I've watched Naomi Wolf in several other videos, and she is a good woman who thinks deeply, more deeply I might add than most of my female friends. I wish I could say something more positive, but we're in an age of Truth vs BS, and most women I know are hard core Liberals/Socialists/Leftists. Politics are not in the normal sphere of interest for most ladies, but they can be PULLED in that direction with "pandering" to a woman's need for "security". Clinton was an absolute PRO at this, and so is Obama. Bush? Who knows what he's good at?! Naomi Wolf seems to have a Socialist core, an ideal community in mind, but does not realize that governments as we know them do not deliver what serves us best,, they serve us as it suits THEM. She has come around to a Libertarian mindset, with Socialist overtones, warm and fuzzy anti-gun society notions, socialized property rights, total health care nirvana, etc. It does not play out this way, and she will hopefully see this down the road. Corruption and government are synonymous, until men and women demand excellence and impose the most serious of consequences for corruption (maybe the guillotine should be back in fashion). Naomi Wolfe also may have a "perfect" Communist scenario in mind, a system which hasn't been successful since the Native Americans ran the show in America. It failed miserably in the USSR for obvious reasons, but maybe she is a little dreamy about the Utopian nature of the concept. Either way, she can perhaps wake up the Liberal ladies and get them to think about what they are asking government to do, which is total management of one's life. They really don't know what that will look like, but they won't be happy campers if they get it. It needs to be headed off at the pass, because it won't easily be reversed by us Ron Paul fringe people if it's allowed to go much further. Russia Today is a little questionable to me, as well. I've been reading quite a few of their archive pieces and watching videos...not sure what their agenda is, but not all above board. They support Ron Paul, which is good, but still a little mystery exists as to what role they are playing.
Submitted by infinityBBC on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 12:46.
we should be careful to not fuel the fire of political division. the war against liberty must be fought with savvy, not with rash emotions in response to someone we might view as being "THE ENEMY"! 8-)
to whatever degree, we're all striving to overthrow deception & indoctrination most of us have endured for most of our lives. Naomi Wolf is no exception -- like everyone, she is not ALL knowledgeable. she perhaps doesn't exactly understand that tyranny comes in the forms of BOTH Fascism AND Socialism.
there are a LOT of good things going on. we revolutionist and/or libertarian-minded Americans (i strive to avoid saying "libertarian" for fear of being misinterpreted to be referring to the LP) need to continue focusing on the continued effort to unite, rather than to divide.
over the past decade or so, i have learned that there is no such thing as a perfect "libertarian", nor a perfect "libertarian philosophy". from what i can tell, NOTHING in this world is perfect BECAUSE WE are not perfect.
so i advise we savvily take the good in whatever anyone says, commend them for it, and then respectfully disagree with them in regards to those things with which we simply do not agree.
"UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL" is a very true statement. if a liberty revolution is going to be successful, we have to heed this fundamental truth -- for the enemies of liberty, knowingly or not, are continuing the "divide and conquer" strategy, which is a very old and effective strategy.
Submitted by infinityBBC on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 12:53.
just i thought i had after posting...
she might have already seen this, but if not, i would suggest her to watch it.
while Alex Jones' new movie is horribly named -- "The Global Bank Deception" might have been a better name which is much more appropriate to its content and avoids playing the political division game -- it does give strong support to the concept that political leaders, such as US Presidents & staff, have been played as puppets for a more sinister agenda of the rich and powerful elite.
so if anyone reading this blog and knows Naomi personally, perhaps they might suggest this to her.
Submitted by SimpleSam on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 13:31.
....Who supports nationalized, socialist health care which means the Federal Government actually gets a premium on the health care and controls it nationwide.
That sort of thing is supposed to be left to states, not the federal ever.
the first thing out of her yapper....
BARACK OBAMA is slowing things down...
DID anyone else hear that???????
Oblamma is the
CHAYYYNGED pilot
but the flight plan
STAYED THE SAME..
She still blames all on bush and says her hero is 'slowing things' down...
