• stupid fcking copyright

    stupid fcking copyright BULLSHIT

  • Steadfast My Wayward Sons

  • next thing, she'll be

    next thing, she'll be bringing in a helicopter, while paying unsuspecting folls whose english is not their main language, telling them to wear white dusty robes, while pretending to be escorting two journalistic employees, one of them holding a camera size bazooka, and you dont want to knlw what happens when virus pushes the red button on her wired up, pprtable button thingy mi jingy, "twerking" all the while, with the "big show" as her backdrop....

    Collateral damage, its so trivial, as is a president with no restraint, apparently

  • the sad thing is, most

    the sad thing is, most people wont see the courage on display, or the rare initiative in putting this video together, then, on top of that, in a clear and smart way

    We might not all be lucky to have this courage for now, but when one pushes through the barriere we've been conditioned not to push through, i WILL stand up, and take notice.......it is the minum amount of appreciation i can do, to see this person do something we all should be doing, and not be seen as a bad thing.

    I love the fact the officer was telling the un-arrested not to tell him what to do or what to say......very fucking ironic that he thinks its then ok for HIM to do it, just because he falsely believes his costume gives him that right to do so, at all times

    its starting to narrow down i think, the more we see, the more we learn the nature, the more we understand, the more we are prepared, the less the nervousness affects us, that barrier they so much rely upon diminishes, INSPITE of their continous efforts to reinforce that barrier divide

    You are just people like us, you have no special privilages, if you think thats bull, then it also means you think your better then people........there is nothing better or worse then people, it is the natural state of free men and women, you deny this, then it may be likely you want more, which means not surpringly, at the expense of others, you want to boss people about, that means an individual, gets bossed about, you kill somebody, it means an individual has lost his right to live........you are not getting resistance just because, you are getting ressistance for doing things you shouldnt be doing......and if you guys were'nt lieing through your teeths about "listening" to the people then something like this may not happen

  • one of the biggest diffrences

    one of the biggest diffrences between ron and MANY officials, is, that ron has been saying what he's been saying for YEARS, and i just so happen to agree with alot of what he's been saying, if you want someone to have the level of trust and support that i show ron paul, simple, say/do something i like for many many years without compromising your ideals.

    Thats not to say i wont trust others, its just that,.....THAT level of trust Ron Paul EARNED, i wont just give that same level of trust, to just anybody, .....it diminishes what ron did, stuck to hes convictions for YEARS......like i said, that doesnt mean ill withhold my support for others, in diffrent ways, maybe a couple of years from now rand will earn that level of trust/support, but please dont say it as if what ron did was easy or simple, so many fail to do what ron did, at lest in our lifetime, it feels

  • goodluck to everyone tomorrow

    goodluck to everyone tomorrow for all our sakes

    thankyou micheal for spreading the word

  • yeah, i always like to keep

    yeah, i always like to keep my reading glasses fresh

  • bring a damn camera with you,

    bring a damn camera with you, ready, hell put a hidden one, with streaming and online storage, and do not fucking inform them of it, its not like they've been showing US that curtesy, everyone else, you see greenwald, get your finger on the trigger, to YOUR camera

    I said it once and ill say it again, big cahones on this one......right on brother

  • dont worry, were thinking

    dont worry, were thinking about it.......

    like me, no social accounts, but that dont mean i think im "unreachable", their whole point is to get their hooks in everything, otherwise they cant justify the "program" to the ones who blindly give their support, when "terrorists" slip through anything they dont have monitored, which im sure their all heart broken about, having the ability to monitor and the potential to manipulate, anything THEY deem unliked, oh yeah, cry me a crocodile tear river, here, have some tissue, ....... thems scum

  • You cared enough to care, and

    You cared enough to care, and i care about those sorts of things, thankyou for releasing information people SHOULD, know is being done unto them, and, in their own damn names.........i dont scorn you brother, i embrace you

    internet embrace :)

  • "Authorized" illegality

    "Authorized" illegality

  • or on top of your

    or on top of your head.


