This Guy Lyndon Larouche......

Keynesian Abba Lerner of Dec. 2, 1971!

Have you heard about the LaRouche vs. Lerner debate? I suggest you look it up: http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2004/3110abba_lerner.html

For the Ezechiel Emanuel video: http://www.larouchepac.com/files/media/20090613-tony-chaitki...

For those who are interested in real economic discussion:
"The significant feature of the heat-powered machine is the functional relationship between increase of the power supplied to such machines and the increase of the operatives’ power to accomplish work. From the examination of this functional relationship, Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716) defined the notions of power, work, technology within physical science.
The study of this functional relationship, extended from the specific case of the heat-powered machine, to all other features of the productive process, constitutes the subject-matter of Physical Economy. Physical Economy is an integral feature of physical science as a whole; the study of political economy in a manner everywhere governed by principles of physical economy, is economic science."

That's why money has no intrisic value, gold is better, but not the best. questions, or comments...

Communism is a malfunctioning of the State
Fascism a destruction of the State
Obama is not a communist: he is destroying the USA

***********Ron Paul for POTUS 2012***********
*************Obama Is A Communist!************
**********Repeal the 17th Amendment**********
Double the size of the House of Representatives
We have lost the closeness of our Representatives.

LaRouche began his political career as a member of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA), and recruited many of his first followers from the Maoist PLP. As recently as 1976, during a series of lectures called, “What Every Communist Knows,” LaRouche described his movement as part of the “world’s Marxist labor movement” working to “bring into being a new Communist international”. After reading “Mein Kampf” by Adolph Hitler, I saw so many striking similarities in LaRouche ideology I have little doubt that he is the fascist that Dennis King claimed in his book, “Lyndon LaRouche: The New American Fascism.” LaRouche purports to be the only true progenitor of the “American Intellectual Tradition,” and in between thinly veiled anti-Semitic rhetoric, and wild conspiracy theories, claims to be the new Franklin Roosevelt.

Wow not to be trusted....at all he's a shady, shady character....I agree with one of the posts on here....he's like a Scientologist freak...people turnin' up dead, rippin' off old folks and people committing suicide just to get away from his people...nutty...

Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.”
– Patrick Henry, speech to the Virginia Convention

on the internet showing a committee meeting or hearing of some sort where they're discussing health care proposals and nazi type things and one of the Emanuel brothers ends up leaving early when the questioning gets too hot? Does anyone know the video I am referring to? I wish I could find it again. It was fairly recently that I saw it.

They will stalk you like that ex-girlfriend, you know the one.

LaRouche wants... an end to free markets, end to money, and to establish a national bank. He worships FDR. He doesn't understand liberty or economics.

There is an unhealthy obsession with abstractions, historical figures, scientists and philosophers, which are used to enhance credibility by association, especially in the LaRouche Youth. He jumps on-board fads and trends to appeal to certain groups.

Some of his criticisms are right on target. But I would say that many of Marx's criticisms of capitalism are valid as well. However, neither of their solutions are.

I heard all this FDR worshiping drivel. That was enough for me to no longer listen

despite what the Austrian school (British lackeys), Karl Marx (Haileybury school British dupe) and John Maynard Keynes (a Hitler promoter) say... money has no intrinsic value!

Monetarism is a policy of control by financial oligarchs (via Central Banks)

the greatest discovery made by mankind recently was the principle of National Banking (don't misread for Central) with National Public Credit. If your money is not owned by the citizenry then it's privately owned. You choose! Hamilton fought so it would be owned by (We) the People of the United States via our elected officials (Congress) by the US Constitution, Article 1, section 8 quoted beforehand

I know my history and my allegiances are to the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States of America.

By the way LaRouche through his EIR (Executive Intelligence Review) produced very complete historical studies go check them out and give me your comments:
www.larouchepub.com
in the search bar type "American Patriot"

and judge for yourself. He's been making waves since the 70s; Ron Paul made ripples until 2007.

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness (American Founding Principle)
vs.
Life, Liberty, Property (Slave traders' motto)

Hamilton was a major crafter of the Constitution, you can go back and read his papers.
Especially
1) Report on a National Bank
2) Report on Public Credit
3) Report on Manufactures

The Constitution is Hamiltonian. LaRouche is superior because he understood that simple fact.
Lincoln and FDR were also superior for the same reason.

LaRouche doesn't need me to prove he was not guilty the evidences are in legal documents that even you can find.

N.B. Stop quoting wikipedia, it degrades your own soul: slanders originate from feeble minds.

*

LaRouche is basically a low-rent version of L. Ron Hubbard.

-jcr

I like him

If Dr. Ron Paul is today's Thomas Jefferson, then, LaRouche is today's Benjamin Franklin!

The fight is between the British policy of imperial rule versus American principles of national sovereignty. There is a very good reason why America is not a monarchy nor a democratic Congress, only. To be a Constitutional champion I think you have to lean on Hamilton's side as LaRouche does...?! And that's the essence of leadership a Presidential system, with judiciary and legislative checks and balances.