He 'inherited'.., he cannot , is not permitted... r i i i i i g h t
- ALL BS
She is hyping the left right paradigm mumbo jumbo
This crap was plotted incrementally decades ago , really.Look at some history about REX 84, clinton was a major player in the set up of all what is going on today
if this was an ugly man saying it, you guys would realize...she is a gate keeper...
—
b.
KILL YOUR TV :
The CIA owns everyone of any significance
in the major media.”
- Former C.I.A. Director William Colby
Submitted by Godwhacker on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 10:34.
People like Rachel Maddow, Glenn Greenwald, & Dennis Kucinich are good and honest people. Even though we might disagree with them on any number of issues, we need to form an alliance with them to end the military empire and restore the rule of law. There simply aren't enough of us to do it alone. After we restore the constitution, then we can have an honest discussion about domestic policy.
Submitted by Godwhacker on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 10:46.
about killing innocent people and breeding mountains of hate with the hubris of foreign occupation than I am with health care right now. I support a free and deregulated health care system, but that is simply not a priority given that:
A) We've already had socialized medicine in this country for the last 44 years.
Nationalized healthcare will kill many people on the margin, just like warmongering around the world will kill people. Both are examples of big gov't evil.
Submitted by BmoreBrawler on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 13:14.
Reminds me of when Scott Horton said on his Antiwar Radio program, "People need to understand that public education is not the worst f******* government program!"
Submitted by SimpleSam on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 10:53.
That supposedly is supposed to be free, is going to be national and charge you $1000 if you don't get it. Do you realize this is essentially, government sponsored health care and not voluntary.
Do you support this kind of health care? That was my question.
Submitted by Canna-chan on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 13:28.
That was really nasty, you know. In a childish way. SimpleSam has a point.
BuckOFive, it looks to me like YOU'RE the one who didn't read the post. Yes, things are going dreadfully wrong. But can't you see it? Our liberty is being taken bit by bit, so slowly that you can't complain. The new Healthcare plan is just part of that.
Keep in mind she must stay in the Liberal Sphere to be listened too and have relevance to them. Her influence is with Liberals. To pick on Bush is fine. To not mention Ron Paul is fine. To not be perceived as a member of our R3VOLution is fine, simply because she must keep her Liberal look and feel to that Super Group. She has to be respectful of Obama, yet specific in her criticism.
Absolutely right. Hopefully she will stay on this and persuade the Obamanoids that they can look at the executive branch critically and get back to the anti-war effort and still save face.
She brings up crimes past ...as if nothing was continuing under her zerohero ... she talks a lot of 'bad ' cheney,bush & rice...they did this and that and this. poor obaba INHERITED it all
Obama is not permitted to stop this, just SLOW things down? BULL
She said absolutely NOTHING CRITICAL of obama, just stated a mere fact on indefinte detention...she NEVER said any in judgement about it against OBAAAAAAHMA
—
b.
KILL YOUR TV :
The CIA owns everyone of any significance
in the major media.”
- Former C.I.A. Director William Colby
She actually did say quite a bit about Guantanamo and how it is actually growing and is very secretive under Obama, in spite of his stated plans for it.
Submitted by SimpleSam on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 13:45.
...The CIA was in charge of all that, not Obama. Obama himself is a former CIA agent so who is she kidding, saying that this guy was "changing" all of it. He tried, and maybe he even put a show trial on in the Senate.
That's not "change" Naomi......You were duped by yet another fraud again.
Submitted by Lee Trembley on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 00:06.
this was a good interview overall... but, i have a few bones to pick with Naomi. first of all, the President doesn't have "the right" to do these things - he has the unconstitutional power.
also, she really is thickheaded to not have realized Ron Paul is who she seeks... she just has a lot of things mixed up still
Good to see her finally out criticizing the Emperor's clothes. I thought it was bunk that she ever supported him, but I suppose she had to give him a chance to see what he would actually do in office. Now she knows and its nice to see that she is calling him on it. Now if she could only get a grasp of property rights and the 2nd amendment vs. gov't control she could be a force for good.
Submitted by Tom Mullen on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 18:36.
