by finding a quack to deem him incompetent and lock him away in a hospital for God knows how long. Sam is an activist with the Free State Project, not a dangerous criminal.
Check out Sam's plight here http://freesamdodson.com/
Thanks

Obama speaks intelligently but is passing along bs. Get him out of office!

www.Vote3rdPartynow.org

Rachel really put it in perspective. And I'm glad to see some people from the left are openly criticizing the President.

It seems to be going well so far - I haven't heard of any protests or upset.

Is a poll coming?

Ron Paul's Convention Speech

He did quote Churchill for the benefit of his position against Cheney and torture. Okay, maybe this was just another distraction...

Now the pieces of the puzzle are starting to fit. Look: Indefinite Detention, Forced Triple Vaccination, FEMA coffins. All I have to say is that somebody is damned desperate to beat us because we're finally beating them at their game! AMERIKKKA here we come. :(

Obama serious.
When he speaks is it like watching someone watching a tennis match.
When he tries to look statesmanish I just think "bad acting job"
And when he talks about the constitution I think "natural born citizen"
What a joke.

------------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters."
Rosa Luxemburg

"don't pass this law in the future". Sorry, but the Obamanator does not fool us with his forked-tongue repetitive circular triple-speak.

after seeing an earlier interview of her's with a guy...oh...i can't remember....her was a professor of something and it was posted here a few weeks back.....

this is very different from that other one.she was practically
deleted for inappropriate sexual content. ~ Mod
on the other one.

look at this youtube :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qR7JUUv2T4s

I kinda like her now.

us all up..

and it's very hard to get details about who Obama is planning to detain. Obviously he already has people slated for this Nazi treatment; however, he made it clear that he's not talking about Guantanamo or a Afghanistan or people who would show up on a battlefield.

Who is he planning to detain?

Rep. Peter King is saying some non-felon, non-criminals in America are "Dangerous Terrorists" and trying to disarm them. Obviously they are not really dangerous terrorists or they would have been jailed or deported. Is the government now calling anyone it is suspicious of a"Dangerous Terrrorist"? What is the criteria to be considered a "Dangerous Terrorist," if a person doesn't have to be either dangerous or a terrorist to qualify for that designation?

Perhaps everyone targeted in the Right-Wing Extremism report is not only a "Right-Wing Extremist" but a "Dangerous Terrorist"? All this rather groundless and escalating name-calling is eerie and suggests that people are being sorted. Sorted for what purpose? Indefinite detainment?

In other words, friends....will we meet in the Gulag after all??

Does that unthinkable, nightmare scenario sound as possible to you to you as it sounds to me?

Even if we are in no wise the target (yet) for our essentially benign political leanings, is it even worth being an American and enjoying all the privileges and securities of this nation, if that security requires keeping massive numbers of innocent people behind bars and killing others, like all the brutal regimes of the past century? If we have to remain cold-hearted and oblivious in order to enjoy the higher standard of living available to us???

I don't think so. It's unconscionable.

So aren't they responsible for the abuses they're now reporting ?

Funny how the media ignores all the negatives about a candidate when accepting money for campaign ads from the richer of 2 evils.

"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison
without formulating any charge known to the law, and
particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers,
is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation
of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
 
 

http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote/winston_churchill_quote_...

...same as the old boss....

Olbermann attacked Obama for not prosecuting torturers. Interesting moves by MSNBC. The only true lapdog there is Matthews.

This is one of those times. I'm KO'd The power of words. Wow. I can't believe what I just saw. I don't want to believe what I just saw. I don't like what I just saw.

I believe I just watched the funeral for the US Constitution

If we are going to build consensus to restore freedom to our nation, we need to ally ourselves with honest members of the left like Glenn Greenwald and Rachel Maddow. Calling them names and demeaning them because we don't agree with them on everything is shortsighted, nasty, and unproductive.

in my eyes. two examples of truth doesn't make her a good guy.

for over a year & she's one of the fairest reporters & is sharp enough & concerned enough, to get into politicial details.. (or taking a look at the devil)

I believe Tucker Carlson is her personal friend & got her into the MSNBC orbit.

This is the first time in a while I have actually seen a reporter tear a speech apart. Thank God. I'm not a religious person, but this type of real journalism could change my mind.

What is her motive?

Ron Paul's Convention Speech

MSNBC allowed this. They are sooooooooooooo Obama.

Ron Paul for POTUS 2012
*****Obama Is A Communist!*****

Good job, Maddow. Good to see Obama's forked tongue and hypocrisy exposed on national TV.

Someone commented regarding they think some Dems are waking up to the nightmare of the Obama admin. Maybe some, but I check into that rabid Dem rag "The Daily Kos" from time to time to see how Dem people are thinking.

Unless I missed it, it just looks like those folks are sinking deeper and deeper into denial, and just about every thread is a psychosis induced verbal vomit of excuse-making and justification for Obama's obvious hypocrisy, and his breaking almost every campaign promise. Y'know like, "Obama didn't really break his promises and is acting exactly like Bush, because, if you look at it this way... blah blah blah blah...." or something like "it's all just a Liberal/Rep media smear campaign against our messiah", etc.,etc.

Those folks at the Daily Kos are sick-sick-sick.

“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.” -- John Quincy Adams

I agree with you 100% when it comes to Lou Dobbs. The guy is a protectionist and generally not very smart. I especially hate how he always precedes the word "China" with "Communist." Funny, cuz as China is rapidly and increasingly discarding the tired and falacious communist model, our brilliant "economists" in this country are screaming from the highest mountain tops that we need to adopt communism in order to "save capitalism."