  • i have no idea to the facts

    i have no idea to the facts of the situation but i feel it in my bones that somethings not right with the situation and how it was reported

    taking a step back and trying to look at the whole picture, i suspect that their is many factions involved, being one of the reasons why they are so reluctant to go into detail, one faction can only account for themselves, faction reaveling something another faction cant support, deny, explain, is not a situation they want, assuming ive gof this right

    Another thing, russo says this was planned, that the "event" purpose was to create FICTIONAL global terrorism, an illusion to mask, explain actions that would be, could be seen in a negative way, suddenly invading another country, installing pipelines, and creating a base in the middle east, knowing that may cost many lives, its not beyond the scope of reason that, this "event" could have been a reason to pre-explain actions they new they were gonna make but would be seen negatively, if they didnt have the "war on terrorism" to mask the real intent, something that would have been obvious otherwise.

    As for the bbc reporting a building that fell, having that building in the backshoot of that report, fully intact, assuming that this "events" sole purpose was to build up the peoples compliance, i would not be surprised to learn that originally, they were gonna tell the people it was infact controlled demolitions, but used it as dramatic affect otherwise, what if originally, the demolitions were there as a safety measure, if this was indeed planned, and they were worried it might get out of hand, fires spreading, affecting more buildings then intended, or thoughts along those lines......or possible not, may they intalled explosives after, but that would still mean some of this was planned ahead of schedule, unless everysingle government employee has the knowledge to install explosives in the right places to create a perfect controlled demolition, if it was after they either have the local experts on speedcall, or they were ready

    Theories, all theories........because something stinks

  • "do as i say under threat of

    "do as i say under threat of death"

    dont want say anything, threat of death
    WANT to say something, threat of death
    dont want to identify yourself, just because your being randomly asked, threat of death
    dont want to show blind support to authority, irregardless of any action they might make that would go against natural rights, the law of the land, threat of death

    they dont need this bill to create this threat, its already there, at the end of many other used threats before it, the threats take place when folks dont do what a bunch of other folks tell them to do, and not supporting them for doing it, even when they are wrong, which we must never be spoken off.........whats the actions of that mentality gonna be like in 10, 20 years time from now, if people are made ignorant of it

  • let ron paul finish his

    let ron paul finish his thoughts dammit

  • remote control off switch for

    remote control off switch for cars

    on the motorway driving 70, way to create yet another danger that wasnt there before, folks should take these things out on principle, if not, safety......this is why their judgement gets questioned so often........are we suppose to pretend that this might not be used "incorrectly", or that they have secured something so completely, nsa would have a hard time in surveying, or just plain old honest to god, good old fashioned, bad implementation, an imoral hackers wet dream

  • "Police to turn cars off

    "Police to turn cars off remotely in EU by 2020"

    How about....

    "The People to turn governments off remotely in EU by 2014"

    ohhhhh, a paradox

  • this is how they should be

    this is how they should be ALL the time, and that doesnt happen when things around you have an "official" noctation to it, i guess this is partly why i cringed with rands response, i detest traditional politics, because it stops them from being informal which is what ill listen to, look at that, think i made a conciense breakthrough, i associate "formality" to fakeness, i wont apoligise for that, can you really blame me, look at past examples

    Informality, because at least i can trust you a little

    However that is taken, i still appreciate the link, thanks

  • "The video is immediately

    "The video is immediately taken down every time it’s posted on Youtube."

    One of those rare opportunities, if true to record the "truth of the matter", the takedown of freespeech, political, opinions that dont agree with their own, pro nsa folks cannot claim that the secret interpretations of terrorist laws is not being applied here, they sure as hell seem to be using the "authority" that has been "given" them, the tools, SPECIFICALLY stated by THEM, ONLY to be used against "terrorist".....where the secret interpretation of terrorists seems to be defined as EVERYONE

    Trying to sneak full blown control, and i still cant decide if its ignorance or malice, although i suspect strongly its both

    ok, that seemed to be a tad offtopic-ish

  • sooooooooo, much fakeness in

    sooooooooo, much fakeness in that room, they clap, but thats all they do, well except sometimes the actions that contradict the sentiment to that FAKE clapping

    probably one of my all time 3 cringe worthy moments, make sure to get michele guys, dont forget bamy, and biden, oh look, its a boner, very important to get certain folks associated with this "true" sentiment, backed up by their action, all actions were right, and not one had sever conflicts with persons rights, honest to god pinky swear, look, im clapping.....my--self, uh, uhmm, ignore that egotistical bit,

    the wrongness of that room was even more profound in the second viewing, its difficult to pinpoint the exact reason in writing, all i know is, it is a very obvious reaction i have......best way i can describe it is, like a bunch of evil people in a room pretending to be good guys, and getting away with it