SHe says that the foundation for fascism was laid by the Bush adminstration. Wrong. It was laid at least as far back as FDR, who based his policy on a combination of Mussolini and Stalin. It was continued, for the most part, by Democrats throughout the 20th century, and only by Republicans once they went neo-con (which to a large part was because they were former Democrats). Naomi doesn't recognize that the core problem is a people without property rights and the right to bear arms - two things she stands against. Without money and without a means of self defense, people are already slaves, regardless of what rules of evidence there are if they happen to find themselves accused of something. She goes pretty soft on Obama, also, because he is a Democrat.
Submitted by BuckOFive on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 10:45.
She doesn't have the same adherence or understanding of principle that you do but she does quite clearly have a clue. She is saying what needs to be said in a way that it needs to be said in order to reach others that don't even question Obama. She is starting the process and what she has done is very valuable.
have no absolute moral compass, since they don't absolutely oppose ALL coercion against peaceful people. They pick and choose what coercion is ok according to popular trends: it's ok to tax the "rich" (anyone who earns a paycheck) to give stuff to the "poor" (anyone who doesn't earn a paycheck); or to "save the environment" (whatever popular hair-brained scheme they subscribe to), educate everyone (propagandize and dumb down individuals to be "good" citizens), provide health care (state-approved monopolistic, pharmaceuticals for all),etc.
Then after building up the coercive state to provide all their fuzzy-brained programs, they are perpetually frustrated by how poorly the arrogant bureaucrats & pols they put into place perform, and always are belatedly surprised at the police state powers that (surprise!) now affect even their own ranks of well-intentioned nitwits.
Submitted by Lee Trembley on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 20:24.
they have no concept of principles... and as you say, they are surprised to see the lack of success of these programs. they have been brainwashed into thinking government is the Knight in Shining Armor... (at least liberals i know). and they literally have NO understanding of economics...
Not many people have the guts to go on International television and admit they were wrong. I know she didn't say that in those words.... but this is a gal who is admitting that Obama is NOT solving these problems and is, in fact, CONTINUING the horrendous policies. ALL of her friends were and probably still are for Obama. She has got courage even if she isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier.
You don't have to be willing to follow everyone off a cliff just because they see the light in certain areas..... but you can admire and give credit for some courage when it appears. Peace
__________________________________________________
"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6pAcBXt2j8
—
****
A Man's Country Is Not A Certain Area Of Land, Of Mountains, Rivers, And Woods, But It Is A Principle...
And Patriotism Is Loyalty To That Principle - George William Curtis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCYr8TWAGn0&feature=related
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."
-- Patrick Henry
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."
-- Patrick Henry
just before it was posted and then noticed someone was faster. It is quite an impressive interview, she goes into quite detail. One cna see she is disillusioned and frustrated. Remember she come from a liberal backround and campaigned for Al Gore in 2000 etc. but she is also differentiated and reached out to Christian conservatives on abortion and low moral standards (postitution, degrading of woman) etc. and spoke at one of our rallies last year.
I think she should meet with Dr. Paul in person, perhaps also with Mary Ruwart together. She had a good interview with Lew Rockwell also and is very much a libertarian and knows the constitution. That principles are importan tto her, unlike many liberals (or conservatives, I should add). For 2012, she could mobilize a lot of women and Independent voters, but one can also work on joint projects on how best to attain goals.
who are getting tired of your simplistic arguments and denouncements of everyone that disagree only a little bit from you. I believe in openness and storng principles, but they way you deal with opponents or people you agree with on certain issues and disagree on others issues is also important. Always set and example and stop name calling. We are above that.
I agree Naomi really showed also open courage. She knew Obama was not going to be a total constitutionalist, but thought he would go into that direction, and be an improvement on Bush a bit... Everybody can be disappointed. Look how Bush also promised a humble foreign policy etc.
This certainly explains why she supported O'Bama instead of Ron Paul.
RT: You said that all our freedoms are down the toilet unless we act now.
Wolf: Yes, and that is why I endorsed the Obama regime. I stand by my decision and will not apologize. I am glad that I saw this all along and chose the lesser of two evils, so that we can all enjoy the current evil.
