• You can't see the hypocrisy

    You can't see the hypocrisy in actively supporting another government? That's the last government I would expect a 'liberty'candidate to support. U know with its constant wars, terrorism and illegal land grabs.

  • He supports israel. That to

    He supports israel. That to me is enough to not support him. How can he support a foreign government while at the same time allegedly working to reduce the size and scope of his own? That screams hypocrite to me.

  • I really envy expats. I will

    I really envy expats. I will join you as soon as its financially possible.

  • I don't want the state to

    I don't want the state to 'achieve' anything. I want it out of my life. If there is anything Rand and co should be 'achieving' it should be repealing federal laws if not outright abolishing it.

  • Ron Paul is a principled man.

    Ron Paul is a principled man. Some hate him, some love him. His uncompromising has won over millions to the cause of liberty. Rand, in his quest to please everyone risks coming across as a flip flopper. He will still be hated by some like his father, but he will be loved by none. He is basically just another power jostling politician.

  • I want national recognition

    I want national recognition damn it!!!!

  • While I'm glad that the cop

    While I'm glad that the cop didn't shoot the dog, the fact that we are now so used to police executing pets that we are happy when they don't is a pretty sad commentary on the state of amerika. When i was delivering pizzas, I dealt with aggressive dogs all the time without harming or killing them. Where are my kudos?

  • He's put his foot in his

    He's put his foot in his mouth so many times, i'm amazed anyone can believe or trust him.

  • He wants to remove habeus

    He wants to remove habeus corpus for 'terrorists', which means more of Guantanamo and torture. That doesn't sound like liberty to me. Why are folks going out of their way to ignore this??

  • Good for him. Everyone here

    Good for him. Everyone here knows the truth but they are too scared to say it. This guy has more courage on his pinky nail than all of congress put together.

  • I will grant you that he's

    I will grant you that he's much better than a Mccain for instance, but he's still not a liberty candidate, and he will go to congress to be another Rand Paul or Ted Cruz. As i said before he would suspend habeus corpus for 'terrorists' boogeymen. Where in the constitution does it allow the government to suspend habeus corpus for 'terrorists'? If he's that flimsy on basic bill of right provisions, what else could he do that he's not telling us? He's ok with foreign intervention if its in US interests. This leaves a broad loophole for foreign intervention. Why not just say NO to all non defensive wars and this will cure our terrorist, NSA, patriot act problems. His support for military trials and foreign interventions and his opposition to loss of civil liberties at home is a contradiction since one is responsible for the other.

  • Trade wars are the harbinger

    Trade wars are the harbinger of military wars. We have just declared a trade war with Russia.

  • Ahh so Ron was returning a

    Ahh so Ron was returning a favor. Got it.

    He supports suspending habeus corpus for 'terrorists'. So he's OK with Guantanamo, torture etc.

  • I don't know much about Taft

    I don't know much about Taft and Goldwater, but i know Perot was a protectionist and drug warrior.

  • Just because Ron Paul

    Just because Ron Paul endorsed someone doesn't make them a liberty candidate. Why don't you think for yourself and stop letting others pick your candidates for you.

  • I read his issues and he is

    I read his issues and he is fail on foreign policy, like Rubio, Rand, Cruz and the other warmongering teacon repukes. Clint Didier supports suspending habeus corpus in the pursuit of those boogeymen 'terrorists'. He also says:

    "A foreign intervention is justified when it legitimately protects our national security, following a declaration of war by the congress."

    Who determines when that intervention 'protects our national security'? President Obama could make the case that intervening in Syria and Libya protects our national security. Any non defensive war i.e foreign intervention is a recipe for disaster. These interventions lead to loss of other liberties here cue homeland security, NSA and patriot act etc which Didier supposedly opposes. Didier is also endorsed by neocon israeli mark levin, just like Ted Cruz. Why is Ron Paul endorsing a man who's foreign policy is the polar opposite of his? Why doesn't he just support all republicans or tea party candidates if his vetting is this shoddy? Don't follow a candidate just because Ron Paul is endorsing him. Does he know where his endorsees stand on foreign policy or doesn't he care? If you want to support Didier, go for it, but i take strong exception to the term 'liberty candidate'. Read up the issues of every candidate and stop just following them because Ron Paul has endorsed them. I thought we had critical thinkers here for God's sake.

  • Rand will not be president.

    Rand will not be president. All his disrobing before the zionist interests will be for nought.

  • Good for Jessie!! You can't

    Good for Jessie!! You can't profit from telling lies about others. chris kyle was a terrorist occupier who then profited off tales of killing people in far away lands. People who's only crime was defending themselves from illegal war and occupation. He lived by the gun so it was only fitting that he die by it.

  • Peru, El Salvador, Chile and

    Peru, El Salvador, Chile and Ecuador have also recalled their ambassadors. Good to know there are countries that have not been deceived by the zionists.

  • Glad to finally a

    Glad to finally be a participant...i've been lurking for years. Thanks Nystrom and DP community.