On the money issue:
US Constitution, Article I Section 8.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;

Free trade policies mostly work in the domestic affairs of nations as was recognized by Friedrich List, Henry Clay, Henry C. Carey, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Their records are pretty self-explanatory.

Don't you think???

More books published by LaRouche since the 1970's
http://wlym.com/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Books

.

LaRouche was interesting because he was a vocal liberal against the "liberal" Clinton administration, knocking Clinton better than the Republicans, who stuck with looking at Clinton's personal/sexual "problems".

LaRouche was called a conspiracy theoristist on the weird charges he was making against Clinton (upset Clinton signed us into the UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development in 1992).

For me, LaRouche was who clued me in that the Neoliberals (Clintons, were working with the neocons, Bushs) and the neoliberals were outting the liberals in the Democrat Party, while the Neocons were outting the Republicans in the GOP, and MSM misled the nation in having us think, liberals were outting conservatives and visa-versa. Nader saw what was going on, which in part, why he ran for president, which MSM's job was to remake Nader from a man people went to when they could not get action from a corporation or the government for bad goods, to a man no one wanted to be associated with for saying he saw "no difference between parties". Nader and LaRouche people dominated the antiwar protests.

LaRouche, Nader, Ventura, McKinney, Badnaric, Petrouska, Baldwin, Brown, Keyes, people all have anti-war in common and that's where as a coalation against wars (UN wars) we have an opportunity to unite and educate each other. I'd like to see anti-war move this way, vetting candidates in "open debates" , rather than A.N.S.W.E.R. or some group responsible for the events, thus limiting the events to "anti-Israel" (which should absolutely be a part because it exists, though I personally I for Israel, not that I am for the USA paying Israel or any nation to exist for no nation has the right to exist, not even US).

Their publication Executive Intelligence Review is a good publication of what's really going on and who pulling the strings. Needless to say, Zionists crucify him.

LaRouche points out the problems well. His solutions are not compatible with our message. With that said, I think Ron Paul people should read his stuff, or the stuff of his people, once in a while. I once read an article at EIR (Executive Intelligence Review, a LaRouche site) called "U.S. Mortgage Crisis Can Trigger Collapse Of the Global Casino". It was powerful, and had graphs, chart, etc. I knew about the sub-prime deal WAY before anyone else I knew, because of that article. I called the housing collapse to my friends long before it happened. They called me crazy. Big deal. LaRouche was right.

He wants to take control over the Federal Reserve, nationalize it, and create a 2 tiered credit system of 2% to companies doing infrastructure work to rebuild the country, and 4% to everyone else. He is a huge FDR guy :/

Where he really gets it wrong, is mis-labeling "free-markets" and "free-trade". He HATES the British! He can't stand the British colonialism of the 19th Century, Good! That was the parent of today's globalization. (remember the CFR was spawned from the British RIIA). Those globalists popularized the term "free-trade". What we need to do is teach LaRouche people that what the Globalists advocate is really "WTO Centrally Managed Trade". That is not free-trade. Similarly, we need to teach LaRouche people that you can't have a "free-market economy" if you have a central bank dictating the interest rates and manipulating the money supply causing all of the inflation. That is a centrally managed economy, not a free-market economy.

LaRouche was in the Reagan admin pushing SDI (star wars), and the neo-cons HATED him for it, plus he kept the back channel open with the soviets, helping to avert WW3.

His people are more cult-like towards him than we are towards Ron Paul. He opposes Obama's Nazi health care reform. He HATES Obama!

If you are willing to look with an open mind and learn, there are some good things you can take from his movie "1932, A True History of the United States". Of course, I am not saying I agree with all of it, but I did learn a thing or 2 from this. It is narrated by the guy that played Chikotay from Star Trek Voyager too, lol. Anyways, It is really worth watching.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgcdRCWEt4Q

Here is the article I referenced above.

U.S. Mortgage Crisis Can Trigger Collapse Of the Global Casino
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2007/2007_10-19/2007-1...

Here is his latest webcast. He starts off RIPPING on Obama's health care plan as Nazi Eugenics! HAHAHAHA!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXEZSTQwGh8

I'm not saying we all jump on his bandwagon or anything. I do not agree with some of his positions. I'm just saying he is worth paying attention to. I would say he is a "Protectionist". You can call him a socialist or a commie or whatever, but I think protectionist is most accurate. To him, Obama = Hitler.

EDIT: I am watching the webcast now. He is for putting those companies into bankruptcy, opposes the bailouts, opposes attempts to shut down the farms (food safety modernization act I think is what he is referring to). Ripping on Gov. Arnold. He's cracking jokes on Obama too, LOL! Now he's ripping on the oligarchical systems of Europe, and promoting the reasons for coming here to form a new nation. Promoting the Constitution, and opposing the Bank of England. Now he's saying get rid of the IMF, no more government borrowing from banks, use power of government to create the money and credit.

For more information...

Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.”
– Patrick Henry, speech to the Virginia Convention

They are very much into demagoguery and love FDR style strong leadership. However, they are into conspiracy theories, as is our movement, and are compatible in that way.