Submitted by MikeLawson on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 10:11.
I can't. Supported the lesser of two evils so we could still get evil, just not quite as bad. What cracks me up is that ANYONE is stupid enough to think there would be any difference at all between the two main puppets.
______________________________________
“Let them protest all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.” ...credited to Al Haig, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/liberty_outlook/
Russia Today / Naomi Wolf
I've watched Naomi Wolf in several other videos, and she is a good woman who thinks deeply, more deeply I might add than most of my female friends. I wish I could say something more positive, but we're in an age of Truth vs BS, and most women I know are hard core Liberals/Socialists/Leftists. Politics are not in the normal sphere of interest for most ladies, but they can be PULLED in that direction with "pandering" to a woman's need for "security". Clinton was an absolute PRO at this, and so is Obama. Bush? Who knows what he's good at?! Naomi Wolf seems to have a Socialist core, an ideal community in mind, but does not realize that governments as we know them do not deliver what serves us best,, they serve us as it suits THEM. She has come around to a Libertarian mindset, with Socialist overtones, warm and fuzzy anti-gun society notions, socialized property rights, total health care nirvana, etc. It does not play out this way, and she will hopefully see this down the road. Corruption and government are synonymous, until men and women demand excellence and impose the most serious of consequences for corruption (maybe the guillotine should be back in fashion). Naomi Wolfe also may have a "perfect" Communist scenario in mind, a system which hasn't been successful since the Native Americans ran the show in America. It failed miserably in the USSR for obvious reasons, but maybe she is a little dreamy about the Utopian nature of the concept. Either way, she can perhaps wake up the Liberal ladies and get them to think about what they are asking government to do, which is total management of one's life. They really don't know what that will look like, but they won't be happy campers if they get it. It needs to be headed off at the pass, because it won't easily be reversed by us Ron Paul fringe people if it's allowed to go much further. Russia Today is a little questionable to me, as well. I've been reading quite a few of their archive pieces and watching videos...not sure what their agenda is, but not all above board. They support Ron Paul, which is good, but still a little mystery exists as to what role they are playing.
everyone step back, LIBERTY is trying to breath! 8-)
we should be careful to not fuel the fire of political division. the war against liberty must be fought with savvy, not with rash emotions in response to someone we might view as being "THE ENEMY"! 8-)
to whatever degree, we're all striving to overthrow deception & indoctrination most of us have endured for most of our lives. Naomi Wolf is no exception -- like everyone, she is not ALL knowledgeable. she perhaps doesn't exactly understand that tyranny comes in the forms of BOTH Fascism AND Socialism.
there are a LOT of good things going on. we revolutionist and/or libertarian-minded Americans (i strive to avoid saying "libertarian" for fear of being misinterpreted to be referring to the LP) need to continue focusing on the continued effort to unite, rather than to divide.
over the past decade or so, i have learned that there is no such thing as a perfect "libertarian", nor a perfect "libertarian philosophy". from what i can tell, NOTHING in this world is perfect BECAUSE WE are not perfect.
so i advise we savvily take the good in whatever anyone says, commend them for it, and then respectfully disagree with them in regards to those things with which we simply do not agree.
"UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL" is a very true statement. if a liberty revolution is going to be successful, we have to heed this fundamental truth -- for the enemies of liberty, knowingly or not, are continuing the "divide and conquer" strategy, which is a very old and effective strategy.
GiveMeLiberty.org
OathKeepers.org
PS: Naomi, check out "The Obama Deception" by Alex Jones
just i thought i had after posting...
she might have already seen this, but if not, i would suggest her to watch it.
while Alex Jones' new movie is horribly named -- "The Global Bank Deception" might have been a better name which is much more appropriate to its content and avoids playing the political division game -- it does give strong support to the concept that political leaders, such as US Presidents & staff, have been played as puppets for a more sinister agenda of the rich and powerful elite.
so if anyone reading this blog and knows Naomi personally, perhaps they might suggest this to her.
She's a shill.....
....Who supports nationalized, socialist health care which means the Federal Government actually gets a premium on the health care and controls it nationwide.
That sort of thing is supposed to be left to states, not the federal ever.
BS NAOMI
the first thing out of her yapper....
BARACK OBAMA is slowing things down...
DID anyone else hear that???????
Oblamma is the
CHAYYYNGED pilot
but the flight plan
STAYED THE SAME..
She still blames all on bush and says her hero is 'slowing things' down...
He 'inherited'.., he cannot , is not permitted... r i i i i i g h t
- ALL BS
She is hyping the left right paradigm mumbo jumbo
This crap was plotted incrementally decades ago , really.Look at some history about REX 84, clinton was a major player in the set up of all what is going on today
if this was an ugly man saying it, you guys would realize...she is a gate keeper...
b.
KILL YOUR TV :
The CIA owns everyone of any significance
in the major media.”
- Former C.I.A. Director William Colby
Naomi
I'm glad you're waking up now, but we could have told you that any member of the CFR would only be another tool of the power elite.
Sad video
But needs to be seen.
Liberal Jumps off the Obama Train...
That is just a FLAT OUT excellent interview. For a Liberal, that is a bulls eye right between the eyes.
Please do what I did, copy and past that video link and mass mail it out to every one on your email list.
Here is how I entitled mine....
Big time Liberal writer Naomi Wolf questions President Obama...
....then jumps ship!!!!
“Obama has the right to lock any US citizen up forever without trial”
Watch & listen to shocking Video interview here:
No she only pretends
If you listen carefully you will HEAR whom she is BASHING....
and it aint wonderboy , trust me...
Naomi:
Keeper of the false L / R Paradigm
Singer of ideological Hegemony
b.
KILL YOUR TV :
The CIA owns everyone of any significance
in the major media.”
- Former C.I.A. Director William Colby
There are plenty of honest liberals
People like Rachel Maddow, Glenn Greenwald, & Dennis Kucinich are good and honest people. Even though we might disagree with them on any number of issues, we need to form an alliance with them to end the military empire and restore the rule of law. There simply aren't enough of us to do it alone. After we restore the constitution, then we can have an honest discussion about domestic policy.
Yeah but....
...She supports Obama's insane health care scheme.....which no American should ever sign onto.
I more worried
about killing innocent people and breeding mountains of hate with the hubris of foreign occupation than I am with health care right now. I support a free and deregulated health care system, but that is simply not a priority given that:
A) We've already had socialized medicine in this country for the last 44 years.
and
B) People are dying.
Its all the same thing
Nationalized healthcare will kill many people on the margin, just like warmongering around the world will kill people. Both are examples of big gov't evil.
Reminds me of when Scott
Reminds me of when Scott Horton said on his Antiwar Radio program, "People need to understand that public education is not the worst f******* government program!"
Ventura 2012
Simple sam- what you should
Simple sam- what you should have said was, "Yeah but I didn't listen to a word you just said and I'm going to comment anyway."
So do you support nationalized healthcare.....
....Do you support this?
Does the logic that
Does the logic that functions in your brain make you reach that conclusion?
Healthcare....
That supposedly is supposed to be free, is going to be national and charge you $1000 if you don't get it. Do you realize this is essentially, government sponsored health care and not voluntary.
Do you support this kind of health care? That was my question.
Don't sweat it
His name is appropriate.
Amen
Amen
Excuse me?
That was really nasty, you know. In a childish way. SimpleSam has a point.
BuckOFive, it looks to me like YOU'RE the one who didn't read the post. Yes, things are going dreadfully wrong. But can't you see it? Our liberty is being taken bit by bit, so slowly that you can't complain. The new Healthcare plan is just part of that.
"Be Patriotic. Buy guns."
For those critical of Naomi...
Keep in mind she must stay in the Liberal Sphere to be listened too and have relevance to them. Her influence is with Liberals. To pick on Bush is fine. To not mention Ron Paul is fine. To not be perceived as a member of our R3VOLution is fine, simply because she must keep her Liberal look and feel to that Super Group. She has to be respectful of Obama, yet specific in her criticism.
I say, Go Naomi, Go!
In peace & liberty,
Treg
Agreed.
Absolutely right. Hopefully she will stay on this and persuade the Obamanoids that they can look at the executive branch critically and get back to the anti-war effort and still save face.
ditto
I agree, she is helping shatter the obananoids view of Obama.
12.160Mhz Social Network
Resisting the New World Order
http://tinyurl.com/12160mhz
Bio Watch :
http://snardfarker.ning.com/group/flu
Chat room
http://12160.chatango.com/
12.160Mhz Social Network
Resisting the New World Order
http://12160.org
Bio Watch : Vaccine / Flu Info and News
http://tinyurl.com/12160BioWatch
Chat room
http://12160org.chatango.com/
exactly where does she do this in that interview?
She brings up crimes past ...as if nothing was continuing under her zerohero ... she talks a lot of 'bad ' cheney,bush & rice...they did this and that and this. poor obaba INHERITED it all
Obama is not permitted to stop this, just SLOW things down? BULL
She said absolutely NOTHING CRITICAL of obama, just stated a mere fact on indefinte detention...she NEVER said any in judgement about it against OBAAAAAAHMA
b.
KILL YOUR TV :
The CIA owns everyone of any significance
in the major media.”
- Former C.I.A. Director William Colby
She actually did say quite a
She actually did say quite a bit about Guantanamo and how it is actually growing and is very secretive under Obama, in spite of his stated plans for it.
Naomi also said surprise surprise....
...The CIA was in charge of all that, not Obama. Obama himself is a former CIA agent so who is she kidding, saying that this guy was "changing" all of it. He tried, and maybe he even put a show trial on in the Senate.
That's not "change" Naomi......You were duped by yet another fraud again.
hmmm...
this was a good interview overall... but, i have a few bones to pick with Naomi. first of all, the President doesn't have "the right" to do these things - he has the unconstitutional power.
also, she really is thickheaded to not have realized Ron Paul is who she seeks... she just has a lot of things mixed up still
formerly known as trembo slice
Good to see her finally out
Good to see her finally out criticizing the Emperor's clothes. I thought it was bunk that she ever supported him, but I suppose she had to give him a chance to see what he would actually do in office. Now she knows and its nice to see that she is calling him on it. Now if she could only get a grasp of property rights and the 2nd amendment vs. gov't control she could be a force for good.
Naomi doesn't have a clue
SHe says that the foundation for fascism was laid by the Bush adminstration. Wrong. It was laid at least as far back as FDR, who based his policy on a combination of Mussolini and Stalin. It was continued, for the most part, by Democrats throughout the 20th century, and only by Republicans once they went neo-con (which to a large part was because they were former Democrats). Naomi doesn't recognize that the core problem is a people without property rights and the right to bear arms - two things she stands against. Without money and without a means of self defense, people are already slaves, regardless of what rules of evidence there are if they happen to find themselves accused of something. She goes pretty soft on Obama, also, because he is a Democrat.
Tom Mullen
author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America
Tom Mullen
author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America
She doesn't have the same
She doesn't have the same adherence or understanding of principle that you do but she does quite clearly have a clue. She is saying what needs to be said in a way that it needs to be said in order to reach others that don't even question Obama. She is starting the process and what she has done is very valuable.
This is good
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must. like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.-Thomas Paine
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must. like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.-Thomas Paine
The R3volution requires action, not observation!!!!
Front page
material.
The core problem with Leftists is that they
have no absolute moral compass, since they don't absolutely oppose ALL coercion against peaceful people. They pick and choose what coercion is ok according to popular trends: it's ok to tax the "rich" (anyone who earns a paycheck) to give stuff to the "poor" (anyone who doesn't earn a paycheck); or to "save the environment" (whatever popular hair-brained scheme they subscribe to), educate everyone (propagandize and dumb down individuals to be "good" citizens), provide health care (state-approved monopolistic, pharmaceuticals for all),etc.
Then after building up the coercive state to provide all their fuzzy-brained programs, they are perpetually frustrated by how poorly the arrogant bureaucrats & pols they put into place perform, and always are belatedly surprised at the police state powers that (surprise!) now affect even their own ranks of well-intentioned nitwits.
nailed it
they have no concept of principles... and as you say, they are surprised to see the lack of success of these programs. they have been brainwashed into thinking government is the Knight in Shining Armor... (at least liberals i know). and they literally have NO understanding of economics...
formerly known as trembo slice
Welcome back, Naomi
-------------------------------------------------------
"I think it would be a good idea"
Mahatma Gandhi,
when asked what he thought of Western civilization
God is at home, it's we who have gone out for a walk."
Meister Eckhart
You gotta give her credit....
Not many people have the guts to go on International television and admit they were wrong. I know she didn't say that in those words.... but this is a gal who is admitting that Obama is NOT solving these problems and is, in fact, CONTINUING the horrendous policies. ALL of her friends were and probably still are for Obama. She has got courage even if she isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier.
You don't have to be willing to follow everyone off a cliff just because they see the light in certain areas..... but you can admire and give credit for some courage when it appears. Peace
__________________________________________________
"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6pAcBXt2j8
****
A Man's Country Is Not A Certain Area Of Land, Of Mountains, Rivers, And Woods, But It Is A Principle...
And Patriotism Is Loyalty To That Principle - George William Curtis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCYr8TWAGn0&feature=related
well said patriot
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."
-- Patrick Henry
___________________
Jake Towne "Fire Cake" Money Bomb February 15
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/122445
Donate = Freedom*))
bump
good interview.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."
-- Patrick Henry
___________________
Jake Towne "Fire Cake" Money Bomb February 15
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/122445
Donate = Freedom*))
yes indeed
just before it was posted and then noticed someone was faster. It is quite an impressive interview, she goes into quite detail. One cna see she is disillusioned and frustrated. Remember she come from a liberal backround and campaigned for Al Gore in 2000 etc. but she is also differentiated and reached out to Christian conservatives on abortion and low moral standards (postitution, degrading of woman) etc. and spoke at one of our rallies last year.
I think she should meet with Dr. Paul in person, perhaps also with Mary Ruwart together. She had a good interview with Lew Rockwell also and is very much a libertarian and knows the constitution. That principles are importan tto her, unlike many liberals (or conservatives, I should add). For 2012, she could mobilize a lot of women and Independent voters, but one can also work on joint projects on how best to attain goals.
Wow, very powerful
interview, thanks for posting.
Wolf in sheep's clothing....
And that's all she is. Gitmo and the like is just the beginning of what the Zionists & Globalists have done to prisons.....
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
there are some of us
who are getting tired of your simplistic arguments and denouncements of everyone that disagree only a little bit from you. I believe in openness and storng principles, but they way you deal with opponents or people you agree with on certain issues and disagree on others issues is also important. Always set and example and stop name calling. We are above that.
I agree Naomi really showed also open courage. She knew Obama was not going to be a total constitutionalist, but thought he would go into that direction, and be an improvement on Bush a bit... Everybody can be disappointed. Look how Bush also promised a humble foreign policy etc.
Well...
This certainly explains why she supported O'Bama instead of Ron Paul.
RT: You said that all our freedoms are down the toilet unless we act now.
Wolf: Yes, and that is why I endorsed the Obama regime. I stand by my decision and will not apologize. I am glad that I saw this all along and chose the lesser of two evils, so that we can all enjoy the current evil.
Wolf. The name fits.
Can you even imagine being that retarded?
I can't. Supported the lesser of two evils so we could still get evil, just not quite as bad. What cracks me up is that ANYONE is stupid enough to think there would be any difference at all between the two main puppets.
can someone fix the link?
_________________________________________
sdrawkcab gnihtyreve od deF eht & tnemrevog ehT
Hmmm... it seems to work OK for me...
...but maybe you'll have better luck at the source: http://tinyurl.com/nerxkt
______________________________________
“Let them protest all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.” ...credited to Al Haig, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/liberty_outlook/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Let them protest all they want, as long as they pay their taxes.” ...credited to Al Haig, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/liberty_outlook/
http://www.dailypaul.com/blog/11
Ron Paul = Red Pill